The sociology of scientific work: The fundamental relationship between science and society

The Sociology of Scientific Work: The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Vinck, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881749135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (251)

1. Ashmore, M., Mulkay, M. and Pinch, T. (1989), Health and Efficiency: A Sociology of Health Economics, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
2. Deutsch, K., Markovits, A. and Platt, J. (1986), Advances in the Social Sciences 1900-1980, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
3. Fuller, S., De Mey, M., Shinn, T. and Woolgar, S. (eds) (1989), 'The cognitive turn. Sociological and psychological perspectives on science', in Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. 13, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Halliday, T. and Janowitz, M. (1992), Sociology and its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Latour, B. (1996), Aramis, or the Love of Technology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Lenoir, T. (1994), 'Was the last turn in the right turn? The semiotic turn and A.J. Greimas', Configurations, 1, 119-36.
7. Pinch, T. (1993), 'Turn, turn, and turn again: the Woolgar formula', Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18, 511-22.
8. Schatzki, T., Knorr- Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2000), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9. Woolgar, S. (1991), 'The turn to technology in social studies of science', Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16, 20-50.
10. Amable, B., Barré, R. and Boyer R. (1997), 'Diversity, coherence and transformation of innovation systems', in R. Barré, M. Gibbons, J. Maddox, B. Martin and P. Papon (eds), Science in Tomorrow's Europe, Paris: Economica International, pp. 33-49.
11. Barber, B. and Hirsch, E. (eds) (1962), The Sociology of Science, New York: Free Press.
12. Bernal, J.D. (1939), The Social Function of Science, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13. Grelon, A. (2001), 'Emergence and growth of the engineering profession in Europe in the 19th and early 20th centuries', in P. Goujon and B. Hériard Dubreuil (eds), Technology and Ethics. A European Quest for Responsible Engineering, Leuven: Peeters, pp. 75-9.
14. Grossetti, M. (1994), Université et Territoire. Un système scientifique local, Toulouse et Midi- Pyrénées, Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
15. Pestre, D. (1989), Louis Néel, le magnétisme et Grenoble. Récit de la création d'un empire physicien dans la province française, 1940-1965, Paris: CNRS.
16. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post- critical Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Barber, B. (1961), 'Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery', Science, 134 (3479), 596-602.
18. Barnes, B. and Dolby, R. (1970), 'The scientific ethos: a deviant viewpoint, Archives Européennes de sociologie, XI (1), 3-25.
19. Ben- David, J. (1978), 'Emergence of national traditions in the sociology of science: the United States and Great Britain', Sociological Inquiry, 48 (3-4), 197-218.
20. Box, S. and Cotgrove, S. (1968), 'The productivity of scientists in industrial research laboratories', Sociology, 2, 163-72.
21. Cole, S. (2004), 'Merton's contribution to the sociology of science', Social Studies of Science, 34 (6), 829-44.
22. Cole, S. and Cole, J. (1973), Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Etzkowitz, H. (2004), 'The evolution of the entrepreneurial university', International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1), 64-77.
24. Gaston, J. (1978), The Reward System in British and American Science, New York: Wiley & Sons.
25. Kornhauser, W. (1963), Scientists in Industry, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Lemaine, G., Matalon, B. and Provansal, B. (1969), 'La lutte pour la vie dans la cité scientifique', Revue Française de Sociologie, 10 (1), 139-65.
27. Merton, R. (1938), Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England, New York: Fertig.
28. Merton, R. (1942), 'Science and technology in a democratic order', Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 15-26.
29. Mulkay, M. (1969), 'Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural science, Social Research, 36 (1), 22-52.
30. Nye, M. (1986), Science in the Provinces: Scientific Communities and Provincial Leadership in France, 1860-1930, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31. Ogburn, W. and Thomas, D. (1922), 'Are inventions inevitable?', Political Science Quarterly, 34, 83-98.
32. Sábato, J. (1975), El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática cienciatechnología-desarrollo- dependencia, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
33. Stehr, N. (1976), 'The ethos of science revisited: social and cognitive norms', Sociological Inquiry, 48, 173-96.
34. Stein, M. (1962), 'Creativity and the scientist', in B. Barber and W. Hirsch (eds), The Sociology of Science, New York: Free Press, pp. 329-43.
35. Weingart, P. (1982), 'The scientific power elite: a chimera; the de- institutionalization and politicization of science', in N. Elias, H. Martins and R. Whitley (eds), Scientific Establishment and Hierarchies, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 71-87.
36. Zuckerman, H. (1984), 'Norms and deviant behavior in science', Science, Technology and Human Values, 9 (1), 7-13.
37. Zuckerman, H. and Merton, R. (1971), 'Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system', Minerva, 9, 66-100.
38. Alberts B., White, R.M. and Shine, K. (1994), 'Scientific conduct', Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 3479-80.
39. Barber, B. (1952), Science and the Social Order, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
40. Ben- David, J. and Katz, S. (1982), 'Scientific societies, professional organizations and the creation and dissemination of practical knowledge', Proceedings of the Global Seminar on The Role of Scientific and Engineering Societies in Development, New Delhi, December 1-5, 1980, New Delhi: The Indian National Science Academy, pp. 153-61.
41. Blume, S. and Sinclair, R. (1974), 'Aspects of the structure of a scientific discipline', in R. Whitley (ed.), Social Processes of Scientific Development, London and Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 224-41.
42. Cole, J. and Zuckerman, H. (1975), 'The emergence of a scientific speciality: the self exemplifying case of the sociology of science', in L.A. Coser (ed.), The Idea of Social Structure, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 139-74.
43. Da Matta, R. (1992), 'L'interdisciplinarité dans une perspective anthropologique: quelques réflexions de travail', in E. Portella (ed.), Entre savoirs. L'interdisciplinarité en actes: enjeux, obstacles et résultats, Toulouse: Eres, pp. 57-76.
44. Eisenstein, E. (1979), The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Geison, G. (1981), 'Scientific change, emerging specialties and research schools', History of Science, 19, 20-38.
46. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
47. Gingras, Y. and Godin, B. (2000), 'The place of universities in the system of knowledge production', Research Policy, 29 (2), 273-8.
48. Granovetter, M. (1973), 'The strength of weak ties', American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-80.
49. Menger, P.M. (1997), 'Sociologie et économie', Revue Française de Sociologie, 38, 421-7.
50. Mulkay, M., Gilbert, N. and Woolgar, S. (1975), 'Problem areas and research networks in science', Sociology, 9, 187-203.
51. Mullins, N. (1972), 'The development of a scientific speciality: the Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology', Minerva, 10, 51-82.
52. NAS et al. (1992), Responsible Science, Volume I: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
53. Porter, R. (1977), The Making of Geology: Earth Science in Britain, 1669-1815, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
54. Stehr, N. and Larsen, L. (1972), 'The rise and decline of areas of specialization', American Sociologist, 7 (7), 5-6.
55. Zuckerman, H. and Merton, R. (1972), 'Age, aging and age structure in science', in M. Riley, M. Johnson and A. Foner (eds), A Sociology of Age Stratification, New York: Russell, pp. 292-356.
56. Bowker, G. (1994), Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920-1940, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Laredo, P. and Mustar, P. (2004), 'Public sector research: a growing role in innovation systems', Minerva, 42 (1), 11-27.
58. Latour, B. (1991), 'Le métier de directeur de recherché', in D. Vinck (ed.), Gestion de la recherche. Nouveau problèmes, nouveaux outils, Brussels: De Boeck, pp. 499-520.
59. Picard, J.- F. (1990), La République des savants. La recherche française et le CNRS, Paris: Flammarion.
60. Rosental, C. (1991), Politique scientifique et organisation politique de la science, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation. Paris: École des Mines.
61. Stephan, P. and Levin, S. (2002), 'The importance of implicit contracts in collaborative research', in P. Mirowski, and E.- M. Sent (eds), The New Economics of Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 412-30.
62. Vinck, D. (1996), 'The dynamics of scientific intellectuals within the integrative trend in Europe: the case of co- operation networks', in A. Elzinga and C. Landström (eds), Internationalism and Science, London: Taylor Graham, pp. 162-98.
63. Vinck, D. (1999), 'Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique. Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales', Revue Française de Sociologie, 11 (2), 385-414.
64. Vinck, D., Kahana, B., Laredo, P. and Meyer, J.B. (1993), 'A network approach to studying research programmes: mobilising and coordinating public responses to HIV/AIDS, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 5 (1), 39-54.
65. Allison, P. and Long, J. (1990), 'Departmental effects on scientific productivity', American Sociological Review, 55, 469-78.
66. Barré, R., Hernandez, V., Meyer, J.B. and Vinck, D. (2003), Scientific Diasporas: How Can Developing Countries Benefit from Their Expatriate Scientists and Engineers?, Paris: IRD.
67. Bourdieu, P. (1975), 'The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason', Social Science Information, 14 (6), 19-47.
68. Burt, R. (1992), Structural Holes, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69. Crane, D. (1965), 'Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition', American Sociological Review, 30, 699-713.
70. Dogan, M. (2000), 'Reputation of scholars and scientific specialization', in Special Session on 'Recent Trends in Political Science', Quebec: IPSA, http:// www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/dogan2.html.
71. Elzinga, A. and Landström, C. (1996), Internationalism and Science, London: Taylor Graham.
72. Griffith, B. and Mullins, N. (1972), 'Coherent social groups in scientific change', Science, 177(4053), 959-64.
73. Hackett, E. (2005), 'Essential tensions. Identity, control, and risk in research', Social Studies of Science, 35 (5), 787-826.
74. Hargens, L. and Hagstrom, W.O. (1982), 'Scientific consensus and academic status attainment patterns', Sociology of Education, 55 (4) 183-96.
75. Karpik, L. (1989), 'L'économie de la qualité', Revue française de sociologie, 30 (2), 187-210.
76. Knorr- Cetina, K. (1982), 'Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi- economic models of science', Social Studies of Science, 12 (1) 101-30.
77. Latour, B. and Fabbri, P. (2000), 'The rhetoric of science: authority and duty in an article from the exact sciences', Technostyle, 16, 115-34.
78. Long, J. (1990), 'The origins of sex differences in science', Social Forces, 68, 1297-315.
79. Long, J. (1992), 'Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity', Social Forces, 71, 159-78.
80. Long, J. and McGinnis, R. (1985), 'The effect of the mentor on the academic career', Scientometrics, 7, 255-80.
81. Mangematin, V. (2001), 'Individual careers and collective research: is there a paradox?', International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 670-75.
82. Merton, R. (1968), 'The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered', Science, 159 (3810), 56-63. [This article is reprinted in R.K. Merton (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 439-59.]
83. Merton, R. (1988), 'The Matthew effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property', Isis, 79, 606-23.
84. Meyer, J.B. (2001), 'Network approach vs. brain drain: lessons from the diaspora', International Migration Quarterly Issue, 39 (5), 91-110.
85. Musselin, C. (1997), 'State/university relations and how to change them: the case of France and Germany', European Journal of Education, 32 (2), 145-64.
86. Ortegay Gasset, J. (1932), The Revolt of the Masses, New York: Norton.
87. Ouellet, P. (dir.) (1987), Sciences et Cultures. Pour une anthropologie des sciences et des techniques, Québec: Télé- Université.
88. Reskin, B. (1976), 'Sex differences in status attainment in science: the case of postdoctoral fellowships', American Sociological Review, 41, 597-612.
89. Rip, A. (1988), 'Contextual transformation in contemporary science', in A. Jamison (ed.), Keeping Science Straight: A Critical Look at the Assessment of Science and Technology, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg Press, pp. 59-85.
90. Rip, A. and Nederhof, A. (1985), 'Between dirigisme and laisser- faire: effects of implementing the science policy priority for biotechnology in the Netherlands', Research Policy, 15 (5), 253-68.
91. Rossiter, M. (1993), 'The (Matthew) Matilda effect in science', Social Studies of Science, 23, 325-41.
92. Shinn, T. (1988), 'Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes des recherches', Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 74 (sept) 2-22.
93. Siow, A. (1998), 'Tenure and other unusual personnel practices in academia', Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 14, 152-73.
94. Wagner, I. (2006), 'Coupling careers in intellectual and artistic worlds', Qualitative Sociology Review, 2 (3), 78-98 (online).
95. Wiener, N. (1956), I am a Mathematician. The Later Life of a Prodigy, New York: Doubleday, p. 87.
96. Woolgar, S. (1976), 'The identification and definition of scientific collectivities', in G. Lemaine, R. McLeod, M. Mulkay and P. Weingart (eds), Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, pp. 223-45.
97. Xie, Y. and Shauman, K. (2003), Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Zuckerman H. (1968), 'Patterns of name- ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity', American Journal of Sociology, 74, 275-91.
99. Zuckerman, H., Cole, J. and Bruer, J. (1991), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, New York: Norton.
100. Bachelard, G. (2002), The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge, Manchester: Clinamen. [Original edition in French, 1938.]
101. Barber, B. and Fox, R. (1958), 'The case of the floppy- eared rabbits: an instance of serendipity gained and serendipity lost', American Journal of Sociology, 64 (2), 128-36.
102. Barnes, B. (1981), 'On the "Hows" and "Whys" of cultural change', Social Studies of Science, 11 (3), 481-98.
103. Barnes, B. (1982), T.S. Kuhn and Social Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
104. Beder, S. (1991), 'Controversy and closure: Sydney's beaches in crisis', Social Studies of Science, 21, 223-56.
105. Ben- David, J. (1991), Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
106. Brannigan, A. (1981), The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107. Callon, M. (1980), 'Struggles and negotiations to decide what is problematic and what is not: the socio- logics of translation', in K. Knorr- Cetina, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 197-220.
108. Collins, H. (1981), 'Stages on the empirical programme of relativism', Social Studies of Science, 11(1), pp. 3-10.
109. Darmon, G. (1986), 'The asymmetry of symmetry', Social Science Information, 3 (25), 743-35.
110. Dean, J. (1979), 'Controversy over classification: a case study from the history of botany', in B. Barnes and S. Shapin (eds), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, London and, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 211-30.
111. Dubois, M. (2001), La nouvelle sociologie des sciences, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
112. Duhem, P. (1906), La théorie physique: son object et sa structure, Paris: Chevalier R. Riviè [repr. Paris, Vrin, 1981].
113. Elkana, Y. (1968), The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, London: Hutchinson.
114. Feltz, B. (1991), Croisées biologiques. Systémique et analytique. Écologie et biologie moléculaire en dialogue, Brussells: Ed. CIACO.
115. Feyerabend, P. (1975), Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: Humanities Press.
116. Fleck, L. (1935 [1979]), The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
117. Forman, P. (1980), 'Weimar culture, causality, and quantum theory, 1918-1927. Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment', in C. Chant and J. Fauvel (eds), Darwin to Einstein: Historical Studies on Science and Belief, London: Open University Press; Longman.
118. Freudenthal, G. (1984), 'The role of shared knowledge in science: the failure of the constructivist programme in the sociology of science', Social Studies of Science, 14, 285-95.
119. Freudenthal, G. (1990), 'Science studies in France: a sociological view', Social Studies of Science, 20, 353-69.
120. Galison, P. (1997), Image and Logic. A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
121. Gieryn, T. (1978), 'Problem retention and problem change in science', in J. Gaston (ed.), Sociological Inquiry: The Sociology of Science, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, pp. 96-115.
122. Gieryn, T. (1995), 'Boundaries of sciences', in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage, pp. 393-443.
123. Gooding, D. (1992), 'Putting agency back into experiment', in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 65-112.
124. Hessen, B. (1931), 'The Social and economic roots of Newton's Principia', in N. Butharin, Science at the Crossroads, London, pp. 151-212.
125. Hollis, M. (1988), The Cunning of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
126. Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds) (1982), Rationality and Relativism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
127. Horton, R. (1973), Modes of Thought, London: Faber & Faber.
128. Koyré, A. (1958), From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, New York: Harper.
129. Lakatos, I. (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Latour, B. (1995), 'Pasteur and Pouchet: the heterogenesis of the history of science', in M. Serres (ed.), History of Scientific Thought, London: Blackwell, pp. 526-55.
131. Law, J. (1976), 'The development of specialties in science: the case of X- ray protein crystallography', in G. Lemaine, R. McLeod, M. Mulkay and P. Weingart (eds), Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 123-51.
132. Lemaine, G., Lécuyer, B., Gomis, A. and Barthélemy, C. (1972), Les Voies du succès. Sur quelques facteurs de la réussite des laboratoires de recherche fondamentale en France, Paris: GERS.
133. Lukes, S. (1973), 'On the social determination of truth', in R. Horton (ed.), Modes of Thought, London: Faber & Faber, pp. 230-48.
134. Mannheim, K. (1967), Essays on the Sociology of Culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
135. Masterman, M. (1970), 'The nature of a paradigm', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-89.
136. Mendelsohn, E. and Elkana, Y. (1981), Sciences and Cultures. Anthropological and Historical Studies of the Sciences, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
137. Mulkay, M. (1980), The Sociology of Science in East and West, London: Sage.
138. Pickering, A. (1981), 'The role of interests in high- energy physics: the choice between charm and colour', in K.D. Knorr- Cetina, R. Krohn and R.D. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, Sociology of the Sciences, Vol. 4, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 107-38.
139. Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. (1987), 'The social construction of facts and artifacts, or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other', in W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MlT Press, pp. 17-50.
140. Popper, K. (1972), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson (1st edn 1959).
141. Quine, W. (1974), Two Dogmas of Empiricism, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
142. Rabeharisoa, V. and Callon, M. (2002), 'The involvements of patients' associations in research', International Social Science Journal, 171, 57-65.
143. Raynaud, D. (2003), Sociologie des controverses scientifiques, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
144. Scheler, M. (1926), 'Die Wissenformen und die Gesellschaft' ['The forms of knowledge and society'], Reedt in Collected Works, vol. 8, Berne: Francke Verlag, 1960.
145. Shapin, S. (1979), 'The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes', in R. Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge, Sociological Review Monographs, Vol. xxvii, Keele: Keele University Press, pp. 139-78.
146. Shinn, T. and Ragouet, P. (2005), Controverses sur la science. Pour une sociologie transversaliste de l'activité scientifique, Paris: Raisons d'agir.
147. Sorokin, P. (1957), 'Social and cultural dynamics: a study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships', Boston, MA: Extending Horizons Books, Porter Sargent.
148. Wallis, R. (1985), 'Science and pseudo- science', Social Science Information, 24 (3), 585-601.
149. Wittgenstein, L. (1922 [1961]), Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus, New York: Humanities Press.
150. Wittgenstein, L. (1953 [2001]), Philosophical Investigations, London: Blackwell.
151. Woolgar, S. (1981), 'Interests and explanation in the social study of science', Social Studies of Science, 11 (3), 365-94.
152. Wynne, B. (1976), 'C.G. Barkla and the J phenomenon: a case study in the treatment of deviance in physics', Social Studies of Science, 6, 307-47.
153. Yearley, S. (1996), Sociology, Environment, Globalisation, London: Sage.
154. Znaniecki, F. (1940), The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge, New York: Columbia University Press.
155. Ashmore, M., Myers, G. and Potter, J. (1995), 'Discourse, rhetoric, reflexivity: seven days in the library', in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage, pp. 321-42.
156. Bagla- Gökalp, L. (1996), 'Le chercheur et son instrument', Revue Française de Sociologie, 37 (4), 536-66.
157. Berthelot, J.M. (2003), Les Figures du texte scientifique, Paris: PUF.
158. Bourdieu, P. (2004), Science of Science and Reflexivity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
159. Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C. and Pronovost, D. (1990), 'Representing biotechnology: an ethnography of Quebec science policy', Social Studies of Science, 20, 195-227.
160. Collins, H. (1974), 'The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks', Science Studies, 4, 165-86.
161. Doing, P. (2004), '"Lab Hands"' and the "Scarlet O". Epistemic politics and (scientific) labor', Social Studies of Science, 34 (3), 299-323.
162. Fogelberg, H. and Glimell, H. (2003), Bringing Visibility to the Invisible: Towards a Social Understanding of Nanotechnology, Göteborg: Göteborg University Press.
163. Fujimura, J. (1987), 'Constructing "Do- able" problems in cancer research: articulating alignment', Social Studies of Science, 17, 257-93.
164. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingstone, E. (1981), 'The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-58.
165. Gingras, Y. (2000), 'Pourquoi le programme fort est- il incompris?', Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 109, 235-55.
166. Gooding, D., Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (1989), The Uses of Experiments: Studies in the Natural Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Goody, J. (1977), The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Goody, J. (1986), The Logic of Writing and the Organisation of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
170. Hacking, I. (1999), The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
171. Hubert, M. (2007), 'Hybridations instrumentales et identitaires dans la recherche sur les nanotechnologies. Le cas d'un laboratoire public au travers de ses collaborations académiques et industrielles', Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances, 1 (2), 243-66.
172. Jordan, K. and Lynch, M. (1992), 'The sociology of a genetic engineering technique: ritual and rationality in the performance of the "Plasmid Prep"', in A. Clarke and J. Fujimura (eds), The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 77-114.
173. Jouvenet, M. (2007), 'La culture du "bricolage" instrumental et l'organisation du travail scientifique enquête dans un centre de recherche en nanosciences', Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances, 1 (2), 189-219.
174. Keating, P. and Cambrosio, A. (2003), Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late- twentieth- century Medicine, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
175. Knorr- Cetina, K. (1995), 'Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science', in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London: Sage, pp. 140-66.
176. Knorr- Cetina, K. and Amann, K. (1990), 'Image dissection in natural scientific inquiry', Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 259-83.
177. Latour, B. (1979). 'Go and see: for an anthropological study of working scientists', 4S Newsletter, 4 (winter), 18-20.
178. Latour, B. (1986), 'Visualisation and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands', in H. Kuklick (ed.), Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, Vol. 6, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1-40.
179. Latour, B. (1995), 'The "Pedofil" of Boa Vista: a photo- philosophical montage', Common Knowledge, 4 (1), 147-18.
180. Latour, B. (1996), 'On interobjectivity', Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3-4, 228-45 & 246-69.
181. Law, J. and Williams, R. (1982), 'Putting facts together: a study of scientific persuasion', Social Studies of Science, 4 (12), 535-57.
182. Lemaine, G., Clemeçon, M., Gomis, A., Polun, B. and Salvo, B. (1977), Strategies et choix dans la recherche: à propos des travaux sur le sommeil, The Hague: Mouton.
183. Licoppe, C. (1995), La Formation de la pratique scientifique, Paris: La Découverte.
184. Livingston, E. (1986), The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
185. MacKenzie, D. (1993), 'Negotiating arithmetic, constructing proof: the sociology of mathematics and information technology', Social Studies of Science, 23, 37-65.
186. Merz, M. (1999), 'Multiplex and unfolding: computer simulation in particle physics', Science in Context, 12 (2), 293-316.
187. Mondada, L. and Racine, J.- B. (1999), 'Ways of writing geography', in A. Buttimer, S.D. Brunn and U. Wardenga (eds), Text and Image: Social Construction of Regional Knowledges, Leipzig: Institut für Länderkunde, pp. 266-80.
188. Mulkay, M. (1991), Sociology of Science: A Sociological Pilgrimage, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
189. Pasveer, B. (1989), 'Knoweldge of shadows: the introduction of X- ray images in medicine', Sociology of Health and Illness, 11 (4), 360-80.
190. Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
191. Pickering, A. and Stephanides, A. (1992), 'Constructing quaternions: on the analysis of conceptual practice', in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 139-67.
192. Ravetz, J. (1972), Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems, Oxford: Clarendon.
193. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985), Leviathan and the Air- Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
194. Shinn, T. (1983), 'Construction théorique et démarche expérimentale: essai d'analyse sociale et épistémologique de la recherche', Information sur les sciences sociales, 22 (3), 511-54.
195. Star, S. and Griesemer, J. (1989), 'Institutionnal ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology', Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
196. Vinck, D. (2006), 'L'équipement du chercheur. Comme si la technique était déterminante', Ethnographique.org, 9, February, available at: http://www.ethnographiques.org/documents/article/ArVinck.html.
197. Woolgar, S. (1980), 'Discovery: logic and sequence in a scientific text', in K. Knorr- Cetina, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds), The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, Vol. iv, Sociology of the Sciences, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 239-68.
198. Woolgar, S. (1988), Science, The Very Idea, London: Tavistock.
199. Zenzen, M. and Restivo, S. (1982), 'The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: a study of scientific practice', Social Science Information, 21 (3), 447-73.
200. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004), Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
201. Bonneuil, C., Joly, P.B. and Marris, C. (2008), 'Disentrenching experiment? The construction of GM- crop field trials as a social problem in France', Science Technology and Human Values, 33 (2), 201-29.
202. Callon, M. (1986), 'The sociology of an actor- network: the case of the electric vehicle', in M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip (eds), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 19-34.
203. Callon, M. and Law, J. (1982), 'On interests and their transformation: enrolment and counter- enrolment', Social Studies of Science, 12 (4), 615-25.
204. Callon, M. and Rip, A. (1992), 'Humains, non- humains. Morale d'une coexistence', in J. Theys and B. Kalaora (eds), La Terre outragée. Les experts sont formels, Paris: Autrement, pp. 17-31.
205. Cockburn, C. and First- Dilic, R. (1994), Bringing Technology Home: Women, Gender and Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
206. Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. (1993), Gender and Technology in the Making, London, Sage.
207. Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2002), The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience', Social Studies of Science, 32 (2), 235-96.
208. Deloncle, G. (2004), 'Les logiques sociales de la critique scientifique en sociologie. Une analyse des compte- rendu négatifs dans la Revue française de sociologie, Congrès AISLF, Tours, juillet 2004. Available at: http:docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:cTg71WyLYN0J:mshe.univfcomte.fr/programmation/col04/documents/preactes/Deloncle.pdf+Geoffrey+Deloncle&hl=fr&gl=fr.
209. Desrosières, A. (2002), The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
210. Downey, G. (1992), 'CAD/CAM saves the nation? Toward an anthropology of technology', Knowledge and Society, 9, 143-68.
211. Ellul, J. (1980), The Technological System, New York: Continuum.
212. Epstein, S. (1995), 'The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials', Science, Technology and Human Values, 20, 403-37.
213. Etzkowitz, H.I. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000), 'The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations', Research Policy, 29 (2), 109-23.
214. Gille, B. (1986), The History of Techniques, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
215. Granjou, C. (2003), 'L'expertise scientifique à destination politique', Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 114, 175-83.
216. Granjou, C. (2004), 'La gestion du risque: entre technique et politique. Comités d'experts et dispositifs de traçabilité à travers les exemples de la vache folle et des OGM', PhD in Sociology, Université René Descartes (Paris V), Paris.
217. Habermas, J. (1970), 'Technology and science as ideology', in J. Habermas, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, pp. 81-122.
218. Habermas, J. (1971), Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
219. Hughes, T. (1983), Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
220. Jasanoff, S. (1987), 'Contested boundaries in policy relevant science', Social Studies of Science, 17, 195-230.
221. Jasanoff, S. (1990), The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
222. Jasanoff, S. (2002), 'Citizens at risk: cultures of modernity in the US and EU', Science as Culture, 11 (3), 363-80.
223. Joly, P.B. (2007), 'Scientific expertise in public arenas - lessons from the French experience', Journal of Risk Research, 10 (7), 905-24.
224. Lagadec, P. (1982), Major Technological Risk: An Assessment of Industrial Disasters, London: Elsevier.
225. Latour, B. (1982), 'Le centre et la périphérie à propos des transferts de technologies', Prospective et santé publique, 24, 37-44.
226. Latour, B. (1983), 'Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world', in K. Knorr- Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds), Science Observed, London: Sage, pp. 141-70.
227. Law, J. (1987), 'Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering: the case of the Portuguese expansion', in W. Bijker, T. Pinch and T.P. Hughes (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-34.
228. Lévy- Leblond, J.M. and Jaubert, A. (1972), (Auto)critique de la science, Paris: Seuil.
229. Marcuse, H. (1964), One- dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Boston, MA: Beacon.
230. Marris, C., Joly, P.B. and Rip, A. (2008), 'Interactive technology assessment in the real world: dual dynamics in an iTA exercise on genetically modified vines', Science, Technology and Human Values, 33 (1), 77-100.
231. Marris, C., Joly, P.B., Ronda, S. and Bonneuil, C. (2005), 'How the French GM controversy led to the reciprocal emancipation of scientific expertise and policy making', Science and Public Policy, 32 (4), 301-8.
232. Millstone, E. and van Zwanenberg, P. (2000), 'Beyond skeptical relativism: evaluating the social constructions of expert risk assessments', Science, Technology and Human Values, 25 (3), 259-82.
233. Mumford, L. (1934), Technics and Civilization, New York: Harcourt Brace.
234. Nelkin, D. and Pollak, M. (1981), The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
235. Noble, D. (1984), Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York: Knopf.
236. Oudshoorn, N. (1994), Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
237. Pestre, D. (1984), Physique et physiciens en France (1918-1940), Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines.
238. Pestre, D. (2003), 'Regimes of knowledge production in society: towards a more political and social reading', Minerva, 41 (3), 245-61.
239. Roqueplo, P. (1974), Le Partage du savoir: science, culture, vulgarisation, Paris: Seuil.
240. Roqueplo, P. (1997), Entre savoir et décision. L'expertise scientifique, Paris: INRA.
241. Rose, H. and Rose, S. (1970), Science and Society, London: Penguin.
242. Shinn, T. (2002a), 'The transverse science and technology culture: dynamics and roles of research technology', Social Science Information, 41 (2), 207-51.
243. Shinn, T. (2002b), 'The triple helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology', Social Studies of Science, 32 (4), 599-614.
244. Simondon, G. (1959), On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, London, ON: University of Western Ontario Press.
245. Weingart, P. (1999), 'Scientific expertise and political acountability: paradoxes of sciences in politics', Science and Public Policy, 26 (3), 151-61.
246. Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
247. Wynne, B. (1992), 'Science and social responsibility', in J. Ansel and F. Wharton (eds), Risk: Analysis, Assessment and Management, New York: John Wiley, pp. 137-52.
248. Boudon, R. and Clavelin, M. (eds) (1994), Le Relativisme est- il résistible? Regards sur la sociologie des sciences, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
249. Fuller, S. (1988), Social Epistemology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
250. Kreimer, P. (1997), 'L'universel et le contexte dans la recherche scientifique', Doctoral thesis, CNAM, Paris.
251. Shadish, W. and Fuller, S. (1994), The Social Psychology of Science, New York and London: Guilford Press. raja4