Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 151-161

  Weingart, Peter ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLICY MAKING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0032835518     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154399781782437     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. D Bell (1960), The End of Ideology (Free Press, Glencoe, III). BMFT-Journal (1984). 2, page 11.
2. S Boehmer-Christiansen (1995), "Reflections on scientific advice and EC transboundary pollution policy, Science and Public Policy, 22(3), June, pages 195-203.
3. S E Cozzens and E J Woodhouse (1995), "Science, government, and the politics of knowledge", in Jasanoff et al (1995, pages 533-553).
4. U DiFabio (1990), "Verwaltungsentscheidung durch externen Sachverstand", Verwaltungsarchiv, 81, pages 193-227.
5. P Weingart (1991), "Large technical systems, real-life experiments, and the legitimation trap of technology assessment: the contribution of science and technology to constituting risk perception", in T R LaPorte, Social Responses to Large Technical Systems, Control or Anticipation (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pages 5-17.
6. White House Press Release (1951), 20 April, cited in J L Penick et al (editors), The Politics of American Science, 1939 to the Present (Rand McNally, Chicago) page 182.
7. P M Wiedemann (1993), "Tabu, Sünde, Risiko: Veränderungen der gesellschaftlichen Wahrnehmung von Gefährdungen", in Bayerische Rück (editor), Risiko ist ein Konstrukt - Wahrnehmungen zur Risikowahmefimung (Knesebeck, Munich) pages 43-67.
8. H Willke (1992), Ironie des Staates, Grundlinien einer Staatstheorie polyzentrischer Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt).