Temporal integration of visual signals in lens compensation (a review)

Experimental Eye Research

Volumn 114, Issue , 2013, Pages 69-76

  Zhu, Xiaoying ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial length; Choroid; Emmetropization; Hyperopia; Myopia; Temporal integration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; DARKNESS; EMMETROPIA; GROWTH; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; LENS; LENS POWER; LIGHT EXPOSURE; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; THICKNESS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

AXIAL LENGTH; CHOROID; EMMETROPIZATION; HYPEROPIA; MYOPIA; TEMPORAL INTEGRATION;

ANIMALS; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; CHICKENS; EMMETROPIA; EYE; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MYOPIA; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 84881318528     PISSN: 00144835     EISSN: 10960007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anstice N.S., Phillips J.R. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology 2011, 118:1152-1161.
2. Benavente-Perez A., Nour A., Troilo D. The effect of simultaneous negative and positive defocus on eye growth and development of refractive state in marmosets. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53:6479-6487.
3. Chakraborty R., Read S.A., Collins M.J. Monocular myopic defocus and daily changes in axial length and choroidal thickness of human eyes. Exp. Eye Res. 2012, 103:47-54.
4. Crewther D.P., Crewther S.G. Refractive compensation to optical defocus depends on the temporal profile of luminance modulation of the environment. Neuroreport 2002, 13:1029-1032.
5. Crewther S.G., Crewther D.P. Inhibition of retinal ON/OFF systems differentially affects refractive compensation to defocus. Neuroreport 2003, 14:1233-1237.
6. Crewther S.G., Barutchu A., Murphy M.J., Crewther D.P. Low frequency temporal modulation of light promotes a myopic shift in refractive compensation to all spectacle lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 83:322-328.
7. Diether S., Schaeffel F. Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation. Vis. Res. 1997, 37:659-668.
8. Diether S., Wildsoet C.F. Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46:2242-2252.
9. Feldkaemper M.P., Schaeffel F. Evidence for a potential role of glucagon during eye growth regulation in chicks. Vis. Neurosci. 2002, 19:755-766.
10. Fischer A.J., McGuire J.J., Schaeffel F., Stell W.K. Light- and focus-dependent expression of the transcription factor ZENK in the chick retina. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:706-712.
11. Fischer A.J., Ritchey E.R., Scott M.A., Wynne A. Bullwhip neurons in the retina regulate the size and shape of the eye. Dev. Biol. 2008, 317:196-212.
12. Flitcroft D.I. Amodel of the contribution of oculomotor and optical factors to emmetropization and myopia [published erratum appears in Vision Res 1999 Mar; 39 (5): 1049]. Vis. Res. 1998, 38:2869-2879.
13. Flitcroft D.I. The lens paradigm in experimental myopia: oculomotor, optical and neurophysiological considerations. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 1999, 19:103-111.
14. Ganesan P., Wildsoet C.F. Pharmaceutical intervention for myopia control. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2010, 5:759-787.
15. Gottlieb M.D., Fugate-Wentzek L.A., Wallman J. Different visual deprivations produce different ametropias and different eye shapes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1987, 28:1225-1235.
16. Howlett M.H., McFadden S.A. Form-deprivation myopia in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Vis. Res. 2006, 46:267-283.
17. Howlett M.H., McFadden S.A. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig. Vis. Res. 2009, 49:219-227.
18. Hung L.F., Crawford M.L., Smith E.L. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat. Med. 1995, 1:761-765.
19. Hung L.F., Wallman J., Smith E.L. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41:1259-1269.
20. Irving E.L., Sivak J.G., Callender M.G. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 1992, 12:448-456.
21. Kee C.S., Marzani D., Wallman J. Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42:575-583.
22. Kee C.S., Hung L.F., Qiao-Grider Y., Ramamirtham R., Winawer J., Wallman J., Smith E.L. Temporal constraints on experimental emmetropization in infant monkeys. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48:957-962.
23. Liu Y., Wildsoet C. The effect of two-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52:1078-1086.
24. McBrien N.A., Arumugam B., Metlapally S. The effect of daily transient+4 D positive lens wear on the inhibition of myopia in the tree shrew. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53:1593-1601.
25. McFadden S.A., Howlett M.H., Mertz J.R. Retinoic acid signals the direction of ocular elongation in the guinea pig eye. Vis. Res. 2004, 44:643-653.
26. McLean R.C., Wallman J. Severe astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44:449-457.
27. Mertz J.R., Wallman J. Choroidal retinoic acid synthesis: a possible mediator between refractive error and compensatory eye growth. Exp. Eye Res. 2000, 70:519-527.
28. Mutti D.O., Mitchell G.L., Moeschberger M.L., Jones L.A., Zadnik K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43:3633-3640.
29. Napper G.A., Brennan N.A., Barrington M., Squires M.A., Vessey G.A., Vingrys A.J. The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vis. Res. 1995, 35:1337-1344.
30. Nickla D.L. Transient increases in choroidal thickness are consistently associated with brief daily visual stimuli that inhibit ocular growth in chicks. Exp. Eye Res. 2007, 84:951-959.
31. Nickla D.L., Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Exp. Eye Res. 1998, 66:163-181.
32. Nickla D.L., Wilken E., Lytle G., Yom S., Mertz J. Inhibiting the transient choroidal thickening response using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor l-NAME prevents the ameliorative effects of visual experience on ocular growth in two different visual paradigms. Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 83:456-464.
33. Nickla D.L., Totonelly K., Dhillon B. Dopaminergic agonists that result in ocular growth inhibition also elicit transient increases in choroidal thickness in chicks. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 91:715-720.
34. Norton T.T., Rada J.A. Reduced extracellular matrix in mammalian sclera with induced myopia. Vis. Res. 1995, 35:1271-1281.
35. Norton T.T., Siegwart J.T., Amedo A.O. Effectiveness of hyperopic defocus, minimal defocus, or myopic defocus in competition with a myopiagenic stimulus in tree shrew eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47:4687-4699.
36. Ohngemach S., Feldkaemper M., Schaeffel F. Pineal control of the dopamine D2-receptor gene and dopamine release in the retina of the chicken and their possible relation to growth rhythms of the eye. J.Pineal Res. 2001, 31:145-154.
37. Park T., Winawer J., Wallman J. Further evidence that chicks use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation. Vis. Res. 2003, 43:1519-1531.
38. Phillips J.R. Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 89:1196-1200.
39. Rosenfield M., Gilmartin B. Myiopia and Nearwork: causation or merely association?. Myopia and Nearwork 1998, 193-206. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. M. Rosenfield, B. Gilmartin (Eds.).
40. Sankaridurg P., Holden B., Smith E., Naduvilath T., Chen X., de la Jara P.L., Martinez A., Kwan J., Ho A., Frick K., Ge J. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52:9362-9367.
41. Saw S.M., Katz J., Schein O.D., Chew S.J., Chan T.K. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol. Rev. 1996, 18:175-187.
42. Saw S.M., Wu H.M., Seet B., Wong T.Y., Yap E., Chia K.S., Stone R.A., Lee L. Academic achievement, close up work parameters, and myopia in Singapore military conscripts. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001, 85:855-860.
43. Saw S.M., Chua W.H., Hong C.Y., Wu H.M., Chan W.Y., Chia K.S., Stone R.A., Tan D. Nearwork in early-onset myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43:332-339.
44. Schaeffel F., Glasser A., Howland H.C. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vis. Res. 1988, 28:639-657.
45. Schaeffel F., Burkhardt E., Howland H.C., Williams R.W. Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2004, 81:99-110.
46. Schmid K.L., Wildsoet C.F. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vis. Res. 1996, 36:1023-1036.
47. Schwahn H.N., Schaeffel F. Flicker parameters are different for suppression of myopia and hyperopia. Vis. Res. 1997, 37:2661-2673.
48. Seko Y., Shimokawa H., Tokoro T. Invivo and invitro association of retinoic acid with form-deprivation myopia in the chick. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 63:443-452.
49. Shaikh A.W., Siegwart J.T., Norton T.T. Effect of interrupted lens wear on compensation for a minus lens in tree shrews. Optom. Vis. Sci. 1999, 76:308-315.
50. Sherman S.M., Norton T.T., Casagrande V.A. Myopia in the lid-sutured tree shrew (Tupaia glis). Brain Res. 1977, 124:154-157.
51. Siegwart J.T., Norton T.T. The susceptible period for deprivation-induced myopia in tree shrew. Vis. Res. 1998, 38:3505-3515.
52. Smith E.L., Hung L.F., Kee C.S., Qiao Y. Effects of brief periods of unrestricted vision on the development of form-deprivation myopia in monkeys. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43:291-299.
53. Tan N.W., Saw S.M., Lam D.S., Cheng H.M., Rajan U., Chew S.J. Temporal variations in myopia progression in Singaporean children within an academic year. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2000, 77:465-472.
54. Tejedor J., de la Villa P. Refractive changes induced by form deprivation in the mouse eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44:32-36.
55. Troilo D., Judge S.J. Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vis. Res. 1993, 33:1311-1324.
56. Troilo D., Wallman J. The regulation of eye growth and refractive state: an experimental study of emmetropization. Vis. Res. 1991, 31:1237-1250.
57. Troilo D., Nickla D.L., Wildsoet C.F. Choroidal thickness changes during altered eye growth and refractive state in a primate. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41:1249-1258.
58. Tse D.Y., Lam C.S., Guggenheim J.A., Lam C., Li K.K., Liu Q., To C.H. Simultaneous defocus integration during refractive development. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48:5352-5359.
59. Vessey K.A., Lencses K.A., Rushforth D.A., Hruby V.J., Stell W.K. Glucagon receptor agonists and antagonists affect the growth of the chick eye: a role for glucagonergic regulation of emmetropization?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46:3922-3931.
60. Vessey K.A., Rushforth D.A., Stell W.K. Glucagon- and secretin-related peptides differentially alter ocular growth and the development of form-deprivation myopia in chicks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46:3932-3942.
61. von Noorden G.K., Crawford M.L. Lid closure and refractive error in macaque monkeys. Nature 1978, 272:53-54.
62. Wallman J., Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 2004, 43:447-468.
63. Wallman J., Gottlieb M.D., Rajaram V., Fugate-Wentzek L.A. Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia. Science 1987, 237:73-77.
64. Wallman J., Wildsoet C., Xu A., Gottlieb M.D., Nickla D.L., Marran L., Krebs W., Christensen A.M. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vis. Res. 1995, 35:37-50.
65. Wensveen J.M., Harwerth R.S., Hung L.F., Ramamirtham R., Kee C.S., Smith E.L. Brief daily periods of unrestricted vision can prevent form-deprivation amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47:2468-2477.
66. Whatham A.R., Judge S.J. Compensatory changes in eye growth and refraction induced by daily wear of soft contact lenses in young marmosets. Vis. Res. 2001, 41:267-273.
67. Wiesel T.N., Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature 1977, 266:66-68.
68. Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vis. Res. 1995, 35:1175-1194.
69. Winawer J., Wallman J. Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. Vis. Res. 2002, 42:2651-2668.
70. Winawer J., Zhu X., Choi J., Wallman J. Ocular compensation for alternating myopic and hyperopic defocus. Vis. Res. 2005, 45:1667-1677.
71. Woodman E.C., Read S.A., Collins M.J. Axial length and choroidal thickness changes accompanying prolonged accommodation in myopes and emmetropes. Vis. Res. 2012, 72:34-41.
72. Zhu X., Wallman J. Opposite effects of glucagon and insulin on compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50:24-36.
73. Zhu X., Wallman J. Temporal properties of compensation for positive and negative spectacle lenses in chicks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50:37-46.
74. Zhu X., Winawer J., Wallman J. The potency of myopic defocus in lens-compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44:2818-2827.
75. Zhu X., Park T.W., Winawer J., Wallman J. In a matter of minutes, the eye can know which way to grow. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46:2238-2241.