The lens paradigm in experimental myopia: Oculomotor, optical and neurophysiological considerations

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 103-111

  Flitcroft, D I ^a  

^a Institute of Ophthalmology   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; EYE DEVELOPMENT; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; LENS; MYOPIA; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; RETINA RECEPTIVE FIELD;

EID: 0032993011     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00432.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Atkinson J., Braddick O., Bobier B., et al. Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo and videorefractive screening. Eye. 10:1996;189-198.
2. Charman W. N., Tucker J. Accommodation as a function of object form. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 55:1978;84-92.
3. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J. Physiol. (London). 187:1966;517-552.
4. Field D. J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. [A]. 4:1966;94-2379.
5. Flitcroft D. I. The interactions between chromatic aberrations, defocus and stimulus chromaticity: implications for visual physiology and colorimetry. Vision Res. 29:1989;349-360.
6. Flitcroft D. I. A neural and computational model for the chromatic control of accommodation. Vis. Neurosci. 5:1990;547-555.
7. Flitcroft D. I. A model of the contribution of oculomotor and optical factors to emmetropization and myopia. Vision Res. 38:1998;2869-2879.
8. Hawken M. J., Parker A. J. Spatial properties of neurons in the monkey striate cortex. Proc. Roy. Soc. B (London). 231:1987;251-288.
9. Hoyt C. S., Stone R. D., Fromer C., Billdon F. A. Monocular axial myopia associated with neonatal eyelid closure in human infants. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 91:1981;197-200.
10. Hung G. K. Fixation disparity under open- and closed-loop accommodation. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 10:1990;211-214.
11. Hopkins H. H. The frequency response of a defocused optical system. Proc. R. Soc. 231A:1990;91-103.
12. Hung G. K. Linear model of accommodation and vergence can account for discrepancies between AC/A measures using the fixation disparity and phoria methods. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 11:1991;275-278.
13. Hung G. K. Quantitative analysis of the accommodation convergence to accommodation ratio: linear and non-linear static models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin. 44:1997;306-316.
14. Hung G. K., Semmlow J. L. Static behaviour of accommodation and vergence: computer simulation of an interactive dual feedback system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27:1980;439-447.
15. Hung G. K., Ciuffreda K. J., Rosenfield M. Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;31-41.
16. Hung L. F., Crawford M. L. J., Smith E. L. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Med. 1:1995;761-765.
17. Ingram R. M., Arnold P. E., Dally S., Lucas J. Emmetropisation, squint, and reduced visual acuity after treatment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 75:1990;414-416.
18. Irving E. L., Callender M. G., Sivak J. G. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom. Vis. Sci. 68:1991;364-368.
19. Judge S. J., Graham B. Differential ocular growth of infant marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) induced by optical anisometropia combined with alternating occlusion. J. Physiol. (London). 485:1995;27P.
20. Kolb H. Amacrine cells of the mammalian retina:neurocircuitry and functional roles. Eye. 11:1997;904-923.
21. Kotulak J. C., Schor C. M. A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation. Biological Cybernetics. 54:1986;189-194.
22. McFadden S., Wallman J. Guinea pig eye growth compensates for spectacle lenses. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 36:(Suppl.):1995;758.
23. Norton T. T., Siegwart J. T. Local myopia produced by partial visual-field deprivation in tree shrew. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 17:1991;558.
24. Over R., Moore D. Spatial acuity of the chicken. Brain Res. 211:1981;424-426.
25. Raviola E., Wiesel T. N. An animal model of myopia. N. Engl. J. Med. 312:1985;1609-1615.
26. Rodieck R. W. Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Res. 5:1965;583-601.
27. Saunders K. J., Woodhouse J. M., Westall C. A. Emmetropisation in human infancy: rate of change is related to initial refractive error. Vision Res. 35:1995;1325-1328.
28. Schaeffel F., Bartmann M., Hagel G., Zrenner E. Studies on the role of the retinal dopamine/melatonin system in experimental refractive errors in chickens. Vision Res. 35:1995;1247-1264.
29. Schaeffel F., Glasser A., Howland H. C. Accommodation, refractive error, and eye growth in chickens. Vision Research. 28:1988;639-657.
30. Schmid K. L., Wildsoet C. F. Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks. Vision Res. 37:1997;2011-2021.
31. Schmid K. L., Wildsoet C. F. Hard contact lenses alter accommodative gain but do not prevent refractive adaptation in chicks. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;20-27.
32. Schor C. M. Models of mutual interactions between accommodation and convergence. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 62:1985;369-374.
33. Siegwart J. T., Norton T. T. Refractive and ocular changes in tree shrews raised with plus or minus lenses. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 34:(Suppl.):1993;1208.
34. Smith E. L. Performance characteristics of the emmetropization process in macaque monkeys. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 39:(Suppl.):1998;460.
35. Stone R. A., Laties A. M., Fernandes A., Tigges M. Spectacles and young eyes. Nature Medicine. 2:1996;610-611.
36. Stone R. A., Laties A. M., Raviola E., Wiesel T. N. Increase in retinal vasoactive intestinal polypeptide after eyelid fusion in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;257-260.
37. Troilo D., Gottlieb M. D., Wallman J. Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Curr. Eye Res. 6:1987;993-999.
38. Wallman J., Gottlieb M. D., Rajaram V., Fugate-Wentzek L. A. Local retinal regions control eye growth and myopia. Science. 237:1987;73-77.
39. Wallman J., Turkel J., Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest changes in early visual experience. Science. 201:1978;1249-1251.
40. Wallman J., Wildsoet C., Xu A., Gottlieb M. D., Nickla D. L., Marran L., Krebs W., Christensen A. M. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 35:1995;37-50.
41. Wiesel T. N., Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature. 266:1977;66-68.
42. Wildsoet C. F., Pettigrew J. D. Experimental myopia and anomalous eye growth patterns unaffected by optic nerve section in chickens: evidence for local control of eye growth. Clin. Vis. Sci. 3:1988;99-107.
43. Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms for compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Research. 35:1995;1175-1194.
44. Young F. A. The effect of restricted space on the primate eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 52:1961;799-806.