Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 1519-1531

  Park, Tae Woo ^a   Winawer, Jonathan ^a   Wallman, Josh ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Choroid; Defocus; Emmetropization; Hyperopia; Myopia; Ocular refraction

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CHOROID; CONTROLLED STUDY; LENS POWER; NONHUMAN; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTION INDEX; SPECTACLES; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 0037648332     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00180-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bartmann M., Schaeffel F. A simple mechanism for emmetropization without cues from accommodation or colour. Vision Research. 34:1994;873-876.
2. Coletta N.J., Marcos S., Wildsoet C., Troilo D. Double-pass measurement of retinal image quality in the chicken eye. Optometry and Visual Science. 80:2003;50-57.
3. Glickstein M., Millodot M. Retinoscopy and eye size. Science. 168:1970;605-606.
4. Hughes A. The artefact of retinoscopy in the rat and rabbit eye has its origin at the retina/vitreous interface rather than in longitudinal chromatic aberration. Vision Research. 19:1979;1293-1294.
5. Hung G.K., Ciuffreda K.J. A unifying theory of refractive error development. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 62:2000;1087-1108.
6. Irving E.L., Callender M.G., Sivak J.G. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optometry and Visual Science. 68:1991;364-368.
7. Irving E.L., Sivak J.G., Callender M.G. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 12:1992;448-456.
8. Kee C.S., Marzani D., Wallman J. Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 42:2001;575-583.
9. Marzani D., Wallman J. Growth of the two layers of the chick sclera is modulated reciprocally by visual conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38:1997;1726-1739.
10. McLean R.C., Wallman J. Severe astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 44:2003;449-457.
11. Napper G.A., Brennan N.A., Barrington M., Squires M.A., Vessey G.A., Vingrys A.J. The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vision Research. 35:1995;1337-1344.
12. Nevin S.T., Schmid K.L., Wildsoet C.F. Sharp vision: a prerequisite for compensation to myopic defocus in the chick? Current Eye Research. 17:1998;322-331.
13. Nickla D.L., Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Experimental Eye Research. 66:1998;163-181.
14. Norton T.T., Siegwart J.T. Jr. Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 66:1995;405-414.
15. Park T., Winawer J., Wallman J. In a matter of minutes the eye can know which way to grow. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 42:2001;S55.
16. Rohrer B., Schaeffel F., Zrenner E. Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: results from the chicken eye. Journal of Physiology. 449:1992;363-376.
17. Schaeffel F., Diether S. The growing eye: an autofocus system that works on very poor images. Vision Research. 39:1999;1585-1589.
18. Schaeffel F., Glasser A., Howland H.C. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Research. 28:1988;639-657.
19. Schaeffel F., Howland H.C. Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken. Vision Research. 31:1991;717-734.
20. Schaeffel F., Howland H.C., Farkas L. Natural accommodation in the growing chicken. Vision Research. 26:1986;1977-1993.
21. Schaeffel F., Troilo D., Wallman J., Howland H.C. Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Visual Neuroscience. 4:1990;177-183.
22. Schmid K.L., Wildsoet C.F. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vision Research. 36:1996;1023-1036.
23. Schwahn H.N., Schaeffel F. Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 35:1994;3516-3524.
24. Shaikh A.W., Siegwart J.T., Norton T.T. Jr. Effect of interrupted lens wear on compensation for a minus lens in tree shrews. Optometry and Visual Science. 76:1999;308-315.
25. Smith E.L. 3rd, Hung L.F. Form-deprivation myopia in monkeys is a graded phenomenon. Vision Research. 40:2000;371-381.
26. Smith E.L. 3rd, Hung L.F., Kee C.S., Qiao Y. Effects of brief periods of unrestricted vision on the development of form-deprivation myopia in monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43:2002;291-299.
27. Thibos L.N., Cheng X., Phillips J., Collins A. Astigmatic deprivation of chicks produces myopia, but not astigmatism. ARVO. 42:2001;S58.
28. Troilo D., Lin T., Howland H.C. Negative accommodation occurs in the chick and may be mediated by sympathetic output. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (ARVO Supplement). 34:1993;1310.
29. Wallman J., Adams J.I. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Research. 27:1987;1139-1163.
30. Wallman J., Wildsoet C., Xu A., Gottlieb M.D., Nickla D.L., Marran L., Krebs W., Christensen A.M. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Research. 35:1995;37-50.
31. Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Research. 35:1995;1175-1194.
32. Wildsoet C.F., Howland H.C., Falconer S., Dick K. Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick. Vision Research. 33:1993;1593-1603.
33. Wilson B.J., Decker K.E., Roorda A. Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction. Journal of Optical Society of America A: Optical Image and Science Vision. 19:2002;833-839.
34. Winawer J., Wallman J. Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. Vision Research. 42:2002;2651-2668.
35. Winawer J.A., Zhu X., Park T., Wallman J. Is myopic blur more important than sharp vision for positive-lens compensation? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (ARVO Supplement). 41:2000;S136.
36. Woods R.L., Bradley A., Atchison D.A. Monocular diplopia caused by ocular aberrations and hyperopic defocus. Vision Research. 36:1996;3597-3606.
37. Zhu, X., Winawer, J., & Wallman, J. (2003). The potency of myopic defocus in lens compensation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (in press).
38. Zhu, X., Winawer, J. A., Choi, J. W., & Wallman, J. (2002). The effect of defocusing lenses depends on the temporal integration characteristics of the emmetropization mechanism. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (ARVO Supplement), presentation 2929.