Severe astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 449-457

  McLean, Rhondalyn C ^a   Wallman, Josh ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CHICKEN; CHOROID; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; HYPERMETROPIA; IMAGE DISPLAY; MYOPIA; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SPECTACLES; VISUAL SYSTEM; VITREOUS BODY;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; ASTIGMATISM; CHICKENS; EYE; EYEGLASSES; HYPEROPIA; MYOPIA; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037308495     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.01-0670     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error, and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res. 1988;28:639-657.
2. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992;12:448-456.
3. Hung L-F, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat Med. 1995;1:761-765.
4. Smith E, Hung L. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 1999;39:1415-1435.
5. Siegwart JT, Norton TF. Refractive and ocular changes in tree shrews raised with plus or minus lenses [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(4):S1208. Abstract nr 2482.
6. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 1995;35:37-50.
7. Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res. 1995;35:1175-1194.
8. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr. Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66:405-414.
9. Bartmann M, Schaeffel F. A simple mechanism for emmetropization without cues from accommodation or colour. Vision Res. 1994;34:873-876.
10. Smith EL III, Hung LF. Form-deprivation myopia in monkeys is a graded phenomenon. Vision Res. 2000;40:371-381.
11. Raasch TW. Spherocylindrical refractive errors and visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:272-275.
12. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:367-375.
13. Laskowski FH, Howland HC. Effect of experimentally simulated astigmatism on eye growth and refractive development in chicks [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(3):S687. Abstract nr 3140.
14. Gwiazda J, Grice K, Held R, et al. Astigmatism and the development of myopia in children. Vision Res. 2000;40:1019-1026.
15. Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG. Inducing ametropias in hatchling chicks by defocus: aperture effects and cylindrical lenses. Vision Res. 1995;35:1165-1174.
16. Smith EL Jr, Hung LF. Form-deprivation myopia in monkeys is a graded phenomenon. Vision Res. 2000;40:371-381.
17. Nickla D, Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66:163-181.
18. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987;27:1139-1163.
19. Thibos LN, Cheng X, Phillips J, et al. Astigmatic deprivation of chicks produces myopia, but not astigmatism [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(4):S58. Abstract nr 324.
20. Schmid K, Wildsoet CF. Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick. Exp Eye Res. 1997;64:837-847.
21. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve-section in chicks. Vision Res. 1996;36:1023-1036.
22. Smith EL III, Huang J, Hung L-F. Cylindrical spectacle lenses alter emmetropization and produce astigmatism in young monkeys. In: Tokoro T, ed. Myopia Updates. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Myopia. Tokyo: Springer, 1998:336-343.
23. Kee C-S, Hung L-F, Qiao Y, et al. Does the axis of astigmatism influence the effects of astigmatism on emmetropization in rhesus monkeys [ARVO Abstract]? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(4): S738. Abstract nr 3932.
24. Woods RL, Bradley A, Atchison DA. Monocular diplopia caused by ocular aberrations and hyperopic defocus. Vision Res. 1996;36:3597-606.
25. Winawer J, Wallman J. Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. Vision Res. 2002;42:2651-2668.
26. Winawer JA, Zhu X, Park T, et al. Is myopic blur more important than sharp vision for positive-lens compensation [ARVO Abstract]? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(4):S136. Abstract nr 698.
27. Zhu X, Winawer JA, Choi JW, et al. The effect of defocusing lenses depends on the temporal integration characteristics of the emmetropization mechanism [abstract]. 2002 Annual Meeting Abstract and Program Planner accessed at www.arvo.org. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Abstract 2929.