Teaching activities and language use in science classrooms: Categories and levels of analysis as tools for interpretation

Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrosspective and Prospecctive

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 181-202

  Odegaard, Marianne ^a   Klette, Kirsti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84980573481     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Alexander, R. (2000). Culture & Pedagogy. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
2. Alexander, R. (2006). Education as Dialogue: moral and pedagogical choices for a runaway world. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education in conjunction with Dialogos.
3. Arnesen, N. E., & Odegaard, M. (2006). Categories for video analysis of science classroom activities. Oslo: University of Oslo.
4. Aukrust, V. G. (2003). Samtaledeltakelse i norske klasserom - en studie av deltakerstrukturer og samtalebevegelser. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97. Synteserapport. Oslo: Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
5. Bakhtin, M. (1953/1980). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6. Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Rosen, H. (1969). Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
7. Bergem, O. K. (2009). Individuelle versus kollektive arbeidsformer. En drafting av aktuelle utfordringer i matematikkundervisningen i grunnskolen. [Individual versus collective work. A discussion of current challenges in mathematics teaching in lower secondary classrooms]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
8. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist? New York: Taylor and Francis, Inc.
10. Dysthe, O. (1995). Det flerstemmige klasserommet.[The multivoiced classroom] Oslo: Ad Notam/Gyldendal.
11. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.
12. Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205-223.
13. Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Pell, T., & Wall, D. (1999). Inside the Primary Classroom: 20 Years On. London: Routledge.
14. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Jorde, P. (1986). Early Childhood Education: Issues and Trends. The Educational Forum, 50(2), 171-181.
16. Juzwik, M. M., Nystrand, M., Kelly, S., & Sherry, M. B. (2008). Oral narrative genres as dialogic resources for classroom literature study: A contextualized case study. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1111-1155.
17. Klette, K. (2009). Challenges in Strategies for Complexity Reduction in Video Studies. Experiences from the PISA+ Study: A Video Study of Teaching and Learning in Norway. In T. J. T. Seidel (Ed.), The power of videostudies. Berlin: Waxmann Publishing.
18. Klette, K. (2010). Blindness to change during processes of change: What do educational researchers learn from classroom studies?. In A. L. A. Hargreaves, and M. Fullan (Ed.), Second International Handbook of Educational Change: Springer.
19. Klette, K. (Ed.). (2003). Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97. Synteserapport. Oslo: Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
20. Klette, K., Lie, S., Anmarkrud, O., Arnesen, N., Bergem, O. K., Odegaard, M., et al. (2005). Categories for video analysis of classroom activities with a focus on the teacher. Oslo: University of Oslo.
21. Klette, K., Lie, S., Odegaard, M., Anmarkrud, O., Arnesen, N., Bergem, O. K., et al. (2008). Rapport om forskningsprosjektet PISA+ (Pluss: Prosjekt om Lærings- og Undervisnings-Strategier i Skole). Oslo.
22. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking Science. Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
23. Lemke, J. (2000). Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(4), 273-290.
24. Lie, S., Kjærnsli, M., Roe, A., & Turmo, A. (2001). Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15-àringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.
25. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
26. Nespor, J. (2004). Educational scale-making. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 309-326.
27. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29. Popkewitz, T. (2000). Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
30. Sahlström, F. (1999). Up the hill backwards: On interactional constraints and affordances for equity-constitution in the classrooms of the Swedish comprehensive school. Uppsala universitet, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsomrâdet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Pedagogiska institutionen, Uppsala.
31. Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
32. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Buckingham Open University Press.
33. Wells, G. (1985). Language, Learning and Education. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
34. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
35. Odegaard, M., & Arnesen, N. E. (2010). Hva skjer i naturfagklasserommet? ~ resultater fra en videobasert klasseromsstudie; PISA+. NorDiNa, 6(1).