Dialogism in corporate social responsibility communications: Conceptualising verbal interaction between organisations and their audiences

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 665-679

  Brennan, Niamh M ^a   Merkl Davies, Doris M ^b   Beelitz, Annika ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CSR communication; Dialogism; Interaction; Intertextuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880957707     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1825-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organisation in crisis. Communication Monographs, 61, 44–62.
2. Ashforth, B., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edged sword of organisational legitimation. Organisation Science, 1(2), 177–194.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s’ poetics (R.W. Rotsel, Trans.). Ann Arbor: Ardis.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel, (M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices (pp. 83–96). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
6. Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 356–381.
7. Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘‘CEO-speak’’ after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120.
8. Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communications. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177–186.
9. Benoit, W. L., & Czerwinski, A. (1997). A critical analysis of USAir’s image repair discourse. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 38–57.
10. Brennan, N. M., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Rhetoric and argument in social and environmental reporting: The Dirty Laundry case. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 2296793.
11. Burchell, J., & Cook, J. (2006). Confronting the ‘‘corporate citizen’’: Shaping the discourse of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4), 121–137.
12. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 67–946.
13. Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1145–1176.
14. Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.
15. Coombs, T. W. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the ‘‘appropriate’’ crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447–476.
16. Cooper, A. D. (2009). Two-way communication: A win–win model for facing activist pressure: A case study on McDonalds and Unilever’s responses to Greenpeace. Ball State University Indiana: Master of Arts in Public Relations dissertation.
17. Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A., & Austin, J. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5), 475–496.
18. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.
19. De Tienne, K. B., & Lewis, L. W. (2005). The pragmatic and ethical barriers to corporate social responsibility disclosure: The Nike case. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 359–376.
20. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting an exploration of the interaction between WW-F Australia. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 31(4/5), 343–372.
21. Dionisopoulos, G. N., & Vibbert, S. L. (1988). CBS vs. Mobil Oil: Charges of creative bookkeeping in 1979. In H. R. Ryan (Ed.), Oratorical encounters: Selected studies and sources of twentieth-century political accusation and apologies (pp. 241–252). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
22. Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbour. Business & Society, 40(4), 442–471.
23. Dunfee, T. W. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Managing corporate social responsibility in a multiple actor context. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 346–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Elsbach, K. D. (2001). The architecture of legitimacy: Constructing accounts of organisational controversies. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The Psychology of Legitimacy (pp. 391–415). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Fairclough, N. L. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Longman.
26. Fassin, Y. (2009). Inconsistencies in activists’ behaviours and the ethics of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 503–521.
27. Foster, D., & Jonker, J. (2005). Stakeholder relationships the dialogue of engagement. Corporate Governance, 5(5), 51–57.
28. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.
29. Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (2004). Organisational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organisational audience. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organisational Identity (pp. 223–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organisational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.
31. Gray, R. H., Owen, D. L., & Maunders, K. T. (1987). Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting & Accountability. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.
32. Hearit, K. M. (1994). Apologies and public relations crises at Chrysler, Toshiba, and Volvo. Public Relations Review, 20(2), 113–125.
33. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management—New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 55–68.
34. Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2008). An analysis of corporate social responsibility at Credit Line: A narrative approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 403–418.
35. Jacobs, G. (1999). Self-reference in press releases. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(2), 219–242.
36. Johansen, T. S., & Neilsen, A. E. (2011). Strategic stakeholder dialogues: A discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(3), 204–217.
37. Joutsenvirta, M. (2011). Setting boundaries for corporate social responsibility: Firm-NGO relationship as a discursive legitimation struggle. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 57–75.
38. Kuhn, T., & Deetz, S. (2008). Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning? In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 173–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Lee, M., & Kohler, J. (2010). Benchmarking and transparency: Incentives for the pharmaceutical industry’s corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 641–658.
40. Lindblom, C. K. (2010). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. In R. Gray, J. Bebbington, & S. Gray (Eds.), Social and environmental accounting (pp. 51–64). London: Sage.
41. Lotila, P. (2010). Corporate responsiveness to social pressure: An interaction-based model. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 395–409.
42. Melé, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 47–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Milliken, F. J., & Wolfe Morrison, E. (2003). Shades of silence: Emerging themes and future directions for research on silence in organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1563–1568.
44. Millington, A. (2008). Responsibility in the supply chain. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 363–383). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–758.
46. Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9–29.
47. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). A Mathematical Model of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
48. Slembrouck, S. (2011). Intertextuality. In J. Zienkowski, J. O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive Pragmatics (pp. 156–175). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
49. Sleurs, K., & Jacobs, G. (2005). Beyond preformulation: An ethnographic perspective on press releases. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1251–1273.
50. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
51. Tsoukas, H. (1999). David and Goliath in the risk society. Organization, 6(3), 499–526.
52. Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Dialogue and cognition. In L. Vaina & J. Hintikka (Eds.), Cognitive Constraints on Communication (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
53. Van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159–177.
54. Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 273–283.
55. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.