Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: 'CEO-speak' After an incident in a German nuclear power plant

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 101-120

  Beelitz, Annika ^a   Merkl Davies, Doris M ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse; Impression management; Legitimacy; Nuclear industry; Stakeholder management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860889864     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1065-9     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abrahamsson, G., Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2011). Organisational identity and management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 24(3), 345-376.
2. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1-27.
3. Amernic, J. H., & Craig, R. J. (2006). CEO speak: The language of corporate leadership. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
4. Amernic, J. H., & Craig, R. J. (2007). Guidelines for CEO-speak: Editing the language of corporate leadership. Strategy and Leadership, 35(3), 25-31.
5. Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2000). Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospital's use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 494-522.
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194.
7. Bartsch, M., Dohmen F., Kaiser, S., Knauer, S., Ludwig, U., Meyer, C., & Nelles, R. (2007). German mishaps put nuclear power under scrutiny, Spiegel Online. http://www. spiegel. de/international/germany/0, 1518, 494707, 00. html.
8. Berliner Zeitung. (2007, June 30). Brandheiße Alternativen, http://www. berlinonline. de/berliner-zeitung/spezial/dossiers/klimawandel/81066/index. php.
9. Borglin, O., Lindell, G., & Lindström, S. (2008). Isomorphic learning at a disciplined nuclear power plant (School of Business Economics and Law, Göteborg University). Bachelor Thesis, http://gupea. ub. gu. se/bitstream/2077/17870/1/gupea_2077_17870_1. pdf.
10. Brennan, N. M., & Conroy, J. P. (2010). Executive hubris: The case of a bank CEO, Working Paper.
11. Breton, G., & Coté, L. (2006). Profit and the legitimacy of the Canadian banking industry. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(2), 512-539.
12. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. (2006). Große Mehrheit der Bevölkerung für Beibehaltung des Atomausstiegs. http://www. bmu. de/atomenergie_sicherheit/downloads/doc/37879. php.
13. Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total SA's Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 33-62.
14. Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2004a). The deployment of accounting-related rhetoric in the prelude to privatization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(1), 41-58.
15. Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2004b). Enron discourse: the rhetoric of a resilient capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(6/7), 813-851.
16. Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). The mobilization of accounting in preening for privatization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(1), 82-95.
17. Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2008). A privatization success story: Accounting and narrative expression over time. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(8), 1085-1115.
18. Crowther, D., Carter, C., & Cooper, S. (2006). The poetics of corporate reporting: Evidence from the UK water industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(1/2), 175-201.
19. Der Spiegel. (2007, July 11). Merkel furious about nuclear mishaps, http://www. spiegel. de/international/germany/0, 1518, 493775, 00. html.
20. Der Spiegel. (2007, July 16). Energy giant fires nuclear boss, http://www. spiegel. de/international/germany/0, 1518, 494734, 00. html.
21. Der Spiegel. (2007, July 18). The Fallout continues: Vattenfall Europe Boss Rauscher Resigns, http://www. spiegel. de/international/business/0, 1518, 495264, 00. html.
22. Deutsche Welle. http://www. dw-world. de/dw/article/0, 2144, 2306337, 00. html.
23. Die Welt. (2007, July 2). Streit über Wiederanfahren von Brunsbüttel, http://www. welt. de/welt_print/article990186/Streit_ueber_Wiederanfahren_von_Brunsbuettel. html.
24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
25. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122-136.
26. Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the Californian cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57-88.
27. Elsbach, K. D. (2001). The Architecture of legitimacy: Constructing accounts of organisational controversies. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 391-415). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
29. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Text analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
30. Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
31. General-Anzeiger. (2007, June 30). Debatte über Sicherheit; ENERGIE: Pannen in Kernkraftwerken geben Rätsel auf.
32. Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (2004). Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organisational audience. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational identity (pp. 223-261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
34. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
36. Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organisation theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management-New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1-2), 55-68.
38. Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-245.
39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Lightstone, K., & Driscoll, C. (2008). Disclosing elements of disclosure: A test of legitimacy theory and company ethics. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(1), 7-21.
41. Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. New York: Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference.
42. Linsley, P., & Kajüter, P. (2008). Restoring and repairing legitimacy: A case study of impression management in response to a major risk event at Allied Irish Banks plc. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 3(1), 65-82.
43. Livesey, S. M. (2002a). Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytical approaches to exxon mobile's corporate public disclosure. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117-146.
44. Livesey, S. M. (2002b). Transparent and caring corporations? A study of sustainability reporting by the body shop and royal Dutch/shell. Organization and Environment, 15(3), 233-258.
45. Llewellyn, S. (1999). Narratives in accounting and management research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 220-236.
46. Mäkelä H., & Laine, M. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, forthcoming.
47. McKenna, D. J., & Graham, P. (2000). Technocratic discourse: A primer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(3), 219-247.
48. Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: New insights from psychology, sociology, and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, forthcoming.
49. Merkl-Davies D. M., & Koller, V. (2011). Metaphoring people out of this world: A critical discourse analysis of a chairman's statement of a UK defence firm. Accounting Forum, forthcoming.
50. Milne, M., Tregidga, H., & Walton, S. (2009). Words not action! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1211-1257.
51. Ogden, S., & Clarke, J. (2005). Customer disclosure, impression management and the construction of legitimacy: Corporate reports in the UK privatised water industry. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(3), 313-345.
52. O'Higgins, E. R. E. (2010). Corporations, civil society, and stakeholders: An organisational conceptualization. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 157-176.
53. O'Keefe, P., & Conway, S. (2008). Impression management and legitimacy in a NGO environment. University of Tasmania, School of Accounting Working Paper Series 02/2008.
54. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88.
55. Roose, J. (2010). Der endlose Streit um die Atomenergie. Konfliktsoziologische Untersuchung einer dauerhaften Auseinandersetzung. In P. H. Feindt & T. Saretzki (Eds.), Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte. Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag.
56. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
57. Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalisation of Corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9-29.
58. Schwarzbuch Vattenfall. http://www. klimaunterschrift-vattenfall. de/files/Vattenfall_Schwarzbuch_1228148011. pdf.
59. Stoett, P. (2003). Toward renewed legitimacy? Nuclear power, global warming, and security. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 99-116.
60. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Research, 20(3), 571-610.
61. Tagesspiegel. (2007, December 10). Vattenfall verliert 250. 000 Kunden, http://www. tagesspiegel. de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/vattenfall-verliert-250-000-kunden/1118412. html.
62. TAZ. (2007, July 4). Vattenfall vertuscht Atomunfall, http://www. taz. de/?id=475andart=1498andno_cache=1.
63. Tomer, J. (2008). Beyond the rationality of economic man: toward the true rationality of human man. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1703-1712.
64. Tregidga H., Milne, M., & Kearins, K. (2007). Organisational legitimacy in bridging the text and context of social and environmental reporting, Working paper. http://www. acis. canterbury. ac. nz/documents/Markus_Milne_Research_Programmes/Organisational_Legitimacy_and_SER. pdf.
65. van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
66. Vattenfall. (2007, June 28). Kernkraftwerke Brunsbüttel und Krümmel vom Netz, http://www. vattenfall. de/www/vf/vf_de/225583xberx/232127press/232157press/232187archi/258228press/index. jsp?pmid=112839.
67. Vattenfall. (2007, July 1). Kernkraftwek Brunsbüttel wieder am Netz, http://www. vattenfall. de/www/vf/vf_de/225583xberx/232127press/232157press/232187archi/258228press/index. jsp?pmid=112894.
68. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society, 3 volumes. Towata: Bedminster Press.
69. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & R. M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.