Differential regulation of stiffness, topography, and dimension of substrates in rat mesenchymal stem cells

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 31, 2013, Pages 7616-7625

  Li, Zhan ^a   Gong, Yuanwei ^a   Sun, Shujin ^a   Du, Yu ^a   Lü, Dongyuan ^a   Liu, Xiaofeng ^a   Long, Mian ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MECHANICS   (China)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Dimension; Proliferation; Stem cell; Stiffness; Topography

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICAL PARAMETERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DIFFERENTIAL REGULATION; DIMENSION; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION; POLYACRYLAMIDE HYDROGELS; PROLIFERATION;

CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); ELASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEINS; RATS; STEM CELLS; STIFFNESS; SUBSTRATES;

TOPOGRAPHY;

POLYACRYLAMIDE; VIMENTIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL ISOLATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HYDROGEL; MALE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; RIGIDITY; TOPOGRAPHY;

RATTUS;

EID: 84880927702     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.059     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Schofield R. Relationship between spleen solony-forming cell and hematopoietic stem-cell-hypothesis. Blood Cells 1978, 4:7-25.
2. McAdams T.A., Miller W.M., Papoutsakis E.T. Lineage distribution of exvivo hematopoietic cultures is substantially influenced by small changes in culture pH. Blood 1996, 88:2416.
3. Guthridge M.A., Barry E.F., Felquer F.A., McClure B.J., Stomski F.C., Ramshaw H., et al. The phosphoserine-585-dependent pathway of the GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 receptors mediates hematopoietic cell survival through activation of NF-kappa B and induction of bcl-2. Blood 2004, 103:820-827.
4. Wei Q., Clarke L., Qian B., Zhang C., Shannon P., Gutmann D., et al. Astrocyte-specific PTEN deletion results in developmental abnormalities of the central nervous system. Neuro-Oncology 2004, 6:349.
5. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
6. Witkowska-Zimny M., Walenko K., Walkiewicz A.E., Pojda Z., Przybylski J., Lewandowska-Szumiel M. Effect of substrate stiffness on differentiation of umbilical cord stem cells. Acta Biochim Pol 2012, 59:261-264.
7. Her G.J., Wu H.C., Chen M.H., Chen M.Y., Chang S.C., Wang T.W. Control of three-dimensional substrate stiffness to manipulate mesenchymal stem cell fate toward neuronal or glial lineages. Acta Biomater 2013, 9:5170-5180.
8. Katoh M. WNT signaling in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Curr Drug Targets 2008, 9:565-570.
9. Ling L., Nurcombe V., Cool S.M. Wnt signaling controls the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene 2009, 433:1-7.
10. Takada I., Kouzmenko A.P., Kato S. Wnt and PPAR gamma signaling in osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2009, 5:442-447.
11. Galli C., Passeri G., Ravanetti F., Elezi E., Pedrazzoni M., Macaluso G.M. Rough surface topography enhances the activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal cells. JBiomed Mater Res Part A 2010, 95A:682-690.
12. Luther G., Wagner E.R., Zhu G.H., Kang Q., Luo Q., Lamplot J., et al. BMP-9 induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: molecular mechanism and therapeutic potential. Curr Gene Ther 2011, 11:229-240.
13. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol-Cell Ph 2008, 295:C1037-C1044.
14. Seo C.H., Furukawa K., Montagne K., Jeong H., Ushida T. The effect of substrate microtopography on focal adhesion maturation and actin organization via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomaterials 2011, 32:9568-9575.
15. Trappmann B., Gautrot J.E., Connelly J.T., Strange D.G.T., Li Y., Oyen M.L., et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2012, 11:642-649.
16. Shih Y.R.V., Tseng K.F., Lai H.Y., Lin C.H., Lee O.K. Matrix stiffness regulation of integrin-mediated mechanotransduction during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. JBone Miner Res 2011, 26:730-738.
17. Zou C., Luo Q., Qin J., Shi Y., Yang L., Ju B., et al. Osteopontin promotes mesenchymal stem cell migration and lessens cell stiffness via integrin beta1, FAK, and ERK pathways. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013, 65:455-462.
18. Brydone A.S., Dalby M.J., Berry C.C., Meek R.M.D., McNamara L.E. Grooved surface topography alters matrix-metalloproteinase production by human fibroblasts. Biomed Mater 2011, 6:1-9.
19. Pek Y.S., Wan A.C., Ying J.Y. The effect of matrix stiffness on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in a 3D thixotropic gel. Biomaterials 2010, 31:385-391.
20. Burke D.P., Kelly D.J. Substrate stiffness and oxygen as regulators of stem cell differentiation during skeletal tissue regeneration: a mechanobiological model. PLoS One 2012, 7:1-12.
21. Tse J.R., Engler A.J. Stiffness gradients mimicking invivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PLoS One 2011, 6:1-9.
22. Wang Y., Wang G.X., Luo X.D., Qiu J.H., Tang C.J. Substrate stiffness regulates the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of epidermal cells. Burns 2012, 38:414-420.
23. Witkowska-Zimny M., Walenko K., Wrobel E., Mrowka P., Mikulska A., Przybylski J. Effect of substrate stiffness on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells and bone-derived cells. Cell Biol Int 2013, 10.1002/cbin.10078.
24. Watari S., Hayashi K., Wood J.A., Russell P., Nealey P.F., Murphy C.J., et al. Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. Biomaterials 2012, 33:128-136.
25. Gobaa S., Hoehnel S., Roccio M., Negro A., Kobel S., Lutolf M.P. Artificial niche microarrays for probing single stem cell fate in high throughput. Nat Methods 2011, 8:949-955.
26. Poellmann M.J., Harrell P.A., King W.P., Johnson A.J.W. Geometric microenvironment directs cell morphology on topographically patterned hydrogel substrates. Acta Biomaterialia 2010, 6:3514-3523.
27. Seo C.H., Furukawa K., Suzuki Y., Kasagi N., Ichiki T., Ushida T. Atopographically optimized substrate with well-ordered lattice micropatterns for enhancing the osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:938-945.
28. Aydin D., Louban I., Perschmann N., Blummel J., Lohmuller T., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., et al. Polymeric substrates with tunable elasticity and nanoscopically controlled biomolecule presentation. Langmuir 2010, 26:15472-15480.
29. Teo B.K.K., Goh S.H., Kustandi T.S., Loh W.W., Low H.Y., Yim E.K.F. The effect of micro and nanotopography on endocytosis in drug and gene delivery systems. Biomaterials 2011, 32:9866-9875.
30. Unadkat H.V., Hulsman M., Cornelissen K., Papenburg B.J., Truckenmuller R.K., Post G.F., et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:16565-16570.
31. 2 nanotubes. Small 2012, 8:98-107.
32. Wang H.J., Cao Y., Sun Y.Y., Wang K., Cao C., Yang L., et al. Is there an optimal topographical surface in nanoscale affecting protein adsorption and cell behaviors?. JNanopart Res 2011, 13:4201-4210.
33. Lee M.H., Oh N., Lee S.W., Kang J.H., Lee S.C., Leesungbok R. Enhancement of dynamic wettability, cell adhesion, and alkaline phosphatase activity of primary cells on titanium substrata with combined surface topographies of microgrooves and acid-etched roughness. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2010, 7:501-512.
34. Cheng X., Guo L.J. One-step lithography for various size patterns with a hybrid mask-mold. Microelectron Eng 2004, 71:288-293.
35. Engler A.J. Mechanical derivation of functional myotubes from adipose-derived stem cells. JTissue Eng Regen M 2012, 6:2482-2491.
36. Dado D., Sagi M., Levenberg S., Zemel A. Mechanical control of stem cell differentiation. Regen Med 2012, 7:101-116.
37. Cohen D.M., Chen C.S. Mechanical control of stem cell differentiation. StemBook. The stem cell research community 2008, 1-16. StemBook, Boston. S. Bhatia, J. Polak (Eds.).
38. Kilian K.A., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4872-4877.
39. Evans N.D., Minelli C., Gentleman E., LaPointe V., Patankar S.N., Kallivretaki M., et al. Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur Cells Mater 2009, 18:1-14.
40. Wang L.S., Boulaire J., Chan P.P.Y., Chung J.E., Kurisawa M. The role of stiffness of gelatin-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid hydrogels formed by enzyme-mediated crosslinking on the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8608-8616.
41. Leipzig N.D., Shoichet M.S. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 2009, 30:6867-6878.
42. Wood J.A., Ly I., Borjesson D.L., Nealey P.F., Russell P., Murphy C.J. The modulation of canine mesenchymal stem cells by nano-topographic cues. Exp Cell Res 2012, 318:2438-2445.
43. Yang J.L., Liu A.M., Zhou C.R. Proliferation of mesenchymal stem cell on chitosan films associated with convex micro-topography. JBiomat Sci-Polym E 2011, 22:919-929.
44. Cai L., Zhang L., Dong J.Y., Wang S.F. Photocured biodegradable polymer substrates of varying stiffness and microgroove dimensions for promoting nerve cell guidance and differentiation. Langmuir 2012, 28:12557-12568.
45. Zhu H.B., Cao B.R., Zhen Z.P., Laxmi A.A., Li D., Liu S.R., et al. Controlled growth and differentiation of MSCs on grooved films assembled from monodisperse biological nanofibers with genetically tunable surface chemistries. Biomaterials 2011, 32:4744-4752.
46. Lee M.R., Kwon K.W., Jung H., Kim H.N., Suh K.Y., Kim K., et al. Direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into selective neurons on nanoscale ridge/groove pattern arrays. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4360-4366.
47. Sorensen A., Alekseeva T., Katechia K., Robertson M., Riehle M.O., Barnett S.C. Long-term neurite orientation on astrocyte monolayers aligned by microtopography. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5498-5508.
48. Le D.M., Kulangara K., Adler A.F., Leong K.W., Ashby V.S. Dynamic topographical control of mesenchymal stem cells by culture on responsive poly(epsilon-caprolactone) surfaces. Adv Mater 2011, 23:3278-3283.
49. Kim E.J., Boehm C.A., Mata A., Fleischman A.J., Muschler G.F., Roy S. Post microtextures accelerate cell proliferation and osteogenesis. Acta Biomaterialia 2010, 6:160-169.
50. Hoffman-Kim D., Mitchel J.A., Bellamkonda R.V. Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2010, 12:203-231.
51. D'Angelo F., Armentano I., Mattioli S., Crispoltoni L., Tiribuzi R., Cerulli G.G., et al. Micropatterned hydrogenated amorphous carbon guides mesenchymal stem cells towards neuronal differentiation. Eur Cells Mater 2010, 20:231-244.
52. Al-Haque S., Miklas J.W., Feric N., Chiu L.L.Y., Chen W.L.K., Simmons C.A., et al. Hydrogel substrate stiffness and topography interact to induce contact guidance in cardiac fibroblasts. Macromol Biosci 2012, 12:1342-1353.
53. Charest J.M., Califano J.P., Carey S.P., Reinhart-King C.A. Fabrication of substrates with defined mechanical properties and topographical features for the study of cell migration. Macromol Biosci 2012, 12:12-20.
54. Koo S., Ahn S.J., Zhang H., Wang J.C., Yim E.K.F. Human corneal keratocyte response to micro- and nano-gratings on chitosan and PDMS. Cell Mol Bioeng 2011, 4:399-410.
55. Kolind K., Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., Lovmand J., Pedersen F.S., Foss M., Besenbacher F. Acombinatorial screening of human fibroblast responses on micro-structured surfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31:9182-9191.
56. Schulte V.A., Diez M., Hu Y., Moeller M., Lensen M.C. Combined influence of substrate stiffness and surface topography on the antiadhesive properties of Acr-sP(EO-stat-PO) hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:3375-3383.
57. Badique F., Stamov D.R., Davidson P.M., Veuillet M., Reiter G., Freund J.N., et al. Directing nuclear deformation on micropillared surfaces by substrate geometry and cytoskeleton organization. Biomaterials 2013, 34:2991-3001.
58. Wang P.Y., Yu J.S., Lin J.H., Tsai W.B. Modulation of alignment, elongation and contraction of cardiomyocytes through a combination of nanotopography and rigidity of substrates. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7:3285-3293.
59. Sjostrom T., Lalev G., Mansell J.P., Su B. Initial attachment and spreading of MG63 cells on nanopatterned titanium surfaces via through-mask anodization. Appl Surf Sci 2011, 257:4552-4558.
60. Dickinson L.E., Rand D.R., Tsao J., Eberle W., Gerecht S. Endothelial cell responses to micropillar substrates of varying dimensions and stiffness. JBiomed Mater Res Part A 2012, 100A:1457-1466.
61. Recknor J.B., Sakaguchi D.S., Mallapragada S.K. Directed growth and selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells on micropatterned polymer substrates. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4098-4108.
62. Migliorini E., Grenci G., Ban J., Pozzato A., Tormen M., Lazzarino M., et al. Acceleration of neuronal precursors differentiation induced by substrate nanotopography. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2736-2746.