Geometric microenvironment directs cell morphology on topographically patterned hydrogel substrates

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 3514-3523

  Poellmann, Michael J ^a   Harrell, Patrick A ^b   King, William P ^b   Johnson, Amy J Wagoner ^b  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell morphology; Hydrogel; Micropatterned substrate; Topography

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELL ENGINEERING; HYDROGELS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); STEM CELLS; TOPOGRAPHY;

CELL BEHAVIOURS; CELL MORPHOLOGY; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; MICROENVIRONMENTS; MICROPATTERNED; MICROPATTERNED SUBSTRATES; PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS; POLYACRYLAMIDE HYDROGELS; SCAFFOLDS FOR TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SUBSTRATES;

COLLAGEN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; HYDROGEL;

ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; HYDROGEL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOPOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; PHARMACOLOGY; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SHAPE; HYDROGEL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RATS;

EID: 77956718260     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti J. Principles of tissue engineering, 3rd ed.. New York: Academic Press; 2007.
2. Yang S, Leong K, Du Z, Chua C. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 2001;7:679-89.
3. Wong JY, Leach JB, Brown XQ. Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell-biomaterial interface. Issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surf Sci 2004;570:119-33.
4. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005;310:1139-43.
5. Kulangara K, Leong KW. Substrate topography shapes cell function. Soft Matter 2009;5:4072-6.
6. Freed LE, Guilak F. Engineering functional tissues. In: Principles of tissue engineering. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2007. p. 137-53.
7. Kim D, Seo C, Han K, Kwon KW, Levchenko A, Suh K. Guided cell migration on microtextured substrates with variable local density and anisotropy. Adv Funct Mater 2009;19:1579-86.
8. Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein J. Engineering substrate topography at the micro-and nano-scale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009;48:5406-15.
9. Lovmand J, Justesen J, Foss M, Lauridsen RH, Lovmand M, Modin C, et al. The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. Biomaterials 2009;30:2015-22.
10. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng 1999;121:49-57.
11. Oakley C, Brunette D. The sequence of alignment of microtubules, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. J Cell Sci 1993;106:343-54.
12. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003;24:4337-51.
13. Beningo KA, Lo C, Wang Y. Flexible polyacrylamide substrata for the analysis of mechanical interactions at cell-substratum adhesions. Methods Cell Biol 2002;69:325-39.
14. Kandow CE, Georges PC, Janmey PA, Beningo KA. Polyacrylamide hydrogels for cell mechanics: steps toward optimization and alternative uses. In: Cell mechanics. New York: Academic Press; 2007. p. 29-46.
15. Damljanović V, Lagerholm BC, Jacobson K. Bulk and micropatterned conjugation of extracellular matrix proteins to characterized polyacrylamide substrates for cell mechanotransduction assays. BioTechniques 2005;39:847-51.
16. Revzin A, Russell RJ, Yadavalli VK, Koh W, Deister C, Hile DD, et al. Fabrication of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogel microstructures using photolithography. Langmuir 2001;17:5440-7.
17. Ward JH, Bashir R, Peppas NA. Micropatterning of biomedical polymer surfaces by novel UV polymerization techniques. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:351-60.
18. Yu T, Ober C. Methods for the topographical patterning and patterned surface modification of hydrogels based on hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:1126-31.
19. Suh KY, Langer R. Microstructures of poly (ethylene glycol) by molding and dewetting. Appl Phys Lett 2003;83:1668-70.
20. Suh K, Seong J, Khademhosseini A, Laibinis P, Langer R. A simple soft lithographic route to fabrication of poly (ethylene glycol) microstructures for protein and cell patterning. Biomaterials 2004;25:557-63.
21. Di Benedetto F, Biasco A, Pisignano D, Cingolani R. Patterning polyacrylamide hydrogels by soft lithography. Nanotechnology 2005;16: S165-70.
22. Morishima K, Tanaka Y, Ebara M, Shimizu T, Kikuchi A, Yamato M, et al. Demonstration of a bio-microactuator powered by cultured cardiomyocytes coupled to hydrogel micropillars. Sens Actuators B Chem 2006;119:345-50.
23. Pfister P, Wendlandt M, Neuenschwander P, Suter U. Surface-textured PEG-based hydrogels with adjustable elasticity: synthesis and characterization. Biomaterials 2007;28:567-75.
24. Lensen M, Schulte V, Salber J, Diez M, Menges F, Moller M. Cellular responses to novel, micropatterned biomaterials. Pure Appl Chem 2008;80:2479-87.
25. Schulte VA, Díez M, Möller M, Lensen MC. Surface topography induces fibroblast adhesion on intrinsically nonadhesive poly (ethylene glycol) substrates. Biomacromolecules 2009;10:2795-801.
26. Kim P, Kim DH, Kim B, Choi SK, Lee SH, Khademhosseini A, et al. Fabrication of nanostructures of polyethylene glycol for applications to protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Nanotechnology 2005;16:2420-6.
27. Suh KY, Choi S, Baek S, Kim T, Langer R. Observation of high-aspect-ratio nanostructures using capillary lithography. Adv Mater 2005;17:560-4.
28. Kim D, Kim P, Song I, Cha JM, Lee SH, Kim B, et al. Guided three-dimensional growth of functional cardiomyocytes on polyethylene glycol nanostructures. Langmuir 2006;22:5419-26.
29. Chandra D, Taylor JA, Yang S. Replica molding of high-aspect-ratio (sub-) micron hydrogel pillar arrays and their stability in air and solvents. Soft Matter 2008;4:979-84.
30. Fozdar D, Wu X, Patrick C, Chen S. Micro-well texture printed into PEG hydrogels using the FILM nanomanufacturing process affects the behavior of preadipocytes. Biomed Microdevices 2008;10:839-49.
31. Suh K, Park M, Kim P. Capillary force lithography: a versatile tool for structured biomaterials interface towards cell and tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2009;19:2699-712.
32. Timofeev E, Kochetkova S, Mirzabekov A, Florentiev V. Regioselective immobilization of short oligonucleotides to acrylic copolymer gels. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:3142-8.
33. Hermanson GT. Bioconjugate techniques. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2008.
34. Tsang V, Chen A, Cho L, Jadin K, Sah R, De Long S, et al. Fabrication of 3D hepatic tissues by additive photopatterning of cellular hydrogels. FASEB J 2007;21:790-801.
35. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004;86:617-28.
36. Diduch D, Coe M, Joyner C, Owen M, Balian G. Two cell lines from bone marrow that differ in terms of collagen synthesis, osteogenic characteristics, and matrix mineralization. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75:92-105.
37. Reinhart-King CA, Dembo M, Hammer DA. Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. Biophys J 2008;95:6044-51.
38. Hill T, Lewicki P. Electronic statistics textbook. StatSoft Inc. Available from: http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook; 2010.
39. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004;6:483-95.
40. Flemming R, Murphy C, Abrams G, Goodman S, Nealey P. Effects of synthetic micro-and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-88.
41. Stains JP, Civitelli R. Cell-to-cell interactions in bone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;328:721-7.
42. Davidson PM, Özçelik H, Hasirci V, Reiter G, Anselme K. Microstructured surfaces cause severe but non-detrimental deformation of the cell nucleus. Adv Mater 2009;21:3586-90.
43. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2005;60:24-34.
44. Engler A, Sen S, Sweeney H, Discher D. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
45. Winer JP, Janmey PA, McCormick ME, Funaki M. Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. Tissue Eng A 2009;15:147-54.
46. Boudou T, Ohayon J, Picart C, Tracqui P. An extended relationship for the characterization of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of tunable polyacrylamide gels. Biorheology 2006;43:721-8.
47. Boudou T, Ohayon J, Picart C, Tracqui P. An extended relationship for the characterization of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of tunable polyacrylamide gels. Biorheology 2007;44:139.