Speed of Human Biological Form and Motion Processing

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Buzzell, George ^a   Chubb, Laura ^a   Safford, Ashley S ^a   Thompson, James C ^a   McDonald, Craig G ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84880840813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069396     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Johansson G, (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14: 201-211. doi:10.3758/BF03212378.
2. Blake R, Shiffrar M, (2007) Perception of human motion. Annu Rev Psychol 58: 47-73. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190152. PubMed: 16903802.
3. Giese MA, Poggio T, (2003) Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 179-192. doi:10.1038/nrn1057. PubMed: 12612631.
4. Vaina LM, Lemay M, Bienfang DC, Choi AY, Nakayama K, (1990) Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Vis Neurosci 5: 353-369. doi:10.1017/S0952523800000444. PubMed: 2265150.
5. McLeod P, (1996) Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a'Motion-blind Patient. Visual Cognition 3: 363-392.
6. Lange J, Lappe M, (2006) A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. J Neurosci 26: 2894-2906. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4915-05.2006. PubMed: 16540566.
7. Hirai M, Fukushima H, Hiraki K, (2003) An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans. Neurosci Lett 344: 41-44. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00413-0. PubMed: 12781917.
8. Hirai M, Hiraki K, (2006) The relative importance of spatial versus temporal structure in the perception of biological motion: An event-related potential study. Cognition 99: B15-B29. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.003. PubMed: 16051211.
9. Baccus W, Mozgova O, Thompson JC, (2009) Early integration of form and motion in the neural response to biological motion. Neuroreport 20: 1334-1338. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328330a867. PubMed: 19687766.
10. Jokisch D, Daum I, Suchan B, Troje NF, (2005) Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis. Behav Brain Res 157: 195-204. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.025. PubMed: 15639170.
11. Krakowski AI, Ross LA, Snyder AC, Sehatpour P, Kelly SP, et al. (2011) The neurophysiology of human biological motion processing: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage 56: 373-383. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.058. PubMed: 21276862.
12. Pavlova M, Lutzenberger W, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N, (2004) Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. Cereb Cortex 14: 181-188. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg117. PubMed: 14704215.
13. Pavlova M, Birbaumer N, Sokolov A, (2006) Attentional modulation of cortical neuromagnetic gamma response to biological movement. Cereb Cortex 16: 321-327. PubMed: 15901655.
14. Thornton IM, Vuong QC, (2004) Incidental processing of biological motion. Curr Biol 14: 1084-1089. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.025. PubMed: 15203001.
15. Thompson J, Parasuraman R, (2012) Attention, biological motion, and action recognition. NeuroImage 59: 4-13. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.044. PubMed: 21640836.
16. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H, (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25: 355-373. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00019-7. PubMed: 11445140.
17. Safford AS, Hussey EA, Parasuraman R, Thompson JC, (2010) Object-based attentional modulation of biological motion processing: spatiotemporal dynamics using functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. J Neurosci 30: 9064-9073. PubMed: 20610740.
18. Delorme A, Makeig S, (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. PubMed: 15102499.
19. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA, (1991) Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 1057-1074. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.1057. PubMed: 1837297.
20. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L, (1998) Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 781-787. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.781. PubMed: 9448241.
21. Chong H, Riis JL, McGinnis SM, Williams DM, Holcomb PJ, et al. (2008) To ignore or explore: top-down modulation of novelty processing. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 120-134. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20003. PubMed: 17919081.
22. Hagen GF, Gatherwright JR, Lopez BA, Polich J, (2006) P3a from visual stimuli: Task difficulty effects. Int J Psychophysiol 59: 8-14. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.003. PubMed: 16253363.
23. Rosburg T, Ludowig E, Dümpelmann M, Alba-Ferrara L, Urbach H, et al. (2010) The effect of face inversion on intracranial and scalp recordings of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 47: 147-157. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00881.x. PubMed: 19761525.
24. Comerchero MD, Polich J, (1999) P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 110: 24-30. doi:10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00033-1. PubMed: 10348317.
25. Pazo-Alvarez P, Cadaveira F, Amenedo E, (2003) MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 63: 199-236. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00049-8. PubMed: 12853168.
26. Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Vogel EK, et al. (1998) Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353: 1257-1270. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0281. PubMed: 9770220.
27. Handy TC, Khoe W, (2005) Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process? J Cogn Neurosci 17: 1936-1949. doi:10.1162/089892905775008715. PubMed: 16356330.
28. Zhang W, Luck SJ, (2008) Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nat Neurosci 12: 24-25. PubMed: 19029890.
29. Fedota JR, McDonald CG, Roberts DM, Parasuraman R, (2012) Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes. Psychophysiology 49: 1384-1393. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01455.x. PubMed: 22906001.
30. Dering B, Martin CD, Moro S, Pegna AJ, Thierry G, (2011) Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset. Front Hum Neurosci 5: 93-. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173839/. Accessed: 16 December 2012. PubMed: 21954382.
31. Rousselet GA, Pernet CR, Caldara R, Schyns PG, (2011) Visual object categorization in the brain: what can we really learn from ERP peaks? Front Hum Neurosci 5: 156-. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228234/. Accessed: 16 December 2012. PubMed: 22144959.
32. Beintema JA, Lappe M, (2002) Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 5661-5663. doi:10.1073/pnas.082483699. PubMed: 11960019.