Incidental processing of biological motion

Current Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1084-1089

  Thornton, Ian M ^a   Vuong, Quoc C ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; WALKING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; WALKING;

EID: 2942702307     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14:1973;201-211
2. Johansson G. Visual motion perception. Sci. Am. 232:1975;76-88
3. Mather G., Radford K., West S. Low level visual processing of biological motion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 249:1992;149-155
4. Hoffman D.D., Flinchbaugh B.E. The interpretation of biological motion. Biol. Cybern. 42:1982;195-204
5. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4:2002;179-192
6. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Percept. Psychophys. 16:1974;143-149
7. Miller J. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional locus, visual transients, and perceptual load. A search for boundary conditions Percept. Psychophys. 49:1991;270-288
8. Paquet L. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flanker task. Evidence for early selection. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8:2001;301-306
9. Ahlström V., Blake R., Ahlström U. Perception of biological motion. Perception. 26:1997;1539-1548
10. Dittrich W.H. Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception. 22:1993;15-22
11. Kozlowski L.T., Cutting J.E. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Percept. Psychophys. 21:1977;575-580
12. Pavlova M., Sokolov A. Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Percept. Psychophys. 62:2000;889-899
13. Pollick F.E., Paterson H.M., Bruderlin A., Sanford A.J. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition. 82:2001;B51-B61
14. Omori E.W.S. Discrimination of Johansson's stimuli in pigeons. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 9:1996;92
15. Yamaguchi M.K., Fujita K. Perception of biological motion by newly hatched chicks and quail. Perception. 28:1999;23-24
16. Blake R. Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol. Sci. 4:1993;54-57
17. Oram M., Perrett D. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to "biological motion" stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6:1994;99-116
18. Bülthoff I., Bülthoff H.H., Sinha P. Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nat. Neurosci. 1:1998;254-257
19. Shiffrar M., Lichtey L., Heptulla Chatterjee S. The perception of biological motion across apertures. Percept. Psychophys. 59:1997;51-59
20. Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T., Thornton I.M. Attention-based visual routines. Sprites. Cognition. 80:2001;47-60
21. Battelli L., Cavanagh P., Thornton I.M. Perception of biological motion in parietal patients. Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;1808-1816
22. Thornton I.M., Rensink R.A., Shiffrar M. Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception. 31:2002;837-853
23. Thornton I.M., Vuong Q.C., Bülthoff H.H. A chimeric point-light walker. Perception. 32:2003;377-383
24. Bertenthal B.I., Pinto J. Global processing of biological motions. Psychol. Sci. 5:1994;221-225
25. Virsu V., Rovamo J. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res. 37:1979;475-494
26. Cutting J.E., Moore C., Morrison R. Masking the motions of human gait. Percept. Psychophys. 44:1988;339-347
27. Watt P.J., Nottingham S.F., Young S. Toad tadpole aggregation behaviour. Evidence for a predator avoidance function Anim. Behav. 54:1997;865-872
28. Viscido S.V., Wethey D.S. Quantitative analysis of fiddler crab flock movement. Evidence for a "selfish herd" behaviour Anim. Behav. 63:2002;735-741
29. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15:2003;991-1001
30. Grezes J., Costes N., Decety J. Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion. A PET investigation Cogn. Neuropsychol. 15:1998;553-582
31. Grossman E., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron. 35:2002;1157-1165
32. Hirai M., Fukushima H., Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 344:2003;41-44
33. Pavlova M., Lutzenberger W., Sokolov A., Birbaumer N. Dissociable cortical processing for recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement. Analysing gamma MEG activity Cereb. Cortex. 14:2004;181-188
34. Bruce C., Desimone R., Gross C.G. Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 46:1981;369-384
35. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 3:1996;131-141
36. Blake R., Turner L.M., Smoski M.J., Pozdol S.L., Stone W.L. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol. Sci. 14:2003;151-157
37. Schenk T., Zihl J. Visual motion perception after brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;1289-1310
38. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;11656-11661
39. Cutting J.E. A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 10:1978;91-94
40. Inman V.T., Ralston H., Todd F. Human Walking. 1981;Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD