Attention, biological motion, and action recognition

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 4-13

  Thompson, James ^a   Parasuraman, Raja ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RECOGNITION; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MOTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COMPREHENSION; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; MOTION; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; VISUAL INFORMATION; WORKPLACE;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MOTION PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 80054117311     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.044     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Allison T., Puce A., McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:267-278.
2. Baccus W., Mozgova O., Thompson J.C. Early integration of form and motion in the neural response to biological motion. Neuroreport 2009, 7:1334-1338.
3. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:991-1001.
4. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 2002, 28:149-159.
5. Bidet-Caulet A., Voisin J., Bertrand O., Fonlupt P. Listening to a walking human activates the temporal biological motion area. Neuroimage 2005, 28:132-139.
6. Blake R., Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:47-73.
7. Bonda E., Petrides M., Ostry D., Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:3737-3744.
8. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R.J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 13:400-404.
9. Casile A., Dayan E., Caggiano V., Hendler T., Flash T., Giese M.A. Neuronal encoding of human kinematic invariants during action observation. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1647-1655.
10. Chong T.T., Cunnington R., Williams M.A., Kanwisher N., Mattingley J.B. fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1576-1580.
11. Chong T.T., Williams M.A., Cunnington R., Mattingley J.B. Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation. Neuroimage 2008, 40:298-307.
12. Clark V.P., Parasuraman R., Keil K., Kulanski R., Fannon S., Maisog J.M., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Selective attention to face identity and color studied with fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1997, 5:293-297.
13. Human factors of remotely operated vehicles. Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering, vol. 7 2006, Elsevier, Oxford, England. N. Cooke, H.L. Pringle, H.K. Pedersen, O. Connor (Eds.).
14. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
15. Cohen C.J., Morelli F., Scott K.A. A surveillance system for the recognition of intent within individuals and crowds. Proc. IEEE Conf. Technol. Homeland Sec. 2008, 559-565.
16. de Lange F.P., Spronk M., Willems R.M., Toni I., Bekkering H. Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:454-457.
17. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1995, 18:193-222.
18. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
19. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Percept. Psychophys. 1974, 16:143-149.
20. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 4:179-192.
21. Gopher D., Weil M., Siegel D. Practice under changing priorities: an approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychol. 1989, 71:147-177.
22. Grossman E.D., Jardine N.L., Pyles J.A. fMR-adaptation reveals invariant coding of biological motion on the human STS. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:15.
23. Grossman E.D., Battelli L., Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion. Vision Res. 2005, 45:2847-2853.
24. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 2002, 2002(35):1167-1175.
25. Grossman E.D., Blake R., Kim C.Y. Learning to see biological motion: brain activity parallels behavior. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:1669-1679.
26. Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:1133-1137.
27. Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:1160-1168.
28. Hirai M., Hiraki K. The relative importance of spatial versus temporal structure in the perception of biological motion: an event-related potential study. Cognition 2006, 99:15-29.
29. Iacoboni M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e79.
30. Jastorff J., Begliomini C., Fabbri-Destro M., Rizzolatti G., Orban G.A. Coding observed motor acts: different organizational principles in the parietal and premotor cortex of humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:128-140.
31. Jastorff J., Orban G.A. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals separation and integration of shape and motion cues in biological motion processing. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7315-7329.
32. Jellema T., Perrett D.I. Neural representations of perceived bodily actions using a categorical frame of reference. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1535-1546.
33. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 1973, 14:201-211.
34. Johnson-Frey S.H., Maloof F.R., Newman-Norlund R., Farrer C., Inati S., Grafton S.T. Actions or hand-object interactions? Human inferior frontal cortex and action observation. Neuron 2003, 39:1053-1058.
35. Jokisch D., Daum I., Suchan B., Troje N.F. Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 157:195-204.
36. Kable J.W., Chatterjee A. Specificity of action representations in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1498-1517.
37. Kilner J.M., Neal A., Weiskopf N., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Evidence of mirror neurons in human inferior frontal gyrus. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10153-10159.
38. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 21:451-468.
39. Lavie N. Distracted or confused: Selective attention under load. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:75-82.
40. Lewis J.W., Talkington W.J., Puce A., Engel L.R., Frum C. Cortical networks representing object categories and high-level attributes of familiar real-world action sounds. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 8:2079-2101.
41. Majdandzic J., Bekkering H., van Schie H.T., Toni I. Movement-specific repetition suppression in ventral and dorsal premotor cortex during action observation. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2736-2745.
42. Mather G., Radford K., West S. Low level visual processing of biological motion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., Biol. Sci. 1992, 249:149-155.
43. Mitchell J.P. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:262-271.
44. Nakayama K., Joseph J.S. Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search. The Attentive Brain 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge. R. Parasuraman (Ed.).
45. Nath A.R., Beauchamp M.S. Dynamic changes in superior temporal sulcus connectivity during perception of noisy audiovisual speech. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1704-1714.
46. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
47. Oram M.W., Perrett D.I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 76:109-129.
48. Ortigue S., Thompson J.C., Parasuraman R., Grafton S.T. Spatio-temporal dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: a combined EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6962.
49. Parasuraman R., Rizzo M. Neuroergonomics: the Brain at Work 2007, Oxford University Press, New York.
50. Parasuraman R., De Visser E., Clarke E., McGarry W.R., Hussey E., Shaw T., Thompson J. Detecting threat-related intentional actions of others: effects of image quality, response mode, and target cueing on vigilance. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2009, 15:275-290.
51. Peelen M.V., Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. Patterns of fMRI activity dissociate overlapping functional brain areas that respond to biological motion. Neuron 2006, 49:815-822.
52. Pelphrey K.A., Morris J.P., McCarthy G. Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:1706-1716.
53. Peuskens H., Vanrie J., Verfaillie K., Orban G.A. Specificity of regions processing biological motion. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 21:2864-2875.
54. Puce A., Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B., Biol. Sci. 2003, 358:435-445.
55. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:264-274.
56. Robertson I.H., Manly T., Andrade J., Baddeley B.T., Yiend J. "Oops!" Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal adults. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:215-226.
57. Safford A.S., Hussey E.A., Parasuraman R., Thompson J.C. Object-based attentional modulation of biological motion processing: spatiotemporal dynamics using functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:9064-9073.
58. Saxe R., Wexler A. Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1391-1399.
59. Saygin A.P., Wilson S.M., Hagler D.J., Bates E., Sereno M.I. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:6181-6188.
60. Saygin A.P. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 2007, 130:2452-2461.
61. Shmuelof L., Zohary E. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 2005, 47:457-470.
62. Shuster L., Thompson J.C. Resource theory: here, there, and everywhere. Aphasiology 2004, 18:850-854.
63. Simion F., Regolin L., Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:809-813.
64. Thompson J.C., Clarke M., Stewart T., Puce A. Configural processing of biological motion in human superior temporal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:9059-9066.
65. Thornton I.M., Rensink R.A., Shiffrar M. Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception 2003, 31:837-853.
66. Thornton I.M., Vuong Q.C. Incidental processing of biological motion. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:1084-1089.
67. Tickner A.H., Poulton E.C., Copeman A.K., Simmonds D.C.V. Monitoring 16 television screens showing little movement. Ergonomics 1972, 15:279-291.
68. Vainaa L.M., Lemaya M., Bienfanga D.C., Choia A., Nakayama K. Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis. Neurosci. 1990, 5:353-359.
69. Vallortigara G., Regolin L., Marconato F. Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3(7):e208. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208.
70. Voss, M., et al., this issue. Effects of training strategies implemented in a complex videogame on functional connectivity of attentional networks. NeuroImage.
71. Warm J.S., Parasuraman R., Matthews G. Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum. Factors 2008, 50:433-441.
72. Wheaton K.J., Thompson J.C., Syngeniotis A., Abbott D.F., Puce A. Viewing the motion of human body parts activates different regions of premotor, temporal, and parietal cortex. Neuroimage 2004, 22:277-288.
73. Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. Representation of Action in Occipito-temporal Cortex. J Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:1765-1780.
74. Wyk B.C., Hudac C.M., Carter E.J., Sobel D.M., Pelphrey K.A. Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:771-777.