Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes

Psychophysiology

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1384-1393

  Fedota, John R ^a,b   Mcdonald, Craig G ^a,b   Roberts, Daniel M ^a,b   Parasuraman, Raja ^a,b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Center of Excellence in Neuroergonomics Technology and Cognition (CENTEC)   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; EEG ERP; Normal volunteers

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866415730     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01455.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beck, D. M., & Kastner, S. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain. Vision Research, 49, 1154-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.012
2. Boudreau, C. E., Williford, T. H., & Maunsell, J. H. (2006). Effects of task difficulty and target likelihood in area V4 of macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2377-2387. doi: 10.1152/jn.01072.2005
3. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30. doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00033-1
4. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.
5. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215. doi: 10.1038/nrn755
6. De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806. doi: 10.1126/science.1056496
7. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
8. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
9. Eason, R. G., Harter, M. R., & White, C. T. (1969). Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction time in man. Physiology & Behavior, 4, 283-289. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(69)90176-0
10. Fort, A., Besle, J., Giard, M.-H., & Pernier, J. (2005). Task-dependent activation latency in human visual extrastriate cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 379, 144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.076
11. Fu, S., Zinni, M., Squire, P. N., Kumar, R., Caggiano, D. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2008). When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: An event-related potential and dipole modeling study. Neuroimage, 39, 1345-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.068
12. Gomez, C. M., & Flores, A. (2011). A neurophysiological evaluation of a cognitive cycle in humans. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 452-461. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.005
13. Gomez-Gonzalez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7, 41-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01184836
14. Handy, T. C., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 175-186. doi: 10.3758/BF03212070
15. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1257-1270. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0281
16. Hopf, J.-M., Vogel, E., Woodman, G., Heinze, H.-J., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2088-2095.
17. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284-291. doi: 10.1038/72999
18. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-204. doi: 10.1038/35058500
19. Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 267-384. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x
20. Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315-341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315
21. Kehrer, S., Kraft, A., Irlbacher, K., Koch, S. P., Hagendorf, H., Kathmann, N., & Brandt, S. A. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention. Psychological Research, 73, 751-761. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0194-y
22. Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256
23. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577. doi: 10.1017/S0048577201990559
24. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
25. Luck, S. J. (1995). Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Recent evidence from human electrophysiology. Behavioural Brain Research, 71, 113-123. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00041-0
26. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 887-904. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.887
27. Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x
28. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulation of sensory-evoked brain potentials provide evidence for changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.1057
29. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
30. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
31. Parasuraman, R. (1980). Effects of information processing demands on slow negative shift latencies and N100 amplitude in selective and divided attention. Biological Psychology, 11, 217-233. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(80)90057-5
32. Parasuraman, R., & Beatty, J. (1980). Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. Science, 210, 80-83. doi: 10.1126/science.7414324
33. Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of attention: From modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3990-3998.
34. Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15, 141-152. doi: 10.1023/A:1022637732495
35. Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401-423). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36. Ress, D., Backus, B. T., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 940-945. doi: 10.1038/78856
37. Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G. (1983). Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology, 20, 168-179. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb03283.x
38. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G., & Macht, M. (1982). Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science, 218, 909-911. doi: 10.1126/science.7134983
39. Senkowski, D., & Hermann, C. S. (2002). Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1742-1753. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00266-3
40. Serences, J. T., Yantis, S., Culberson, A., & Awh, E. (2004). Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 3538-3545. doi: 10.1152/jn.00435.2004
41. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03211619
42. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 799-806. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799
43. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
44. Williford, T., & Maunsell, J. H. (2006). Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 40-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.01207.2005