Increased CDK1 activity determines the timing of kinetochore-microtubule attachments in meiosis I

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 202, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 221-229

  Davydenko, Olga ^a   Schultz, Richard M ^a   Lampson, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1;

ANAPHASE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FEMALE; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; REGULATORY MECHANISM;

ANAPHASE; ANIMALS; CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; ENZYME ACTIVATION; FEMALE; KINETOCHORES; MEIOSIS; METAPHASE; MICE; MICROTUBULES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; OOCYTES; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84880783368     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201303019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aizawa, H., M. Kamijo, Y. Ohba, A. Mori, K. Okuhara, H. Kawasaki, H. Murofushi, K. Suzuki, and H. Yasuda. 1991. Microtubule destabilization by cdc2/H1 histone kinase: phosphorylation of a "pro-rich region" in the microtubule-binding domain of MAP-4. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 179:1620-1626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(91)91760-A
2. Bornslaeger, E.A., P. Mattei, and R.M. Schultz. 1986. Involvement of cAMPdependent protein kinase and protein phosphorylation in regulation of mouse oocyte maturation. Dev. Biol. 114:453-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(86)90209-5
3. Breuer, M., A. Kolano, M. Kwon, C.-C. Li, T.-F. Tsai, D. Pellman, S. Brunet, and M.-H. Verlhac. 2010. HURP permits MTOC sorting for robust meiotic spindle bipolarity, similar to extra centrosome clustering in cancer cells. J. Cell Biol. 191:1251-1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201005065
4. Brunet, S., A.S. Maria, P. Guillaud, D. Dujardin, J.Z. Kubiak, and B. Maro. 1999. Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase. J. Cell Biol. 146:1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.1.1
5. Brunet, S., J. Dumont, K.W. Lee, K. Kinoshita, P. Hikal, O.J. Gruss, B. Maro, and M.-H. Verlhac. 2008. Meiotic regulation of TPX2 protein levels governs cell cycle progression in mouse oocytes. PLoS ONE. 3:e3338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003338
6. Cai, S., C.B. O'Connell, A. Khodjakov, and C.E. Walczak. 2009. Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat. Cell Biol. 11:832-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1890
7. Chiang, T., F.E. Duncan, K. Schindler, R.M. Schultz, and M.A. Lampson. 2010. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of agerelated aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr. Biol. 20:1522-1528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.069
8. Chiang, T., R.M. Schultz, and M.A. Lampson. 2011. Age-dependent susceptibility of chromosome cohesion to premature separase activation in mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 85:1279-1283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.094094
9. Choi, T., F. Aoki, M. Mori, M. Yamashita, Y. Nagahama, and K. Kohmoto. 1991. Activation of p34cdc2 protein kinase activity in meiotic and mitotic cell cycles in mouse oocytes and embryos. Development. 113:789-795.
10. Ciosk, R., W. Zachariae, C. Michaelis, A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and K. Nasmyth. 1998. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell. 93:1067-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81211-8
11. Ganem, N.J., S.A. Godinho, and D. Pellman. 2009. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature. 460:278-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08136
12. Gavet, O., and J. Pines. 2010. Progressive activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. Dev. Cell. 18:533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.013
13. Gavin, A.C., J.C. Cavadore, and S. Schorderet-Slatkine. 1994. Histone H1 kinase activity, germinal vesicle breakdown and M phase entry in mouse oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 107:275-283.
14. Gui, L., and H. Homer. 2012. Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes. Development. 139: 1941-1946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.078352
15. Hached, K., S.Z. Xie, E. Buffin, D. Cladière, C. Rachez, M. Sacras, P.K. Sorger, and K. Wassmann. 2011. Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis I. Development. 138:2261-2271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.061317
16. Hampl, A., and J.J. Eppig. 1995. Translational regulation of the gradual increase in histone H1 kinase activity in maturing mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 40:9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080400103
17. Hassold, T., and P. Hunt. 2009. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 21:703-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e328332c6ab
18. Holt, J.E., S.I.R. Lane, P. Jennings, I. García-Higuera, S. Moreno, and K.T. Jones. 2012. APC(FZR1) prevents nondisjunction in mouse oocytes by controlling meiotic spindle assembly timing. Mol. Biol. Cell. 23:3970-3981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-05-0352
19. Homer, H.A., A. McDougall, M. Levasseur, A.P. Murdoch, and M. Herbert. 2005. Mad2 is required for inhibiting securin and cyclin B degradation following spindle depolymerisation in meiosis I mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 130:829-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00856
20. Huang, X., R. Hatcher, J.P. York, and P. Zhang. 2005. Securin and separase phosphorylation act redundantly to maintain sister chromatid cohesion in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:4725-4732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0190
21. Igarashi, H., J.G. Knott, R.M. Schultz, and C.J. Williams. 2007. Alterations of PLCbeta1 in mouse eggs change calcium oscillatory behavior following fertilization. Dev. Biol. 312:321-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.028
22. Jaspersen, S.L., and M. Winey. 2004. The budding yeast spindle pole body: structure, duplication, and function. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.022003.114106
23. Kapoor, T.M., M.A. Lampson, P. Hergert, L. Cameron, D. Cimini, E.D. Salmon, B.F. McEwen, and A. Khodjakov. 2006. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science. 311:388-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1122142
24. Kitajima, T.S., M. Ohsugi, and J. Ellenberg. 2011. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell. 146:568-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.031
25. Koffa, M.D., C.M. Casanova, R. Santarella, T. Köcher, M. Wilm, and I.W. Mattaj. 2006. HURP is part of a Ran-dependent complex involved in spindle formation. Curr. Biol. 16:743-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.056
26. Kolano, A., S. Brunet, A.D. Silk, D.W. Cleveland, and M.H. Verlhac. 2012. Error-prone mammalian female meiosis from silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint without normal interkinetochore tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:E1858-E1867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204686109
27. Kops, G.J.P.L., Y. Kim, B.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 169:49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411118
28. Kruse, T., G. Zhang, M.S.Y. Larsen, T. Lischetti, W. Streicher, T. Kragh Nielsen, S.P. Bjørn, and J. Nilsson. 2013. Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression. J. Cell Sci. 126:1086-1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.122481
29. Lampson, M.A., and I.M. Cheeseman. 2011. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21:133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.007
30. Lane, S.I., Y. Yun, and K.T. Jones. 2012. Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension. Development. 139:1947-1955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.077040
31. Ledan, E., Z. Polanski, M.E. Terret, and B. Maro. 2001. Meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte requires an equilibrium between cyclin B synthesis and degradation. Dev. Biol. 232:400-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0188
32. Li, M., S. Li, J. Yuan, Z.-B. Wang, S.-C. Sun, H. Schatten, and Q.-Y. Sun. 2009. Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS ONE. 4:e7701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007701
33. Ma, N., J. Titus, A. Gable, J.L. Ross, and P. Wadsworth. 2011. TPX2 regulates the localization and activity of Eg5 in the mammalian mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 195:87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201106149
34. Magidson, V., C.B. O'Connell, J. Loncarek, R. Paul, A. Mogilner, and A. Khodjakov. 2011. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell. 146:555-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.012
35. Maia, A.R.R., Z. Garcia, L. Kabeche, M. Barisic, S. Maffini, S. Macedo-Ribeiro, I.M. Cheeseman, D.A. Compton, I. Kaverina, and H. Maiato. 2012. Cdk1 and Plk1 mediate a CLASP2 phospho-switch that stabilizes kinetochoremicrotubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 199:285-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201203091
36. McGuinness, B.E., M. Anger, A. Kouznetsova, A.M. Gil-Bernabé, W. Helmhart, N.R. Kudo, A. Wuensche, S. Taylor, C. Hoog, B. Novak, and K. Nasmyth. 2009. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 19:369-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.064
37. Morin, V., S. Prieto, S. Melines, S. Hem, M. Rossignol, T. Lorca, J. Espeut, N. Morin, and A. Abrieu. 2012. CDK-dependent potentiation of MPS1 kinase activity is essential to the mitotic checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:289-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.048
38. Niault, T., K. Hached, R. Sotillo, P.K. Sorger, B. Maro, R. Benezra, and K. Wassmann. 2007. Changing Mad2 levels affects chromosome segregation and spindle assembly checkpoint control in female mouse meiosis I. PLoS ONE. 2:e1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001165
39. Nicklas, R.B. 1997. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 275:632-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5300.632
40. Oliveira, R.A., and K. Nasmyth. 2010. Getting through anaphase: splitting the sisters and beyond. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:1639-1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0381639
41. Pan, H., P. Ma, W. Zhu, and R.M. Schultz. 2008. Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev. Biol. 316:397-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.048
42. Polanski, Z., E. Ledan, S. Brunet, S. Louvet, M.H. Verlhac, J.Z. Kubiak, and B. Maro. 1998. Cyclin synthesis controls the progression of meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. Development. 125:4989-4997.
43. Rieder, C.L. 1981. The structure of the cold-stable kinetochore fiber in metaphase PtK1 cells. Chromosoma. 84:145-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00293368
44. Schindler, K., and R.M. Schultz. 2009. CDC14B acts through FZR1 (CDH1) to prevent meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 80:795-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.074906
45. Schuh, M., and J. Ellenberg. 2007. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell. 130:484-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.025
46. Silkworth, W.T., I.K. Nardi, L.M. Scholl, and D. Cimini. 2009. Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 4:e6564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006564
47. Silljé, H.H.W., S. Nagel, R. Körner, and E.A. Nigg. 2006. HURP is a Ranimportin beta-regulated protein that stabilizes kinetochore microtubules in the vicinity of chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 16:731-742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.070
48. Stemmann, O., H. Zou, S.A. Gerber, S.P. Gygi, and M.W. Kirschner. 2001. Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell. 107:715-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00603-1
49. Thompson, S.L., and D.A. Compton. 2008. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180:665-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200712029
50. Tsukahara, T., Y. Tanno, and Y. Watanabe. 2010. Phosphorylation of the CPC by Cdk1 promotes chromosome bi-orientation. Nature. 467:719-723.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09390
51. Wassmann, K., T. Niault, and B. Maro. 2003. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr. Biol. 13:1596-1608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.052
52. Waters, J.C., R.H. Chen, A.W. Murray, and E.D. Salmon. 1998. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141:1181-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.5.1181
53. Wei, L., X.-W. Liang, Q.-H. Zhang, M. Li, J. Yuan, S. Li, S.-C. Sun, Y.-C. Ouyang, H. Schatten, and Q.-Y. Sun. 2010. BubR1 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating meiotic cell cycle progression of mouse oocyte. Cell Cycle. 9:1112-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.6.10957
54. Winston, N.J. 1997. Stability of cyclin B protein during meiotic maturation and the first mitotic cell division in mouse oocytes. Biol. Cell. 89:211-219.
55. Wong, J., and G. Fang. 2006. HURP controls spindle dynamics to promote proper interkinetochore tension and efficient kinetochore capture. J. Cell Biol. 173:879-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200511132
56. Wong, O.K., and G. Fang. 2007. Cdk1 phosphorylation of BubR1 controls spindle checkpoint arrest and Plk1-mediated formation of the 3F3/2 epitope. J. Cell Biol. 179:611-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200708044
57. Yang, X., H. Li, X.S. Liu, A. Deng, and X. Liu. 2009. Cdc2-mediated phosphorylation of CLIP-170 is essential for its inhibition of centrosome reduplication. J. Biol. Chem. 284:28775-28782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.017681