Smart city-regionalism across Seattle: Progressing transit nodes in labor space?

Geoforum

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 139-149

  Dierwechter, Yonn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

City regionalism; Labor geography; Neoliberalism; Progressive politics; Smart growth; Transit investments; Urban sustainability

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; METROPOLITAN AREA; REGIONALISM; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN GROWTH;

SEATTLE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84880770969     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Addison C., Zhang S., Coomes B. Smart growth and housing affordability: a review of regulatory mechanisms and planning practices. Journal of Planning Literature 2013, 10.1177/0885412212471563.
2. Anas A., Arnott R., Small K. Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature 1998, 36(3):1426-1464.
3. Atkinson, S., 2013, February 23. Senior Planner, City of Tacoma. (Personel Communication).
4. Atkinson, S., Jorgensen, J., 2013. From Progressive Planning to Progressive Urbanism. Conflux: An Occasional Papers Series.
5. Bakkente, B., 2012, April 23. Senior Planner, Puget Sound Regional Council (Interview).
6. Beauregard R. What theorists do. Urban Geography 2012, 33(4):474-487.
7. Bogart W. Don't Call it Sprawl: Metropolitan Structure in the 21st Century 2006, New York Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Brenner N. State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960-1990". Political Geography 1997, 16(4):273-306.
9. Bullard R. Growing Smarter: Achieving Livable Communities, Environmental Justice, and Regional Equity 2007, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Burchell R., Listokin D., Galley C. Smart growth: more than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Housing Policy Debate 2000, 11(4):821-879.
11. Campbell, H., Harrison, P., 2004. The Value of Geography: Planning, Geography and Social Transformation in South Africa and the United Kingdom Paper Presented at the IBG-RGS Annual Conference, Glasgow.
12. Carlson T., Dierwechter Y. Effects of urban growth boundaries on residential development in Pierce County, Washington. Professional Geographer 2007, 59(2):209-220.
13. Chifos C. The sustainable communities experiment in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2007, 26(4):435-449. 10.1177/0739456x06297860.
14. City of Seattle Market Analysis of the Southeast Corridor Transit Station Areas 1999, BAE Pittman & Hames, Strategic Planning Office.
15. Coffey W., Shearmur R. Agglomeration and dispersion of high-order service employment in the Montreal metropolitan region, 1981-96. Urban Geography 2002, 39(3):359-378.
16. Daniels T. Smart growth: a new American approach to regional planning. Planning Practice and Research 2001, 16(3-4):271-279.
17. de la Cruz E. Local political institutions and smart growth an empirical study of the politics of compact development. Urban Affairs Review 2009, 45(2):218-246.
18. DeGrove J. Planning Policy and Politics: Smart Growth and the States 2005, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
19. Dierwechter Y. Urban growth management and its discontents: promises, practices and geopolitics in US city-regions 2008, Palgrave, New York.
20. Dierwechter, Y. 2013. Smart growth and state territoriality. Urban Studies. Published online before print March 6, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098013478230.
21. Dierwechter Y., Coffey W. Assessing the effects of neighborhood councils on urban policy and development: The example of Tacoma, Washington. Social Science Journal 2010, 47(3):71-491.
22. Downs A. What does smart growth really mean?. Planning (APA) 2001, 67(4):20.
23. Downs A. Smart growth: why we discuss it more than we do it. Journal of the American Planning Association 2005, 71:367-378.
24. Edwards M.M., Haines A. Evaluating smart growth. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2007, 27(1):49-64.
25. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, DOT Secretary Ray LaHood and HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan Announce Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities, Partnership sets Forth 6 'livability principles' to Coordinate Policy. (retrieved 20.10.12). http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/F500561FBB8D5A08852575D700501350.
26. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. About Smart Growth. (retrieved 20.10.12). http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/about_sg.htm.
27. Evans, Peter (ed.), 2002. Livable Cities? Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Ewing R., King M. Turning highways into main streets: two innovations in planning methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association 2005, 71(3):269-282.
29. Fainstein N., Fainstein S. Neighborhood enfranchisement and urban redevelopment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1982, 2(1):11-19.
30. Gibbs D., Krueger R., Macleod G. Grappling with smart city politics in an era of market triumphalism. Urban Studies 2013, 10.1177/0042098013491165.
31. Goetz A. Suburban sprawl or urban centres: tensions and contradictions of smart growth approaches in Denver, Colorado. Urban Studies 2013, 1-18. (Online First).
32. Gordon P., Richardson H. The sprawl debate: let markets plan. Publius 2001, 31:131-149.
33. Green Leigh N., Hoelzel B. Smart growth's blindside: sustainable cities need productive urban industrial land. Journal of the American Planning Association 2012, 78(1):87-103.
34. Hackworth J. Emergent urban forms, or emergent post-modernisms? A comparison of large U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Geography 2005, 26(3):484-519.
35. Hall J., Jennings E. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Public Performance and Management Review 2011, 35(1):202-226.
36. Hamin E.M., Steere M.O., Sweetser W. Implementing growth management. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2006, 26(1):53-65.
37. Hanscom, G., 2012. President Obama and the Forgotten Urban Agenda Grist.org. (retrieved 20.10.12). http://grist.org/cities/president-obama-and-the-forgotten-urban-agenda/.
38. Hanson S. Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 2010, 17(1):5-23.
39. Hanson S., Pratt G. Gender, Work, and Space 1995, Routledge, London.
40. Herrschel T. Sustainability AND competitiveness: can smart growth square the circle. Urban Studies 2013, 1-17. (Online First).
41. Howard, C., 2013, February 7. Director of Integrated Planning, Puget Sound Regional Council (Personal Communciation).
42. Huxley M. Planning, space, and government. The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography 2008, SAGE, Los Angeles, London. K. Cox, M. Low, J. Robinson (Eds.).
43. International City/County Management Association, & Smart Growth Network This Is Smart Growth 2006, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
44. Jarrett, F., 2013. Transportation Funding in Support of Our Regional Economy. Paper Presented at 'Transportation for the Next Economy'. Tacoma, WA. Urban Forum, February 7.
45. Jonas A. Region and place: regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography 2011, 36(1):1-10.
46. Jonas A. City-regionalism as a contingent 'geopolitics of capitalism'. Geopolitics 2012, 1-15. (Online First).
47. Jonas A., McCarthy L. Urban management and regeneration in the United States: state intervention or redevelopment at all costs?. Local Government Studies 2009, 35(3):299-314.
48. Jonas A., Ward K. Introduction to a debate on city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2007, 31(1):169-178.
49. Jonas A., While A., Gibbs D. Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces: the new territorial politics of collective provision. Regional Studies 2010, 44(2):183-200.
50. Kahn M. Gentrification trends in new transit-oriented communities: evidence from 14 cities that expanded and built rail transit systems. Real Estate Economics 2007, 35(2):155-182.
51. Katz B. The federal role in reducing sprawl. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2000, 572(November):66-77.
52. Katz, A., 2010. The Reverse Commute. (retrieved 20.01.12). http://prospect.org/article/reverse-commute-0#.TxljdlTJPn8.mailto.
53. Keil R. 'Common-sense' neoliberalism: progressive-conservative urbanism on Toronto, Canada. Antipode 2002, 34(3):578-601.
54. Kirwan Institute The Geography of Opportunity: Mapping to Promote Equitable Community Development and Fair Housing in King County, WA 2010, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, Columbus, OH.
55. Knaap G., Talen E. New urbanism and smart growth: a few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review 2005, 28(2):107-118.
56. Kneebone E., Berube A. Confronting Suburban Poverty 2013, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
57. Kneebone E., Garr E. The Suburbanization of Poverty: Trends in Metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008 2010, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
58. Krueger R. Smart growth and its discontents: an examination of American and European approaches to local and regional sustainable development. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica 2010, 56(3):409-433.
59. Krueger R., Agyeman J. Sustainability schizophrenia or "actually existing sustainabilities?" Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US. Geoforum 2005, 36(4):410-417.
60. Krueger R., Gibbs D. Third wave sustainability? Sustainable development, smart growth and regional development in the US. Regional Studies 2008, 42(9):1263-1274.
61. Krueger R., Savage L. City-regions and social reproduction: a 'Place' for sustainable development?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2007, 31(1):215-223.
62. Landis D. Growth management revisited: efficacy, price effects, and displacement. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72(4):411-430.
63. Leslie T. Identification and differentiation of urban centers in Phoenix through a multi-criteria Kernel-density approach. International Regional Science Review 2010, 33(2):205-235.
64. Litman T. Evaluating Criticisms of Smart Growth 2009, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC.
65. Macdonald S., Keil R. The Ontario Greenbelt: shifting the scales of the sustainability fix?. The Professional Geographer 2012, 64(1):125-145.
66. MacLeod G., Goodwin M. Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale, and explanation. Political Geography 1999, 18:697-730.
67. Martin D., McCann E., Purcell M. Space, scale, governance, and representation: contemporary geographical perspectives on urban policy and politics. Journal of Urban Affairs 2003, 25(2):113-121.
68. McCann E. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2010, 101(1):107-130.
69. McGuirk P. The political construction of the city-region: notes from Sydney. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2010, 31:179-187.
70. Millera J., Hoelb L. The "smart growth'' debate: best practices for urban transportation planning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2002, 36(1):1-24.
71. Myers G. African Cities 2012, Zed Books, London.
72. Orren, K., Skowronek, S., 1996. Institutions and Intercurrence: Theory Building in the Fullness of Time Nomos 37, Political, Order, pp. 11-146.
73. O'Toole, R., 2000. Is Urban Planning 'Creeping Socialism'? The Independent Review.(retrieved 12.03.05). http://www.independent.org.
74. Parnell S., Robinson J. (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography 2012, 33(4):593-617.
75. Pastor M., Benner C., et al. This Could Be the Start of Something Big? 2009, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
76. Pendall R., Puentes R. Land-use regulations as territorial governance in U.S. metropolitan areas. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 2008, 46:181-206.
77. Pendall, R., Puentes, R., Martin, J., 2006. From Traditional to Reformed: A Review of the Land Use Regulations in the Nation's 50 largest Metropolitan Areas. Research Brief, August. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
78. Pierce County Pierce County Economic Stimulus Report 2008, Pierce County, Tacoma, WA.
79. Puget Sound Regional Council, 2009. VISION 2040. Seattle Puget Sound Regional Council.
80. Puget Sound Regional Council Sustainable Communities Initiative: Growth Management Policy Board 2010, Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle.
81. Puget Sound Regional Council, 2011a. Corridor Action Strategy: South. Seattle Puget Sound Regional Council.
82. Puget Sound Regional Council, 2011b. Growing Transit Communities: Project Overview and Update. Seattle Puget Sound Regional Council.
83. Puget Sound Regional Council Plan Review Report and Certification Recommendation for the City of Bonney Lake 2006 Comprehensive Plan, Including Related 2010 Amendments 2011, Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle.
84. PSRC, 2013. Community Equity Grants. http://www.psrc.org/growth/growing-transit-communities/regional-equity/equity-grants/.
85. Schneider K. Smart Growth in the States 2008, Land Policy Institute: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
86. Scott J.W. Smart growth as urban reform: a pragmatic 'recoding' of the new regionalism. Urban Studies 2007, 44(1):15-35.
87. Sellers J. State-society relations beyond the Weberian state. Handbook of Governance 2010, 124-141. Sage, London. M. Bevir (Ed.).
88. Skocpol T. Introduction. Bringing the state back in 1985, New York Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Evans, R. Rueschemeyer, T. Skocpol (Eds.).
89. Smart Growth America Recent Lessons from the Stimulus: Transportation Spending and Job Creation 2011, Smart Growth America, Washington, DC.
90. Song Y. Suburban sprawl and smart growth. Handbook on Urban Planning 2012, Oxford University Press, New York. R. Weber, R. Crane (Eds.).
91. Storrar, J., 2012, October 31. Senior Planner, Puget Sound Reiognal Council (Email Communication).
92. Swanstrom T., Banks B. Going Regional: Community-based Regionalism, Transportation, and Local Hiring Agreements 2007, vol. 17. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, CA.
93. Smart Growth: Form and Consequences 2002, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA. T. Szold, A. Carbonell (Eds.).
94. Talen E., Knaap G. Legalizing smart growth. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 22(4):345-359.
95. Tretter E. Contesting sustainability: contesting sustainability: 'SMART growth' and the redevelopment of Austin's Eastside. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2013, 37(1):297-310.
96. Trohimovich T. The Growth Management Act (GMA) After More than 10 Years: Another Look & a Response to Criticisms 2002, 1000 Friends of Washington, Seattle.
97. Weitz J., Moore T. Development inside urban growth boundaries: Oregon's empirical evidence of contiguous urban form. Journal of the American Planning Association 1998, 64(4):424-440.
98. While A., Jonas A., Gibbs D. Unblocking the city? Growth pressures, collective provision, and the search for new spaces of governance in Greater Cambridge, England. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36:279-304.
99. Williamson T. Justice, the public sector, and cities. Justice and the American Metropolis 2011, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. C. Hayward, T. Swanstrom (Eds.).
100. Wyley E. Positively radical. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2011, 35:889-912.