Growth management revisited: Efficacy, price effects, and displacement

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 411-430

  Landis, John D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PLANNING; POPULATION GROWTH; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847401788     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360608976763     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anthony, J. (2004). Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl? Urban Affairs Review, 39(3), 376-397.
2. Altshuler, A. A., & Gomez-Ibañez, J. A. (1993). Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Baldassare, M. (2001). PPIC statewide survey: Special survey on growth. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
4. Brueckner, J. K. (1995). Strategic control of growth in a system of cities. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 393-416.
5. Brueckner, J. K. (1998). Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 438-467.
6. California Department of Housing and Community Development. (2000). Raising the roof: California housing development projections and constraints: 1997-2020. Sacramento: Department of Housing and Community Development, State of California.
7. Chapman, J. I. (1998). Proposition 13: Some unintended consequences. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
8. Construction Industry Research Board. (2000). Tabulations of residential building permits by jurisdiction. Burbank, CA: Author.
9. Dawkins, C. J., & Nelson, A. C. (2003). State growth management programs and central city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 381-396.
10. Deakin, E. (1989). Growth control: A summary and review of the empirical literature. Urban Land, 48(7), 16-21.
11. Ding, C., Knaap, G. J., & Hopkins, L. (1999). Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 53-68.
12. Dowall, D. (1984). Suburban squeeze. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Downs, A. (1991). The advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing. Housing Policy Debate, 2(4), 1095-1137.
14. Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15. Downs, A. (2002). Have housing prices risen faster in Portland than elsewhere? Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 7-31.
16. Fischel, W. (1990). Do growth controls matter? A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulation. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
17. Fischel, W. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Fulton, W., Shigley, P., Harrison, A., & Sezzi, P. (2000). Trends in local land use ballot measures, 1986-2000. Ventura, CA: Solimar Research Group.
19. Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
20. Glickfeld, M., & Levine, N. (1992). Regional growth, local reaction: The enactment and effects of local growth control and management measures in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
21. Landis, J. (1992). Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 489-508.
22. Landis, J,, Olshansky R., Huang, W., & Pendall, R. (1995). Fixing CEQA: Options and opportunities for reforming the California Environmental Quality Act. Berkeley: California Policy Seminar.
23. Landis, J. D., Elmer, V., & Zook, M. (2002). New economy housing markets: Fast and furious, but how different? Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 233-274.
24. Levine, N. (1999). The effect of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047-2068.
25. Levinson, D. (1997). The limits to growth management: Development regulation in Montgomery County, Maryland. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 689-707.
26. Lewis, P. G., & Nieman, M. (2002). Cities under pressure: Local growth controls and residential development policy. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
27. Lillydahl, J. H., & Singell, L. D. (1987). The effects of growth management on the housing market: A review of the theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9(1), 63-77.
28. Mayer, C., & Somerville, C. T. (2000). Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 639-662.
29. National Association of Realtors. (2005). Metropolitan area existing-home prices and state existing-home sales. Retrieved September 2, 2006 from http://www.realtor.org/Research.nsf/Pages/MetroPrice
30. Navarro, P., & Carson, R. (1991). Growth controls: Policy analysis for the second generation. Policy Sciences, 24(2), 127-152.
31. Nelson, A. C. (2000, May). Effects of urban containment on housing prices and landowner behavior. Land Lines, 12(3), p. 3. Retrieved September 2, 2006 from http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/ pub-detail.asp?id=298
32. Nelson, A. C., Pendall, R., Dawkins, C., & Knaap, G. J. (2002). The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
33. Nelson, A. C., Sanchez, T. W., & Dawkins, C. J. (2004). The effect of urban containment and mandatory housing elements on racial segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990-2000. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(3), 339-350.
34. Olshansky, R. (1996). The California Environmental Quality Act and local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 313-330.
35. O'Sullivan, A., Sexton, T., & Sheffrin, S. (1994). Property taxes and tax revolts: The legacy of Proposition 13. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Pendall, R. (1995). Residential growth controls and racial and ethnic diversity: Making and breaking the chain of exclusion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
37. Pendall, R. (1999). Do land use controls cause sprawl? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(4), 555-571.
38. Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulations and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125-142.
39. Phillips, J., & Goodstein, E. (2000). Growth management and housing prices: The case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), 334-344.
40. Porter, D. (1986). Growth management. Keeping on target? Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: Urban Land Institute and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
41. Quigley, J. M., Raphael, S., & Rosenthal, L. (2004). Local land-use controls and demographic outcomes in a booming economy. Urban Studies, 41(2), 389-421.
42. Schwartz, S., Zorn, P., & Hansen, D. (1986). Research design issues and pitfalls in growth control studies. Land Economics, 62(3), 223-233.
43. Shen, Q. (1996). Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(1), 61-91.
44. Shen, Q., & Zhang, F. (in press). Land-use changes in a pro-smart growth state. Environment and Planning A.
45. Shires, M. (1999). Patterns of California government revenue since Proposition 13. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
46. Staley, S. R. (2001). Ballot-box zoning, Transactions costs, and urban growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 1-25.
47. Wachter, S. M., & Cho, M. (1991). Inter-jurisdictional price effects of land use controls. Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 40, 49-63.
48. Whoriskey, P. (2004, August 10). Planners' brains versus public's brawn. Washington Post, p. A01.