Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability

Gender, Place and Culture

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-23

  Hanson, Susan ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Frances Willard; Gender; Mobility; Sustainable mobility

Indexed keywords

FEMINISM; GENDER ISSUE; MOBILITY; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SUSTAINABILITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 76749099343     PISSN: 0966369X     EISSN: 13600524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09663690903498225     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Blumen, O., and A. Kellerman. 1990. Gender differences in commuting distance, residence, and employment location: Metropolitan Haifa, 1972-1983. The Professional Geographer 42: 54-71.
2. Bruntland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Crane, R. 2007. Is there a quiet revolution in women's travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 73, no. 3: 298-316.
4. Cresswell, T., and T.P. Uteng. 2008. Gendered mobilities: Toward an holistic understanding. In Gendered mobilities, ed. T. Cresswell and T.P. Uteng, 1-12. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
5. Cristaldi, F. 2005. Commuting and gender in Italy: A methodological issue. The Professional Geographer 57, no. 2: 268-84.
6. Deakin, E. 2002. Sustainable transportation: U.S. dilemmas and European experiences. Transportation Research Record 1792: 1-11.
7. Doyle, D., and B. Taylor. 2000. Variation in metropolitan travel behavior by sex and ethnicity. In Travel patterns of people of color: Final report, ed. C. prepared by Batelle, Ohio, 181-244. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
8. Elder, G. 2003. Hostels, Sexuality, and the Aparteid Legacy. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
9. Elias, W., G. Newmark, and Y. Shiftan. 2008. Gender and travel behavior in two Arab communities in Israel. Tranportation Research Record, no. 2067: 75-83.
10. Gilbert, M., M. Masuci, C. Homko, and A. Bove. 2008. Theorizing the digital divide: Information and communication technology use frameworks among poor women using a telemedicine system. Geoforum 39: 912-25.
11. Gilbert, M.R. 1998. 'Race,' Space, and power: The survival strategies of working poor women. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, no. 4: 595-621.
12. Goddard, T., S. Handy, and P. Mokhtarian. 2006. Voyage of the SS minivan: Women's travel behavior in traditional and suburban neighborhoods. Transport Research Record, no. 1956: 141-8.
13. Gossen, R., and C. Purvis. 2005. Activities, time, and travel: Changes in women's travel time expenditures, 1990-2000. In Research on women's issues in transportation, Vol. 2: Technical papers, Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 35, 21-9. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
14. Hanson, S. 1982. The determinants of daily travel-activity patterns: Relative location and socio-demographic factors. Urban Geography 3: 179-202.
15. Hanson, S. 2003. Geographical and feminist perspectives on entrepreneurship. Geographische Zeitschrift 91: 1-23.
16. Hanson, S., and P. Hanson. 1980. Gender and urban activity patterns in Uppsala, Sweden. Geographical Review 70: 291-9.
17. Hanson, S., and I. Johnston. 1985. Gender differences in worktrip length: Explanations and implications. Urban Geography 6: 193-219.
18. Hanson, S., and G. Pratt. 1991. Job search and the occupational segregation of women. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81: 229-53.
19. Hanson, S., and G. Pratt. 1995. Gender, work, and space. London: Routledge.
20. Hapke, H., and D. Ayyankeril. 2004. Gender, the work-life course, and livelihood strategies in a South Indian fish market. Gender, Place, and Culture 11, no. 2: 229-56.
21. Haraway, D. 1991. Situated knowledge, gender for a Marxist dictionary. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Chapter 7. New York: Routledge.
22. Hough, J., X. Cao, and S. Handy. 2008. Exploring travel behavior of elderly women in rural and small urban North Dakota. Transportation Research Record, no. 2082: 125-131.
23. Johnsson-Latham, G. 2007. A study on gender equality as a prerequisite for sustainable development: What we know about the extent to which women globally live in a more sustainable way than men, leave a smaller ecological footprint, and cause less climate change. Report to the Environment Advisory Council, Ministry of the Environment, Sweden.
24. Johnston-Anumonwo, I. 1997. Race, gender, and constrained work trips in Buffalo, NY, 1990. The Professional Geographer 49, no. 3: 306-17.
25. Kates, R.W., and W.C. Clark. 1999. Our common journey. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Kern, L. 2005. In place and at home in the city: Connecting privilege, safety, and belonging for women in Toronto. Gender, Place, and Culture 12, no. 3: 357-77.
27. Koskela, H. 1999. 'Gendered exclusions': Women's fear of violence and changing relations to space. Geografiska Annaler 81B: 111-24.
28. Kwan, M.-P. 1999. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer 51, no. 2: 210-27.
29. Kwan, M.-P. 2004. GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler 84B, no. 4: 267-80.
30. Law, R. 1999. Beyond 'women and transport': towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography 23, no. 4: 567-88.
31. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and C. Fink. 2009. Addressing women's fear of victimization in transportation environments: A survey of US transit agencies. Urban Affairs Review 44, no. 4: 554-87.
32. Lucas, K., G. Marsden, M. Brooks, and M. Kimble. 2007. Assessment of capabilities for examining long-term social sustainability of transport and land use strategies. Transportation Research Record, no. 2013: 30-7.
33. Mandel, J. 2004. Mobility matters: Women's livelihood strategies in Porto Novo, Benin. Gender, Place, and Culture 11, no. 2: 257-87.
34. Marion, B., and M. Horner. 2007. Comparison of socioeconomic and demographic profiles of extreme commuters in several U.S. metropolitan statistical areas. Transportation Research Record, no. 2013: 38-45.
35. Massey, D. 1993. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 60-9. New York: Routledge.
36. McDowell, L. 2004. Masculinity, identity, and labour market change. Geografiska Annaler 86: 45-56.
37. McGuckin, N., and Y. Nakamoto. 2005. Differences in trip chaining by men and women. In Research in women's issues in transportation, Volume 2: Technical papers, 49-56. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
38. McLafferty, S., and V. Preston. 1991. Gender, race, and commuting among service sector workers. The Professional Geographer 43: 1-14.
39. Murakami, E., and J. Young. 1997. Daily travel by persons with low income. Paper presented at NPTS Nationwide Personal Transportation Symposium, October 29-31, Bethesda Maryland.
40. Nightingale, A. 2006. The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 165-85.
41. O'Brien, M., D. Jones, and D. Sloan. 2000. Children's independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood 7, no. 3: 257-77.
42. Plaut, P. 2004. Non-commuters: The people who walk to work or work at home. Transportation 31: 229-55.
43. Polk, M. 2003. Are women potentially more accommodating than men to a sustainable transport system? Tranportation Research Part D 8: 75-95.
44. Polk, M. 2004. The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography 12: 185-95.
45. Pratt, G., and S. Hanson. 1994. Geography and the construction of difference. Gender, Place and Culture 1, no. 1: 5-29.
46. Presser, H., and J. Hermsen. 1996. Gender differences in the determinants of work-related overnight travel among employed Americans. Work and Occupations 23, no. 1: 87-115.
47. Pucher, J., and R. Buehler. 2008. Making cycling irresistable: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Transport Reviews 28, no. 4: 495-528.
48. Ragin, C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49. Raju, S. 2005. Gender and empowerment: Creating 'thus far and no further' supportive structures, A case from India. In A companion to feminist geography, ed. L. Nelson and J. Seager, 194-207. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
50. Root, A. 2000. Women, travel, and the idea of 'sustainable transport'. Transport Reviews 20, no. 3: 369-83.
51. Rosenbloom, S. 2006. Understanding women's and men's travel patterns: The research challenge. In Research on women's issues in transportation: Volume 1 Conference overview and plenary papers, Conference proceedings 35, 7-28. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
52. Saegert, S. 1980. Masculine cities and feminine suburbs: Polarized ideas, contradictory realities. Signs 5 (Supplement, Women and the American city): S96-S111.
53. Schwanen, T., M. Dijst, and F. Dieleman. 2002. A microlevel analysis of residential context and travel time. Environment and Planning A 34: 1487-507.
54. Schwanen, T., and M.-P. Kwan. 2008. The Internet, mobile phone, and space-time constraints. Geoforum 39: 1362-77.
55. Scott, J. 1986. Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review 91: 1053-75.
56. Serageldin, I. 1995. Sustainability and the wealth of nations: First steps in an ongoing journey. Washington, DC: World Bank.
57. Shearmur, R. 2006. Travel from home: An economic geography of commuting distances in Montreal. Urban Geography 27, no. 4: 330-59.
58. Silvey, R., and R. Elmhirst. 2003. Engendering social capital: Women workers and rural-urban networks in Indonesia's crisis. World Development 31, no. 5: 865-79.
59. Song Lee, B., and J. McDonald. 2003. Determinants of commuting time and distance for Seoul residents: The impact of family status on the commuting of women. Urban Studies 40, no. 7: 1283-302.
60. Sperling, D., and D. Gordon. 2009. Two billion cars: Driving toward sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Srinivasan, S. 2008. A spatial exploration of the accessibility of low-income women: Chengdu, China and Chennai, India. In Gendered mobilities, ed. T. Cresswell and T.P. Uteng, 143-58. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co.
62. Sundberg, J. 2004. Identities in the making: Conservation, gender, and race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place, and Culture 11, no. 1: 43-66.
63. Tanzarn, N. 2008. Gendered mobilities in developing countries: The case of (urban) Uganda. In Gendered mobilities, ed. T. Cresswell and T.P. Uteng, 159-71. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
64. Valentine, G. 1989. The geography of women's fear. Area 21, no. 4: 385-90.
65. Van Vliet, W. 1983. Children's travel behaviour. Ekistics 50: 61-5.
66. Vance, C., and R. Iovanna. 2007. Gender and the automobile: Analysis of nonwork service trips. Transportation Research Record, no. 2013: 54-61.
67. Vandermissen, M., M. Theriault, and P. Villeneuve. 2006. Work trip: Are there still gender differences? The case of the Quebec metropolitan area. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January 22-26, Washington, DC.
68. Vasconcellos, E. 1997. The demand for cars in developing countries. Transportation Research Part A 31: 245-58.
69. Wekerle, G. 2005. Gender planning in public transit. In Gender and planning: A reader, ed. S. Fainstein and L. Servonlods, 275-95. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
70. Whitelegg, J. 1993. Transport for a sustainable future: The case for Europe. London: Bellhaven Press.
71. Willard, F. 1895. A wheel within a wheel: How I learned to ride the bicycle, with some reflections by the way. Bedford, MA: Applewood Books (originally published by Fleming H. Revell Co).
72. Wright, M. 2005. Paradoxes, protests, and the Mujeres de Negro of Northern Mexico. Gender, Place, and Culture 12, no. 3: 277-92.
73. Young, I.M. 1990. Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
74. Zauke, G., and M. Spitzner. 1997. Freedom of movement for women: Feminist approaches to traffic reduction and a more ecological transport science. World Transport Policy and Practice 3, no. 2: 17-23.