Smart Growth and State Territoriality

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2275-2292

  Dierwechter, Yonn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; METROPOLITAN AREA; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; SOCIAL THEORY; STATE LED DEVELOPMENT; TERRITORIALITY; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

SEATTLE; TACOMA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84880647580     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013478230     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. AdamsB. (2010) When smart growth is not and the NIMBY is (http://urbdezine.com/2010/11/29/sustainable-development-when-smart-growth-is-dumb-and-the-nimby-is-smart/; accessed 9 December 2010).
2. Almond G.The return to the state.American Political Science Review. 1988;82 (3): 853-874.
3. Amin A.,Graham N. S.The ordinary city.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1997;22:411-429.
4. Antonio R.Max Weber in the post-World War II US and after.Etica & Politica. 2005;7 (2):.
5. Policy guide on smart growth. Chicago, IL: APA; 2002:.
6. Brenner N.State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960-1990.Political Geography. 1997;16 (4): 273-306.
7. Brenner N.Decoding the newest 'metropolitan regionalism' in the USA: a critical overview.Cities. 2002;19 (1): 3-21.
8. Brenner N.,Theodore N.Cities and the 'actually existing' geographies of neoliberalism.Antipode. 2002;34 (3): 349-379.
9. Budd W.,Lovrich N.,Pierce J.,Chamberlain B.Cultural sources of variations in US urban sustainability attributes.Cities. 2008;25 (5): 257-267.
10. Growing Smarter: Achieving Livable Communities, Environmental Justice, and Regional Equity. Bullard R., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:.
11. Burchell R.,Listokin D.,Galley C.Smart growth: more than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon.Housing Policy Debate. 2000;11 (4): 821-879.
12. Carruthers J.,Úlfarsson G.Does 'smart growth' matter to public finance?.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (9): 1791-1823.
13. Cascade County Committee (2005) Quotes from the people (www.cascadecounty.kendra.com/; accessed 7 May 2007).
14. Choat S.Marx through Post-structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze. London: Continuum; 2010:.
15. Cooke P.Theories of Planning and Spatial Development. London: Hutchinson; 1983:.
16. Cox K.Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002:.
17. Cox K.,Mair A.Urban growth machines and the politics of local economic development.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1989;13:137-146.
18. Daniels T.Smart growth: a new American approach to regional planning.Planning Practice and Research. 2001;16 (3/4): 271-279.
19. Dierwechter Y.Urban Growth Management and Its Discontents: Promises, Practices, and Geopolitics in US City-regions. New York: Palgrave; 2008:.
20. The City in American Political Development. Dilworth R., ed. New York: Routledge; 2009:.
21. Downs A.What does smart growth really mean?.Planning. 2001;67 (4): 20-25.
22. Erie S.,Mackenzie S.The L.A. school and politics noir: bringing the local state back.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2009;31 (5): 537-557.
23. Ethington P.,Levitus D.The City in American Political Development. Dilworth R., ed. New York: Routledge; 2009:154-176.
24. Ethington P.,McDaniel J.Political places and institutional spaces: the intersection of political science and political geography.Annual Review of Political Science. 2007;10 (June): 127-142.
25. Ewing R.,King M. R.,Raudenbush S.,Clemente O. J.Turning highways into main streets: two innovations in planning methodology.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2005;71 (3): 269-282.
26. Fainstein S.New directions in planning theory.Urban Affairs Review. 2000;35 (4): 451-478.
27. Filion P.,McSpurren K.Smart growth and development reality: the difficult coordination of land use and transport objectives.Urban Studies. 2007;44 (15): 501-523.
28. Giddens AThe Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Weber M., ed. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons; 1976:vii-xxiv.
29. Harvey D.From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism.Geografiska Annaler. 1989;71B (1): 3-17.
30. Hayward C.The difference states make: democracy, identity, and the American city.American Political Science Review. 2003;97 (4): 501-514.
31. Huxley M.Spatial rationalities: order, environment, evolution and government.Social and Cultural Geography. 2006;7 (5): 771-787.
32. Huxley M.The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography. Cox K.Low M.Robinson J., ed. London: SAGE; 2008:123-141.
33. Immergut E.The theoretical core of the new institutionalism.Politics and Society. 1998;26 (1): 5-34.
34. Jessop B.State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990:.
35. King D.,Lieberman R.Ironies of state building: a comparative perspective on the American state.World Politics. 2009;61 (3): 547-588.
36. Kipfer S.,Keil R.Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in the new Toronto.Antipode. 2002;34:227-264.
37. Knapp G.,Talen E.New urbanism and smart growth: a few words from the academy.International Regional Science Review. 2005;28 (2): 107-118.
38. Krasner S.Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics.Comparative Politics. 1984;16 (2): 223-246.
39. Krueger R.,Agyeman J.Sustainability schizophrenia or actually existing sustainabilities? The politics and promise of a sustainability agenda in the US.Geoforum. 2005;36 (4): 410-417.
40. Landis D.Growth management revisited: efficacy, price effects, and displacement.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2006;72 (4): 411-430.
41. Langlois P.Municipal visions, market realities: does planning guide residential development?.Environment and Planning B. 2010;37 (3): 449-462.
42. Langston J.Critical areas ordinance provokes bitter 'rural vs. urban' dispute.Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 2004;:B1.
43. Leo C.Regional growth management regime: the case of Portland, Oregon.Journal of Urban Affairs. 1998;20 (4): 363-394.
44. Levine J.Zoned Out. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 2006:.
45. Levine N.The effects of local growth controls on residential housing production and population redistribution in California.Urban Studies. 1999;36 (12): 2047-2068.
46. Lewis P.,Neiman M.Custodians of Place: Governing the Growth and Development of Cities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:.
47. LitmanT. (2009) Evaluating criticisms of smart growth. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org; accessed 2 December 2010).
48. Luccarelli M.Lewis Mumford and the Ecological Region: The Politics of Planning. New York: Guilford Press; 1993:.
49. Mann M.The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results.European Journal of Sociology. 1984;25:185-212.
50. Marcus A.Interrogating the neo-pluralist orthodoxy in American anthropology.Dialectical Anthropology. 2008;32 (1): 59-86.
51. McClureR. (2011) Odd provision in state law severely undercuts growth management. Crosscut, 12January (http://crosscut.com/2011/01/12/environment/20527/Odd-provision-in-state-law-severely-undercuts-growth-management/; accessed 13 January 2011).
52. McGuirk P.Economic restructuring and the realignment of the urban planning system: the case of Dublin.Urban Studies. 1993;31 (2): 287-308.
53. Meadowcroft J.The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Berry J.Eckersley R., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:3-24.
54. Molotch H. L.The city as growth machine: toward a political economy of place.American Journal of Sociology. 1976;82:309-331.
55. MRSC (Municipal Research and Services Center) (2009) Vested rights. MRSC, Washington, DC (www.mrsc.org/subjects/legal/vestedrights.aspx; accessed 12 December 2010).
56. Nordlinger E.The return to the state: critiques.American Political Science Review. 1988;82 (3): 875-901.
57. Orren K.,Skowronek S.Political Order. Shapiro L.Hardin R., ed. New York: Free Press; 1996:111-146.
58. Orren K.,Skowronek S.The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
59. O'TooleR. (2000) Is urban planning 'creeping socialism'?, The Independent Review (http://www.independent.org; accessed 17 January 2010).
60. Pallagst K.Growth Management in the US: Between Theory and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:.
61. Polanyi K.The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1944:.
62. Sack R.Human territoriality: a theory.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1983;73 (1): 55-74.
63. SanchezJ. (2003) Form-based codes: Implementing smart growth local government commission (www.lgc.org/freepub/PDF/Land_Use/fact_sheets/form_based_codes.pdf; accessed 4 March 2007).
64. Scott J. W.Smart growth as urban reform: a pragmatic 'recoding' of the new regionalism.Urban Studies. 2007;44 (1): 15-35.
65. Seltzer E.The Portland Edge: Challenges and Success in Growing Communities. Ozawa C., ed. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2004:35-60.
66. Settle R.,Gavigon C.The growth management revolution in Washington: past, present and future.University of Puget Sound Law Review. 1993;16 (1): 867-948.
67. Skocpol T.Political responses to capitalist crisis: neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.Politics and Society. 1980;10:155-202.
68. Skocpol T.Bringing the State Back In. Evans P.Rueschemeyer D.Skocpol T., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985:3-42.
69. Skocpol T.Bringing the state back in: retrospect and prospect.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2008;31 (2): 109-124.
70. Skowronek S.Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982:.
71. The states and the stimulus. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America; 2009:.
72. Stone C.Regime Politics. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press; 1989:.
73. Storper M.The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press; 1997:.
74. Smart Growth: Form and Consequences. Szold T.Carbonell A., ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2002:.
75. Talen E.New Urbanism and American Planning: The Conflicts of Cultures. New York: Routledge; 2005:.
76. Talen E.,Knaap G.Legalizing smart growth: an empirical study of land use regulation in Illinois.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;2 (3): 345-359.
77. Ward K.,Jonas A. E. G.Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: a critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism.Environment and Planning A. 2004;36 (12): 2119-2139.
78. Watson V.Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics.Planning Theory and Practice. 2003;4 (4): 395-407.
79. Weitz J.From quiet revolution to smart growth: state growth management programs.Journal of Planning Literature. 1999 1960 1999;14 (2): 266-337.
80. While A.,Jonas A.,Gibbs D.The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban 'sustainability fix' in Manchester and Leeds.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2004;28 (3): 549-569.
81. Wolfe J.State power and ideology in Britain: Mrs Thatcher's privatization programme.Political Studies. 1991;39:237-252.
82. Yiftachel O.Essay: re-engaging planning theory? Towards 'south-eastern' perspectives.Planning Theory. 2007;5:211-222.
83. Yin M.,Sun J.The impacts of state growth management programs on urban sprawl in the 1990s.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2007;29 (2): 149-179.
84. Zharan S.,Grover H.,Brody S.,Vedlitz A.Risk, stress, and capacity: explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection.Urban Affairs Review. 2008;43 (4): 447-474.