Method and model comparison by sum of ranking differences in cases of repeated observations (ties)

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 127, Issue , 2013, Pages 139-146

  Kollár Hunek, Klára ^a   Héberger, Károly ^b  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Data pre treatment; Feature selection; Method comparison; Permutation test; Ranking; Sensory evaluation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; RANK SUM TEST; SENSORY EVALUATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84880681888     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Héberger K. Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly. TrAC Trends Analytical Chemistry 2010, 29:101-109.
2. Héberger K., Kollár-Hunek K. Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25:151-158.
3. Acanski M.M., Vujic D.N., Jovanovic-Santa S. Separation and lipophilicity of some new steroid derivatives in normal- and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly 2011, 17:535-542.
4. Héberger K., Zenkevich I.G. Comparison of physicochemical and gas chromatographic polarity measures for simple organic compounds. Journal of Chromatography. A 2010, 1217:2895-2902.
5. Bielicka-Daszkiewicz K., Voelkel A., Héberger K., Pietrzyńska M. Role of Hansen solubility parameters in solid phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography. A 2010, 1217:5564-5570.
6. Kollár-Hunek K., Heszberger J., Kókai Z., Láng-Lázi M., Papp E. Testing panel consistency with GCAP method in food profile analysis. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 22:218-226.
7. Sipos L., Kovács Z., Szöllösi D., Kokai Z., Dalmadi I., Fekete A. Comparison of novel sensory panel performance evaluation techniques with e-nose analysis integration. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25:275-286.
8. Wood J.E., Allaway D., Boult E., Scott I.M. Operationally realistic validation for prediction of cocoa sensory qualities by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82:6048-6055.
9. Losó V., Tóth A., Gere A., Heszberger J., Székely G., Kókai Z., Sipos L. Methodology problems of the industrial preference mapping. Acta Alimentaria 2012, 41:109-119.
10. Vajna B., Patyi G., Nagy Z., Bódis A., Farkas A., Marosi G. Comparison of chemometric methods in the analysis of pharmaceuticals with hyperspectral Raman imaging. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 2011, 42:1977-1986.
11. Gowen A.A., Downey G., Esquerre C., O'Donnell C.P. Preventing over-fitting in PLS calibration models of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data using regression coefficients. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25:375-381.
12. Fragkaki A.G., Farmaki E., Thomaidis N., Tsantili-Kakoulidou A., Angelis Y.S., Koupparis M., Georgakopoulos C. Comparison of multiple linear regression, partial least squares and artificial neural networks for prediction of gas chromatographic relative retention times of trimethylsilylated anabolic androgenic steroids. Journal of Chromatography. A 2012, 1256:232-239.
13. Héberger K., Škrbić B. Ranking and similarity for quantitative structure-retention relationship models in predicting Lee retention indices of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Analytica Chimica Acta 2012, 716:92-100.
14. Rocha M.J., Ferreira P.C., Reis P.A., Cruzeiro C., Rocha E. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coastal sediments from the Porto region (Portugal) by microwave-assisted extraction, followed by SPME and GC-MS. Journal of Chromatographic Science 2011, 49:695-701.
15. Kar S., Roy K. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines. Chemosphere 2012, 87:339-355.
16. Ojha P.K., Roy K. Comparative QSARs for antimalarial endochins: importance of descriptor-thinning and noise reduction prior to feature selection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011, 109:146-161.
17. Djakovic-Sekulic T., Mandic A., Trisovic N., Uscumlic G. Structure-retention relationship study of HPLC data of antiepileptic hydantoin analogues. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design 2012, 8:3-9.
18. Garkani-Nejad Z., Ahmadvand M. Comparative QSRR modeling of nitrobenzene derivatives based on original molecular descriptors and multivariate image analysis descriptors. Chromatographia 2011, 73:733-742.
19. α NMR chemical shifts using a combination scheme of statistical modeling and quantum-mechanical analysis. Journal of Molecular Structure 2011, 995:163-172.
20. Bolboaca S.D., Jaentschi L. Diagnostic of a QSPR model: aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Chemia 2010, 55:69-76.
21. Vajna B., Farkas A., Pataki H., Zsigmond Z., Igricz T., Marosi G. Testing the performance of pure spectrum resolution from Raman hyperspectral images of differently manufactured pharmaceutical tablets. Analytica Chimica Acta 2012, 712:45-55.
22. Tangni E.K., Motte J.-C., Callebaut A., Chandelier A., De Schrijver M., Marnix L., Pussemier L. Deoxynivalenol loads in matched pair wheat samples in Belgium: comparison of ELISA VERATOX kit against liquid chromatography. Mycotoxin Research 2011, 27:105-113.
23. Balogh G.T., Tarcsay Á., Keseru G.M. Comparative evaluation of pK(a) prediction tools on a drug discovery dataset. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2012, 67-68:63-70.
24. 2(rank) metric incorporating rank-order predictions as an additional tool for validation of QSAR/QSPR models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2012, 118:200-210.
25. Youden W.J. Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Statistical Techniques for Collaborative Test 1997, 1-63. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, (8th printing).
26. Losó V., Gere A., Györey A., Kókai Z., Sipos L. Comparison of the performance of a trained and an untrained sensory panel on sweetcorn varieties with the PanelCheck software. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 2012, 1-2:77-83.
27. Carbó S., Humphrey D., Maudos J., Molyneux P. Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking. Journal of International Money and Finance 2009, 28:115-134.