Structure-retention relationship study of HPLC data of antiepileptic hydantoin analogues

Current Computer-Aided Drug Design

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-9

  Djaković Sekulić, Tatjana ^a   Mandić, Anamarija ^b   Trišović, Nemanja ^c   Uščumlić, Gordana ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Activity; Antiepileptic hydantoin analogues; Liquid chromatography; Multiple linear regression (MLR); Principal component analysis (PCA); Quantitative structure retention relationship (QSRR); Sum of ranking differences (SRD)

Indexed keywords

ACETONITRILE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ACTIVITY; ANTIEPILEPTIC HYDANTOIN ANALOG; ANTIEPILEPTICS; HYDANTOINS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSE; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-RETENTION RELATIONSHIP; SUM OF RANKING DIFFERENCE;

MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION;

ACETONITRILE; HYDANTOIN DERIVATIVE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DRUG RETENTION; DRUG STRUCTURE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE RETENTION RELATIONSHIP; REVERSED PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84857696276     PISSN: 15734099     EISSN: 18756697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157340912799218525     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ware, E. The Chemistry of Hydantoins. Chem. Rev., 1950, 46, 403-470.
2. Lopez, C.A.; Trigo, G.G. The Chemistry of Hydantoins. Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A.R., Ed.; Academic Press: New York 1985, Vol. 38, pp. 177-228.
3. Knabe, J.; Baldauf, J.; Ahlhem, A. Racemates and enantiomers of basic substituted 5-phenylhydantoins. Syntheses and antiarrhythmic activity. Pharmazie, 1997, 52, 912-919.
4. Scholl, S.; Koch, A.; Henning, D.; Kempter, G.; Kleinpeter, E. The influence of structure and lipophilicity of hydantoin derivatives on anticonvulsant activity. Struct. Chem., 1999, 10, 355-366.
5. Perucca, E. The new generation of antiepileptic drugs: advantages and disadvantages. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 1996, 42, 531-543.
6. Luer, M.S. Fosphenytoin. Neurol. Res., 1998, 20, 178-182.
7. Somsák, L.; Kovács, L.; Tóth, M.; Osz, E.; Szilágyi, L.; Györgydeák, Z.; Dinya, Z.; Docsa, T.; Tóth, B.; Gergely, P. Synthesis of and a comparative study on the inhibition of muscle and liver glycogen phosphorylases by epimeric pairs of D-glucoand D-xylopyranosylidene-spiro-(thio)hydantoins and N- (DgGlucopyranosyl) amides. J. Med. Chem., 2001, 44, 2843-2848.
8. Rodgers, T.R.; LaMontagne, M.P.; Markovac, A.; Ash, A.B. Hydantoins as antitumor agents. J. Med. Chem., 1977, 20, 591-594.
9. Yaari, Y.; Selzer, M.E.; Pincus, J.H. Phenytoin: mechanisms of its anticonvulsant action. Ann. Neurol., 1986, 20, 171-184.
10. Reichel, A. The role of blood-brain barrier studies in the pharmaceutical industry. Curr. Drug Metabol., 2006, 7, 183-203.
11. Proudfoot, J.R. The evolution of synthetic oral drug properties. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 1087-1090.
12. Leeson, P.D.; Davis, A.M. Time-related differences in the physical property profiles of oral drugs. J. Med Chem., 2004, 47, 6338-6348.
13. Kaliszan, R. Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships. Wiley: New York, 1987.
14. Kaliszan, R. Quantitative structure-retention relationships applied to reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A, 1993, 656, 417-435.
15. Kaliszan, R.; van Straten, M.A.; Markuszewski, M.; Cramer, C.A.; Claessens, C.A. Molecular mechanism of retention in reversedphase high-performance liquid chromatography and classification of modern stationary phases by using quantitative structure-retention relationships. J. Chromatogr. A, 1999, 855, 455-486.
16. Markuszewski, M.; Kaliszan, R. Quantitative structure-retention relationships in affinity high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B, 2002, 768, 55-66.
17. Poupaert, J.H.; Vandervarst, D.; Guiot, P.; Moustafa, M.M.M.; Dumont, P. Structure-activity relationship of phenytoin-like anticonvulsant drugs. J. Med. Chem., 1984, 27, 76-78.
18. Vida, J.A.; Samour, C.M.; Reinhard, J.F. Anticonvulsants. 1. Alkoxymethyl derivatives barbiturates diphenylhydantoin. J. Med. Chem., 1971, 14, 187-189.
19. Bucherer, H.; Steiner, W. Syntheses of hydantoins. I. Reactions of a-hydroxy and a-amino nitriles. J. Prakt. Chem., 1934, 140, 291-316.
20. Chemdraw Ultra 6.0 and Chem3D Ultra, Cambridge Soft Corporation, Cambridge, USA. Available at: http://cambridgesoft.com
21. Talete srl, DRAGON for Windows (software for Molecular Descriptor Calculations). Version 5.5., 2007. Available at: http://www.talete.mi.it/ [Accessed December 15, 2010]
22. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.1. StatSoft, Inc., 2010. Available at: www.statsoft.com
23. Wold, S.; Esbensen, K.; Geladi, P. Principal components analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 1987, 2, 37-52.
24. Giaginis, C.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. The current state of the art in HPLC methodology for lipophilicity assessment of basic drugs. J. Liqu. Chromatogr., 2008, 31, 79-96.
25. Natalini, B.; Sardella, R.; Camaioni, E.; Macchiarulo, A.; Gioiello, A.; Carbone, G.; Pellicciari, R. Derived chromatographic indices as effective tools to study the self-aggregation process of bile acids. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2009, 50, 613-621.
26. Unverferth, K.; Engel, J.; Höfgen, N.; Rostock, A.; Günther, R.; Lankau, H.; Menzer, M.; Rolfs, A.; Liebscher, J.; Müller, B.; Hofmann, H. Synthesis, anticonvulsant activity, and structureactivity relationships of sodium channel blocking 3-aminopyrroles. J. Med. Chem., 1998, 41, 63-73.
27. Jones, G.L.; Woodbury, D.M. Anticonvulsant structure-activity relationships: Historical development and probable causes of failure. Drug Dev. Res., 1982, 2, 333-355.
28. 2! J. Mol. Graphics Mod., 2002, 20, 269-276.
29. Wold, S. Validation of QSARs. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 1991, 10, 191-193.
30. Héberger, K.; Kollár-Hunek, K. Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers. J. Chemometrics, 2011, 25, 151-158.
31. Heberger, K. Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 2009, 29, 101-109.
32. Djaković-Sekulić, T.; Lozanov-Crvenković, Z.; Mandić, A.; Uščumlić, G.; Keleman, S. Quantitative structure-retention relationship study of some 5-substituted-5-phenylhydantoins. Chromatographia, 2011, 73, 51-57.