Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement : Technical aspects and clinical outcome

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 312-317

  Robb, Curtis A ^a   Matharu, Gulraj S ^a   Baloch, Khalid ^a   Pynsent, Paul B ^a  

^a ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Revision; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84880635196     PISSN: 00016462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip : A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1984 ; 66-A : 228-241.
2. Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee : Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 1998 ; 13 : 191-196.
3. Chou DT, Swamy GN, Lewis JR, Badhe NP. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012 ; 19 : 356-359.
4. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1998 ; 80-B : 63-69.
5. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 ; 248 : 9-12.
6. Gill T, Schemitsch EH, Brick GW, Thornhill TS. Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995 ; 321 : 10-18.
7. Hang JR, Stanford TE, Graves SE et al. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement : 1,948 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 1999-2008. Acta Orthop 2010 ; 81 : 95-98.
8. Järvenpää J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kröger H. The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty : 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 2010 ; 34 : 649-653.
9. Johnson S, Jones P, Newman JH. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental replacements. Knee 2007 ; 14 : 154-157.
10. Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Kaijser Bots PC et al. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2010 ; 17 : 48-52.
11. Martin JG, Wallace DA, Woods DA, Carr AJ, Murray DW. Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 1995 ; 2 : 121-125.
12. Matharu G, Robb C, Baloch K, Pynsent P. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement : Survival and the effect of age and gender. Knee 2012 ; 19 : 913-917.
13. Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1991 ; 73-A : 186-190.
14. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartment knee replacement : Results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 2011 ; 93-B : 198-204.
15. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement : The New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg 2010 ; 92-B : 508-512.
16. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II : Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977 ; 35 : 1-39.
17. Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty : Outcomes and standards for surgical audit. J Bone Joint Surg 2005 ; 87-B : 241-248.
18. R Development Core Team. R : A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna : R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2009.
19. Rancourt MF, Kemp KA, Plamondon SM, Kim PR, Dervin GF. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties revised to total knee arthroplasties compared with primary total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2012 ; 27 : 106-110.
20. Revell PA. The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 2008 ; 5 : 1263-1278.
21. Saldanha KA, Keys GW, Svard UC, White SH, Rao C. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty : Results of a multi-centre study. Knee 2007 ; 14 : 275-279.
22. Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE. Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty : Strategy and results. Int Orthop 2009 ; 33 : 969-974.
23. Williams DH, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. Predictors of participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012 ; 470 : 555-561.
24. Wynn Jones H, Chan W, Harrison T et al. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement : Similar to a primary ? Knee 2012 ; 19 : 339-343.