The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 241-248

  Pynsent, P B ^a   Adams, D J ^a   Disney, S P ^a  

^a ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL PATIENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 14144252629     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15095     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation in acetabular fractures: treatment by mould arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
2. Charnley J. Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54-B:61-76.
3. Drake BG, Callahan CM, Dittus RS, Wright JG. Global rating systems in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:409-17.
4. Davies AP. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 2002;9:261-6.
5. Pynsent PB. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:792-4.
6. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:185-90.
7. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perception of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-9.
8. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000;25:2940-53.
9. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 1996;5-3:299-314.
10. Hanna AW, Pynsent PB, Learmonth DJ, Tubbs ON. A new computer-based triage tool for patients with knee disorders. Knee 2000;7:79-86.
11. Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT. Computer interview system for patients with back pain. J Biomed Eng 1989;11:25-9.
12. Aderinto J, Cobb AG. Lateral release for patellofemoral arthritis. Arthroscopy 2002: 18:399-403.
13. Gidwani S, Tauro B, Whitehouse S, Newman JH. Do patients have to earn total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2003;18:199-203.
14. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
15. Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bellamy N. Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form medical outcomes study survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:172-9.
16. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, et al. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000; 27:2635-41.
17. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: results of a survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:339-44.
18. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:268-74.
19. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
20. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn D. Survival analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
21. McGrory BJ, Harris WH. Can the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index be used to evaluate different hip joints in the same patient? J Arthroplasty 1996;11:841-4.
22. McMurray R, Heaton J, Sloper P, Nettleton S. Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods. Qual Health Care 1999;8:228-33.
23. Harcourt WG, White SH, Jones P. Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire: the effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:345-7.
24. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2001;16: 476-82.
25. Fitzpatrick R, Morris R, Hajat S, et al. The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 2000;9:146-50.
26. Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton M, et al. Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery: a review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using revision rates, survival analysis, and patient-based measures. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:710-17.
27. Palmer SH, Servant CT, Maguire J, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Ability to kneel after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:220-2.
28. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. J Health Ser Res Policy 1996;1:224-31.