Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: 1,948 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 1999-2008

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 95-98

  Hang, Jacqueline R ^a   Stanford, Tyman E ^b   Graves, Stephen E ^a   Davidson, David C ^a   De Steiger, Richard N ^a   Miller, Lisa N ^b  

^a AOA National Joint Replacement Registry   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REGISTER; REOPERATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950514041     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453671003628731     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AOANJRR Annual report. Hip and knee arthroplasty. Adelaide, Australia 2009.
2. Barrett W P, Scott R D. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69 (9): 1328-1335
3. Berger R A, Nedeff D D, Barden R M, Sheinkop M M, Jacobs J J, Rosenberg A G, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 1999; (367): 50-60.
4. Cameron H U, Jung YB. A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement. Orthop Rev 1988; 17: 983-988 (Pubitemid 19040128)
5. Chakrabarty G, Newman J H, Ackroyd C E. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (2): 191-196 (Pubitemid 28106822)
6. Dudley T E, Gioe T J, Sinner P, Mehle S. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop 2008; (466): 1666-1670
7. Engh CA, Jr. Orthopaedic crossfire - can we justify unicondylar arthoplasty as a temporizing procedure? in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2002; 17: 54-55
8. Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie S A, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89 (3): 519-525 (Pubitemid 46371267)
9. Johnson S, Jones P, Newman J H. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007; 14 (2): 154-157 (Pubitemid 46275452)
10. Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65 (4): 375-386 (Pubitemid 24331041)
11. Kozinn S C, Scott R D. Current concepts review: unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1989; 71: 145-150 (Pubitemid 19070405)
12. Lai C H, Rand J A. Revision of failed unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993; (287): 193-201. (Pubitemid 23095052)
13. Levine W N, Ozuna R M, Scott R D, Thornhill T S. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (7): 797-801. (Pubitemid 26393858)
14. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (5): 469-474
15. Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop 1973; (94): 242-248
16. Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten to 13 year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1988; (226): 14-17
17. McAuley J P, Engh G A, Ammeen D J. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; (392): 279-282
18. Newman J, Pydisetty R V, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or totak knee replacement. The 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91: 52-57
19. Padgett D E, Stern S H, Insall J N. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73 (2): 186-190
20. Rand J A, Bryan R S. Results of revision total knee arthroplasties using condylar prostheses. A review of fifty knees. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70 (5): 738-745
21. Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55, 298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003; 4: 1.
22. Springer B D, Scott R D, Thornhill T S. Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop 2006; (446): 214-220 (Pubitemid 44318284)