Analyzing and presenting interaction data: A teacher, student and researcher perspective

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 3, 2008, Pages 375-382

  Van Diggelen, Wouter ^a   Janssen, Jeroen ^a   Overdijk, Maarten ^a   Asterhan, Christa S C ^b   Hever, Rakheli ^b   Schwarz, Baruch B ^b   Erkens, Gijsbert ^a   Kirschner, Paul ^a   Kanselaar, Gellof ^a   Lund, Kristine ^c   Dyke, Gregory ^d   Girardot, Jean Jacques ^d   Corbel, Annie ^d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^d ECOLE DES MINES DE SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMEDIATE FEEDBACKS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS;

RESEARCH;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880425565     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. B. (in press). Argumentative Design. In A-N. Perret-Clermont and N. Muller-Mirza (Eds.). Argumentation and Education - Contributions in Argumentation, Communicative Interactions and Education. Advanced Series in Learning and Instruction, Elsevier.
2. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (under review). E-moderation of synchronous argumentative dialogue: First findings from multiple sources.
3. Börner, K., Hazlewood, W.R., & Lin, S.M. (2002). Visualizing the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of User Interaction Data Collected in Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds. First International Symposium on Collaborative Information Visualization Environments (CIVE 2002), London, UK. Retrieved November 17, 2007 from http://vw.indiana.edu/cive02/004-borner- VisSpatialTemporal.pdf
4. Broeken, M., Jaspers, J., & Erkens, G. (2006). Virtual Collaborative Research Institute (VCRI). Version 2.3. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
5. Dourish, P., & Belotti, V. (1992). Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp.107-114).
6. Dyke, G., Girardot, J.-J., Lund, K., & Corbel, A. (2007). Analysing face to face computer-mediated interactions. EARLI (European Association for Research, Learning and Instruction), 12th Biennial International Conference, University of Szeged, Eötvös Lorand University, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Budapest, Hungary. August 28-September 1, 2007.
7. Erkens, G. (1997). Coöperatief probleemoplossen met computers in het onderwijs: Het modellering van coöperatieve dialogen voor de ontwikkeling van intelligente onderwijssystemen [Cooperative problem solving with computers in education: Modelling cooperative dialogues for the development of intelligent educational systems]. Unpublished PhD. thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
8. Gil, J., Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan C. S. C. (2007). Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCL-based argumentation. In: C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 Vol. 8.
9. Hever, R., De Groot, R., de Laat, M., Harrer, A., Hoppe, U., McLaren, B. M., & Scheuer, O. (2007). Combining structural, process-oriented and textual elements to generate awareness indicators for graphical e-discussions. In: C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007, Vol. 8.
10. Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Unpublished PhD thesis, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
11. Littlejohn, S. (2002). Theories of Human Communication. Albuquerque: Wadsworth.
12. Lund, K., Rossetti, C., & Metz, S. (2007). Do internal factors of cooperation influence computer-mediated distance activity? In: C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds), The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 Vol. 8.
13. Lund, K., Molinari, G., Séjourné, A., & Baker, M.J. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate?". International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2, 273-295
14. Overdijk, M., & Van Diggelen, W. (in Press). Appropriation of a graphical shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.
15. Ronteltap, F., Goodyear, P., & Bartoluzzi, S. (2004). A Pattern Language as an Instrument in Designing for Productive Learning Conversations. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 4271-4276). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
16. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G, 1978. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In: J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 7-55). Academic Press, New York. (First published 1974, Language 50: 696-735).
17. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-99.
18. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (in press). Argumentation and Reasoning. To appear in: K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds). Elsevier Handbook of Educational Psychology: New Perspectives on Learning and Teaching. Elsevier.
20. Schwarz, B. B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
21. Ware, C. (2005). Visual queries: The foundation of visual thinking. In S. O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization: Searching for synergies (Vol. 3426, pp. 27-35). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
22. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher's role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423-440.