Do internal factors of cooperation influence computer-mediated distance activity?

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 466-475

  Lund, Kristine ^a   Rossetti, Céline ^a   Metz, Stéphanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS;

COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; COOPERATIVE ACTIVITY; DYADIC INTERACTION; INTERNAL FACTORS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 84861063907     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599600.1599688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Baker, M.J. (2002). Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 16 (4-5), 587-620.
3. Baker, M.J. & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 13, 175-193.
4. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, Vol. 4, (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
5. Benford, S. D., Bullock, A. N., Cook, N. L., Harvey, P. W., Ingram, R. J. and Lee, O., (1993). A Spatial Model of Cooperation for Virtual Worlds. In Proceedings of Informatique '93: Interfaces to Real and Virtual Worlds, Montpelier, France, March 1993.
6. Burton, M., Brna, P. and Treasure-Jones, T. (1997). Splitting the Collaborative Atom: How to Support Learning about Collaboration. In du Boulay, B. and Mizoguchi, R. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems, 135-142. IOS, Amsterdam.
7. Corbel, A., Girardot, J.J., Jaillon, P. (2002). DREW: A Dialogical Reasoning Web Tool, In Proceedings of ICTE2002, International Conference on ICT's in Education. Badajoz, Espagne, November 13-16, 2002.
8. Corbel, A., Jaillon, P., Serpaggi, X., Baker, M., Quignard, M., Lund, K., (2003). DREW: Un outil internet pour créer des situations d'apprentissage coopérant [DREW: An internet tool for creating co-operative learning situations]. In Desmoulins, Marquet, & Bouhineau (Eds.), Proeedings of EIAH2003 Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain (pp. 109-113). Strasbourg.
9. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1) 6-28.
10. Dyke, G. (2006). Extension of the Musette framework for synchronous collective activities. Unpublished Masters Thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
11. Fjuk, A., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (1997). Articulation of Actions in Distributed Collaborative Learning. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 3-24.
12. Gachet, A.et Haettenschwiler, P. (2003). Distributed Decision Support Systems - A Federalist Model of Cooperation, in Bisdorff R. (ed.) Human Centered Processes - Distributed Decision Making and Man-Machine Cooperation, proceedings of the 14th MINI EURO Conference Luxembourg, (pp. 211-216).
13. Grégori, N. et Brassac, C. (2001). La conception collaborative d'artefacts: activités cognitives en situation dialogique [The collaborative design of artifacts: cognitive activities in dialogical situations] In ÉPIQUE, Journées d'étude en psychologie ergonomique, Nantes, October 29-30, 2001, pp. 21-31.
14. Jakobsson, A. (2002). Learning Attitudes Decisive to Students Cognitive and Knowledge Development, In ICCE02, International Conference on Computers in Education, p. 1025.
15. Krafft, Ulrich & Dausendschön-Gay, (1999). Système écrivant et processus de mise en mots dans les rédactions conversationnelles [Writing system and the process of putting into words in conversational writing]. Langages, 134, 51-67.
16. Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). The nature of collaboration in computer-supported designing. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings., & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. (pp. 381-388). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht McLuhan Institute.
17. Lund, K. Analyse de l'activité explicative en interaction: étude de dialogues d'enseignants de physique en formation interprétant les interactions entre élèves [The analysis of interactive explanatory activity: a study of physics student teachers' dialogues as they interpret student interactions. Ph.D., Université J. Fourier, 2003.
18. Scott, S. D., Mandryk, R. L, & Inkpen, K. M. (2002). Understanding children's interactions in synchronous shared environments, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Boulder, CO, USA. January 2002. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
19. Strauss, A. (1993). Continual Permutations of Actions. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
20. Suangsuwan, J., Wiratchai, N., & Wongwanich, S. A Development of indicators, and the Cause and Effect Model of Collaboration of Primary School Teacher in Ayutthaya province, Thailand. Downloaded April 28, 2006 from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/sua05024.pdf
21. Van Amelsvoort, M. & Andriessen, J. Is the tone set? How the start of the social relation between two students defines the content collaboration. Downloaded April 28, 2006 from http://edu.fss.uu.nl/ord/fullpapers/Amelsvoort- Erkens.doc