Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of "teacher" and "student" interactions as a function of training and experience

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 134-149

  Ginsburg Block, Marika ^a   Fantuzzo, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17744387407     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0088955     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beatty, L. S., Madden, R., Gardner, E. F., & Karlsen, B. ( 1986). Stanford diagnostic mathematics test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
2. Enright, B. E. (1983). Enright diagnostic inventory of basic arithmetic skills. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
3. Fantuzzo, J., Davis, G., & Ginsburg, M. (1995). Effects of collaborative learning and parent involvement on mathematics achievement and perceived competencies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 272-281.
4. Fantuzzo, J. F., Polite, K., & Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 309-323.
5. Fantuzzo, J. F., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331-339.
6. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Rohrbeck, C. A. (1992). Self-managed groups: Fitting self-management approaches into classroom systems. School Psychology Review. 21, 255-263.
7. Fogarty, J. L., & Wang, M. C. (1982). An investigation of the cross-age tutoring process: Some implications for instructional design and motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 82, 451-469.
8. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Philipps, N., & Hamlett, C. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 75-103.
9. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258-275.
10. Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Terry, B., Wade, L., Stanley, S. O., Thibadeau, S., & Delquadri J. C. (1984). Teacher-versus peer mediated instruction: An ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 521-538.
11. Greer, R. D., & Polirstok, S. R. (1982). Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by inner-city adolescents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 123-139.
12. Harter, S. (1985). Self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
13. Heller L. R., & Fantuzzo J. F. (1993). Reciprocal peer tutoring and parent partnership: Does parent involvement make a difference? School Psychology Review, 22, 517-534.
14. Kohler, F. W., & Greenwood, C. R. (1990). Effects of collateral peer supportive behaviors within the classwide peer tutoring program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 307-322.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
16. Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429-445.
17. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1983). How much "opportunity to respond" foes the minority disadvantaged student receive in school? Exceptional Children, 49, 370-373.
19. Webb, N., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.