Support Vector Machine based modeling of an industrial natural gas sweetening plant

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages 121-131

  Adib, Hooman ^a   Sharifi, Fatemeh ^b   Mehranbod, Nasir ^a   Kazerooni, Nooshin Moradi ^a   Koolivand, Mehdi ^c  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Absorption column; Amine regenerator column; Gas sweetening plant; Support Vector Machine

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION COLUMNS; ACCURATE ESTIMATION; GAS SWEETENING PLANTS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODEL ESTIMATION; OPERATING PLANTS; PROCESS VARIABLES; SQUARED CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS;

ESTIMATION; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84880358053     PISSN: 18755100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2013.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abedini R., KoolivandSalooki M., Ghasemian S. Modeling and simulation of condensed sulfur in catalytic beds of Claus process: rapid estimation. Chem. Eng. Res. Bull. 2010, 14:110-114.
2. 3 catalyst using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J.Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2013, 10:14-24.
3. Agarwal S., Saradhi V.V., Karnick H. Kernel-based online machine learning and support vector reduction. Neurocomputing 2008, 71:1230-1237.
4. Balabin R.M., Lomakina E.I. Support Vector Machine regression (LS-SVM) - an alternative to artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the analysis of quantum chemistry data. J.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13:11710-11718.
5. Bertsekas, Dimitri P. Nonlinear Programming 1999, Athena Scientific, Cambridge. second ed.
6. Buisman C.J.N., Lettinga G., Paasschens C.W.M., Habets L.H.A. Biotechnological sulphide removal from effluents. Water Sci. Technol. 1991, 24:347-356.
7. 2 removal. Proc. of 69th Gas Processors Association Convention, New Orleans, Louisiana 1984.
8. Campbell J.M. Gas Conditioning and Processing 1976, USA. seventh ed.
9. Castillo L., Dorao C.A. Influence of the plot area in an economical analysis for selecting small scale LNG technologies for remote gas production 2010, 2:302-309.
10. Chakravarty T., Phukan U.K., Weiland R.H. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1985, 81:32-36.
11. Chiang L.H., Kotanchek M.E., Kordon A.K. Fault diagnosis based on Fisher discriminant analysis and Support Vector Machines. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28:1389-1401.
12. Comak E., Arslan A. Anew training method for support vector machines: clusteringk-NN support vector machines. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 35:564-568.
13. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
14. Cristianini N., Shave-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machine (And Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods) 2000, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. UK.
15. Curilem M., Acuña G., Cubillos F., Vyhmeister E. Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine models applied to energy consumption opti-mization in semiautogeneous grinding. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2011, 25:761-766.
16. Dincer K., Tasdemir S., Baskaya S., Uysal B.Z. Modeling of the effects of length to diameter ratio and nozzle number on the performance of counterflow Ranque-Hilsch vortex tubes using artificial neural networks. J.Appl. Therm. Eng. 2008, 28:2380-2390.
17. Ding J., Cao Y., Mpofua E., Shia Z. Ahybrid support vector machine and fuzzy reasoning based fault diagnosis and rescue system for stable glutamate fermentation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012, 90:1197-1207.
18. Eslamimanesh A., Gharagheizi F., Mohammadi A.H., Richon D. Phase equilibrium modeling of structure H clathrate hydrates of methane+water "insoluble" hydrocarbon promoter using QSPR molecular approach. J.Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56:3775-3793.
19. Eslamimanesh A., Gharagheizib F., Illbeigi M., Mohammadi A.H., Fazlali A., Richon D. Phase equilibrium modeling of clathrate hydrates of methane, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and hydrogen+water soluble organic promoters using support vector machine algorithm. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2012, 316:34-45.
20. Fidler B.R., Sublette K.L., Jenneman G.E., Bala G.A. ANovel Approach to Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Natural Gas 2003, 81203. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
21. Fortuny M., Baeza J.A., Gamisans X., Casas C., Lafuente J., Deshusses M.A., Gabriel D. Biological sweetening of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters. J.Chemosphere 2008, 71:10-17.
22. Fouad W.A., Berrouk A.S. Using mixed tertiary amines for gas sweetening energy requirement reduction. J.Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2013, 11:12-17.
23. Haghbakhsh R., Adib H., Keshavarz P., Koolivand M., Keshtkari S. Development of an artificial neural network model for the prediction of hydrocarbon density at high-pressure, high-temperature conditions. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 551:124-130.
24. Hearst M.A., Dumais S.T., Osman E., Platt J., Schölkopf B. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell. Syst. 1998, 13:18-28.
25. Hwang J.P., Park S., Kim E. Anew weighted approach to imbalanced data classification problem via support vector machine with quadratic cost function. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:8580-8585.
26. Klein J.P. Oil Gas Int. 1970, 10:109-112.
27. Koolivand Salooki M., Abedini R., Adib H., Koolivand H. Design of neural network for manipulating gas refinery sweetening regenerator column outputs. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 82:1-9.
28. Kulkarni A., Jayaraman V.K., Kulkarni B.D. Knowledge incorporated support vector machines to detect faults in Tennessee Eastman Process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2005, 29:2128-2133.
29. Kuo J.C., Wang K.H., Chen C. Pros and cons of different Nitrogen Removal Unit (NRU) technology. J.Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2012, 7:52-59.
30. Li D.C., Fang Y.H. An algorithm to cluster data for efficient classification of support vector machines. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34:2013-2018.
31. 2 in aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine and diethanolamine with 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2004, 218:261-267.
32. Maddox R.N., Diers j., Bhairi A.M., Thomas-Cooper P.A., Elizondo E.M. Plant Oper. Prog. 1987, 6:112-117.
33. Mehdizadeh B., Movagharnejad K. Acomparative study between LS-SVM method and semi empirical equations for modeling the solubility of different solutes in supercritical carbon dioxide. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89:2420-2427.
34. Mohebi S., Mousavi S.M., Kiani S. Modeling and simulation of sour gas membrane-absorption system: influence of operational parameters on species removal. J.Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2009, 1:195-204.
35. Oyarzun P., Arancibia F., Canales C., Aroca G.E. Biofiltration of high concentration of hydrogen sulphide using Thiobacillus thioparus. Process Biochem. 2003, 39:165-170.
36. Pelckmans K., Suykens J.A.K., Van Gestel T., De Brabanter D., Lukas L., Hamers B., De Moor B., Vandewalle J. LS-SVMlab: a Matlab/C Toolbox for Least Squares Support Vector Machines 2002, Leu-ven. Leuven. Belgium.
37. Peng X. TPMSVM: a novel twin parametric-margin support vector machine for pattern recognition. Pattern Recog. Lett. 2011, 44:2678-2692.
38. Polasek J.C., Iglesias-Silva G.A. Using Mixed Amine Solutions for Gas Sweetening 2006, 1-12. Bryan Research and Engineering Inc., Technical Paper.
39. Pontil M., Verri A. Properties of support vector machines. Neural Comput. 1998, 10:955-974.
40. Seo D.J., Hong W.H. J.Chem. Eng. Data 1996, 41:258-260.
41. Seqatoleslami N., KoolivandSalooki M., Mohamadi N. Aneural network for the gas sweetening absorption column using genetic algorithm. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2011, 29:1437-1448.
42. 2 absorption data in a packed column. J.Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2011, 3:518-529.
43. Strack R., Kecman V., Strack B., Li Q. Sphere Support Vector Machines for large classification tasks. Neurocomputing 2013, 101:59-67.
44. Suykens J.A.K., Vandewalle J. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 1999, 9:293-300.
45. Suykens J.A.K., Gestel T.V., Brabanter J.D., Moor B.D., Vandewalle J. Least Squares Support Vector Machines 2002, World Scientific, Singapore.
46. Ter Maat H., Hogendoornb J.A., Versteeg G.F. The removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using an aqueous metal sulfate absorbent part I, the absorption of hydrogen sulfide in metal sulfate solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 43:183-197.
47. Terzica J., Nagarajahb C.R., Alamgira M. Fluid level measurement in dynamic environments using a single ultrasonic sensor and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Sensor Actuator 2010, 161:278-287.
48. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995, Springer-Verlag, New York.
49. Vapnik V.N. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley, New York.
50. Wang X., Chen J., Liu C., Pan F. Hybrid modeling of penicillin fermentation process based on least square support vector machine. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2010, 88:415-420.
51. Yao H.M., Vuthaluru H.B., Tade M.O., Djukanovic D. Artificial neural network based prediction of hydrogen content of coal in power station boilers. Fuel 2005, 84:1535-1542.
52. Yélamosa I., Escuderob G., Graells M., Puigjaner L. Performance assessment of a novel fault diagnosis system based on support vector machines. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33:244-255.
53. Yu Jie ABayesian inference based two-stage support vector regression framework for soft sensor development in batch bioprocesses. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 41:134-144.
54. Zanghirati G., Zanni L. Aparallel solver for large quadratic programs in training support vector machines. Parallel Comput. 2003, 29:535-551.
55. Zhao B. Modeling pressure drop coefficient for cyclone separators: a support vector machine approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:4131-4136.
56. Zhao C.Y., Zhang H.X., Zhang X.Y., Liu M.C., Hu Z.D., Fan B.T. Application of support vector machine (SVM) for prediction toxic activity of different data sets. Toxicology 2006, 217:105-119.