Sparkling wine choice from supermarket shelves: The impact of certification of origin and production practices

Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 44, Issue 4-5, 2013, Pages 523-536

  Thiene, Mara ^a   Scarpa, Riccardo ^b,c   Galletto, Luigi ^a   Boatto, Vasco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Attribute nonattendance; Consumer preferences; Latent class models; RP and SP choice data

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS; CERTIFICATION; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DATABASE; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD MARKET; FOOD PRODUCTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR;

ITALY;

EID: 84880173570     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/agec.12036     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., Williams, M., 1994. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 26(3), 271-292.
2. Alfnes, F., 2004. Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: Application of a mixed logit model. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 31, 19-37.
3. Ali, H.H., Nauges, C., 2007. The pricing of experience goods: The example of en primeur wine. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89, 91-103.
4. Angulo, A.M., Gil, J.M., Gracia, A., Sànchez, M., 2000. Hedonic prices for Spanish red quality wine. Brit. Food J. 102(7), 481-493.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T., 1990. Estimation of switching models from revealed preference and stated intentions. Transport. Res. Part A 24, 485-495.
6. Benfratello, L., Piacenza, M., Sacchetto, S., 2009. Taste or reputation: What drives market prices in the wine industry? Estimation of a hedonic model for Italian premium wines, Appl. Econ. 41(17), 2197-2209.
7. Bhat, C., Castelar, S., 2001. A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing in the San Francisco bay area. Transport. Res. Part B 36, 577-669.
8. Boatto, V., Barisan L., 2012. Il mercato del Conegliano Valdobbiadene DOCG. C.I.R.V.E. Ambiente e mercato: una sinergia possibile. Consorzio per la Tutela del Conegliano Valdobbiadene, Pieve di Soligo, pp. 43-86.
9. Brooks, K., Lusk, J.L., 2010. Stated and revealed preferences for organic and cloned milk: Combining choice experiment and scanner data. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 92(4), 1229-1241.
10. Cameron, T.A., 1992. Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Econ. 68, 302-317.
11. Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., Lampi, E., 2008. Dealing with ignored attributes in choice experiments on valuation of Swedens environmental quality objectives. Environ. Resour. Econ. 471, 65-89.
12. Cherchi, E., Ortuzar, J. de D., 2011. On the use of mixed RP/SP models in prediction: Accounting for systematic and random taste heterogeneity. Transport. Sci. 45(1), 98-108.
13. Combris, P., Bazoche, P., Giraud-Héraud, E., Issanchou, S., 2009. Food choices: What do we learn from combining sensory and economic experiments? Food Qual. Prefer. 20, 550-557.
14. Costanigro, M., McCluskey, J.J., Goemans, C., 2010. The economics of nested names: Name specificity, reputations, and price premia. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 92(5), 1339-1350.
15. Dias, J., 2006. Latent class analysis and model selection. In: Spiliopoulou, M., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C., Nürnberger, A., Gaul, W. (Eds.), From Data and Information Analysis to Knowledge Engineering, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 95-102.
16. Espino, R., Ortuzar, J. de D., Romàn, C., 2007. Understanding suburban travel demand: Flexible modelling with revealed and stated choice data. Transport. Res. Part A 41, 899-912.
17. Greene, W., Hensher, D., Rose, J., 2006. Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transport. Res. Part B 40, 75-92.
18. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Green, W.H., 2005. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 323, 203-222.
19. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Green, W.H., 2008. Combining RP and SP data: biases in using the nested logit trick - contrasts with flexible mixed logit incorporating panel and scale effects. Journal of Transport Geography 16(2), 126-133.
20. Hensher, D., Bradley, M., 1993. Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models. Market. Lett. 4, 39-152.
21. Hensher, D., Louviere, J., Swait, J., 1999. Combining sources of preference data. J. Econom. 89, 197-221.
22. Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A., Campbell, D., O'Neill, V., Caussade, S., 2013. It's not that I don't care, I just don't care very much: Confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity. Transportation 40(3), 583-607.
23. Hurvich, M., Tsai, C., 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76(2), 297-307.
24. Landon, S., Smith, C.E., 1998. The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: The case of Bordeaux wine. J. Consum. Policy 20, 289-323.
25. Lecocq, S., Visser, M., 2006. What determines wine prices: Objective vs. sensory characteristics. J. Wine Econ. 1, 42-56.
26. Loureiro, M.L., 2003. Rethinking new wines: Implications of local and environmentally friendly labels. Food Policy 28, 547-560.
27. Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., 2000. Assessing consumer response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness 16(3), 309-320.
28. Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., Mittelhamer, R.C., 2003. Are stated preferences good predictors of market behavior? Land Econ. 79, 44-55.
29. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D., 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Menapace, L., Colson, G., Grebitus, C., Facendola, M., 2011. Consumers preferences for geographical origin labels: Evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 38(2), 193-212.
31. Morgan, O.A., Whitehead, J.C., Huth, W., Martin, G., Sjolander, R., 2013. A Split-Sample revealed and stated preference model to examine homogenous subgroup consumer behavior responses to information and food safety technology treatments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 54(4), 593-611.
32. Mtimet, N., Albisu, L.M., 2006. Spanish wine consumer behavior: A choice experiment approach. Agribusiness 22(3), 343-362.
33. Perrouty, J.P., d'Hauteville, F., Lockshin, L., 2006. The influence of wine attributes on region of origin equity: An analysis of the moderating effect of consumers perceived expertise. Agribusiness 22, 323-341.
34. Phaneuf, D.J., Taylor, L.O., Braden, J.B., 2013. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate preferences for residential amenities: A GMM approach. Land Econ. 89(1), 30-52.
35. Resano-Ezcaray, H., Sanjuàn-Lòpez, A.I., Albisu-Aguado, L.M., 2010. Combining stated and revealed preferences on typical food products: The case of dry-cured ham in Spain. J. Agric. Econ. 61(3), 480-498.
36. Roosen, J., Lusk, J.L., Fox, J., 2003. Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labeling strategies in France, Germany, and the UK. Agribusiness 19(1), 77-90.
37. Rose, J., Bliemer, M., Hensher, D., Collins, A., 2008. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in presence of reference alternatives. Transport. Res. Part B, 42, 395-406.
38. Rossetto, L., Boatto, V., Barisan, L., 2011. Strategies and interpreting models of a reformed DOC: The Prosecco case study. Enometrica 4(1), 1-22.
39. Scarpa, R., Philippidis, G., Spalatro, F., 2005. Product-country images and preference heterogeneity for Mediterranean food products: A discrete choice framework. Agribusiness 21, 329-349.
40. Swait, J., Andrews, R.L., 2003. Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Market. Sci. 22(4), 442-460.
41. Swait, J., Louviere, J., 1993. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Market. Res. 30(3), 305-314.
42. Swait, J., Louviere, J.J., Williams, M., 1994. A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: application to freight shipper choice. Transportation 21(2), 135-152.
43. Train, K., Wilson, W., 2008. Estimation on stated preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices. Transport. Res. Part B 42, 191-203.
44. Train, K., Wilson, W., 2009. Monte Carlo analysis of SP-off-RP data. J. Choice Model. 2(1), 101-117.
45. von Haefen, R.F., Phaneuf, D.J., 2008. Identifying demand parameters in the presence of unobservables: A combined revealed and stated preference approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 56, 19-32.
46. Whitehead, J.C., Pattanayak, S.K., Van Houtven, G.L., Gelso, B.R., 2008. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science. J. Econ. Surv. 22(5), 872-908.
47. Whitehead, J.C., Phaneuf, D.J., Dumas, C.F., ·Herstine, J., Hill, J., Buerger, B., 2010. Convergent validity of revealed and stated recreation behavior with quality change: A comparison of multiple and single site demands. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 91-112.
48. Winfree, J.A., McCluskey, J.J., 2005. Collective reputation and quality. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87, 206-213.
49. Yang, C.C., Yang, C.C., 2007. Separating latent classes by information criteria. J. Classif. 24, 183-203.