Convergent validity of revealed and stated recreation behavior with quality change: A comparison of multiple and single site demands

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 91-112

  Whitehead, John C ^a   Phaneuf, Daniel J ^b   Dumas, Christopher F ^c   Herstine, Jim ^c   Hill, Jeffery ^c   Buerger, Bob ^c  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Convergent validity; Recreation demand; Revealed preference; Stated preference; Travel cost method

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTATION;

CONVERGENT VALIDITY; RECREATION DEMAND; REVEALED PREFERENCE; STATED PREFERENCES; TRAVEL COST METHOD;

BEACHES;

CONVERGENCE; DEMAND ANALYSIS; MODEL VALIDATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TRAVEL DEMAND; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 77949422810     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9307-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AAA (2005) Personal communication. American Automobile Association, Heathrow.
2. Azevedo CD, Herriges JA, Kling CL (2003) Combining revealed and stated preferences: consistency tests and their interpretations. Am J Agric Econ 85: 525-537.
3. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Carson RT, Hanemann WM (2002) Contingent valuation. In: Mäler KG, Vincent JR (eds) Chapter 17 in handbook of environmental economics: vol 2 valuing environmental changes, Elsevier North-Holland.
5. Carson RT, Flores NE, Martin KM, Wright JL (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preferences methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Econ 72: 80-99.
6. Egan K, Herriges JA (2006) Multivariate count data regression models with individual panel data from an on-site sample. J Environ Econ Manag 52: 567-581.
7. Eiswerth ME, Englin J, Fadali E, Shaw WD (2000) The value of water levels in water-based recreation: a pooled revealed preference/contingent behavior model. Water Resour Res 36: 1079-1086.
8. Englin J, Cameron TA (1996) Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environ Resour Econ 7: 133-147.
9. Freeman AM (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values. Resources for the Future Press, Washington D. C.
10. Grijalva T, Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Shaw WD (2002) Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. Am J Agric Econ 84(2): 401-414.
11. Haab TC, McConnell KE (2002) Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non- market valuation. Edward Elgar, Northampton.
12. Hellerstein D, Woo D, McCollum D, Donnelly D (1993) ZIPFIP: a Zip and FIPS database. US Department of Agriculture, ERS-RTD, Washington DC.
13. Herstine J, Hill J, Buerger B, Whitehead J, Isom C (2005) Determination of recreation demand for federal shore protection study area: overview and methodology. Final Report Prepared for The US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District.
14. Jeon Y, Herriges JA (2005) Convergent validity of contingent behavior responses in models of recreation demand. Working Paper #05031, Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Iowa State University.
15. Larson D (2001) Recovering weakly complementary preferences. J Environ Econ Manag 21(2): 97-108.
16. Layman RC, Boyce JR, Criddle KR (1996) Economic valuation of chinook salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternate management plans. Land Econ 72: 113-128.
17. List JA, Gallet CA (2001) What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Environ Resour Econ 20: 241-254.
18. Little J, Berrens R (2004) Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis. Econ Bull 3(6): 1-13.
19. Parsons GR (2003) The travel cost model. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, London.
20. Parsons GR, Jakus PM, Tomasi T (1999) A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice. J Environ Econ Manag 38: 143-157.
21. Phaneuf DJ, Smith VK (2005) Recreation demand models. In: Mäler KG, Vincent JR (eds) Chapter 15 in handbook of environmental economics: vol 2 valuing environmental changes, Elsevier North-Holland.
22. Phaneuf DJ, Siderelis C (2003) An application of the Kuhn-Tucker demand model to the demand for water trail trips in North Carolina. Mar Resour Econ 18: 1-14.
23. Phaneuf DJ, Kling CL, Herriges JA (2000) Estimation and welfare calculations in a generalized corner solution model with an application to recreation demand. Rev Econ Stat 82: 83-92.
24. von Haefen RH (2002) A complete characterization of the linear, log-linear, and semi-log incomeplete demand system models. J Agric Resour Econ 27: 281-319.
25. von Haefen RH (2003) Incorporating observed choice into the construction of welfare measures from random utility models. J Environ Econ Manag 45: 145-165.
26. von Haefen RH (2007) Empirical strategies for incorporating weak complementarity into consumer demand models. J Environ Econ Manag 54: 15-31.
27. von Haefen RH, Phaneuf DJ (2005) Kuhn-Tucker demand system approaches to non-market valuation. In: Alberini A, Scarpa R (eds) Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics, Springer.
28. von Haefen RH, Phaneuf DJ, Parsons GR (2004) Estimation and welfare calculation with large demand systems. J Bus Econ Stat 22: 194-205.
29. Whitehead JC (2005) Environmental risk and averting behavior: predictive validity of revealed and stated preference data. Environ Resour Econ 32: 301-316.
30. Whitehead JC, Haab TC, Huang JC (2000) Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resour Energy Econ 22: 339-354.
31. Whitehead JC, Pattanayak SK, van Houtven GL, Gelso BR (2008) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J Econ Surv 22: 872-908.
32. Willig R (1978) Incremental consumer's surplus and hedonic price adjustment. J Econ Theory 17(2): 227-252.