Hydrocarbon divergence and reproductive isolation in Timema stick Insects

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Schwander, Tanja ^a,b   Arbuthnott, Devin ^c   Gries, Regine ^d   Gries, Gerhard ^d   Nosil, Patrik ^e   Crespi, Bernard J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HYDROCARBON; INSECT; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; MATE CHOICE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

HEXAPODA; PHASMATODEA; TIMEMA; TIMEMA CRISTINAE;

HYDROCARBON;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INSECT; MALE; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; INSECTS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84880119621     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-151     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Andersson M, Sexual selection Princeton: Princeton University Press 1994
2. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T, Anim Behav 2000 60 145 164 10.1006/anbe.2000. 1446 10973716
3. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: Inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Shaw KL, Evolution 2000 54 1303 1312 11005297
4. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms. Gerhardt HC, Anim Behav 2005 70 39 48 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.021 (Pubitemid 40837208)
5. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Blows MW, Proc R Soc Lond B 2002 269 1113 1118 10.1098/rspb.2002.2002 (Pubitemid 34628254)
6. Sexual selection and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Boake CRB, Behav Genet 2005 35 297 303 10.1007/s10519-005-3221-4 15864444 (Pubitemid 40616474)
7. Eberhard WG, Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1985
8. The tempo and mode of three-dimensional morphological evolution in male reproductive structures. McPeek MA, Shen L, Torrey JZ, Farid H, Am Nat 2008 171 158 E178 10.1086/587076 18419524 (Pubitemid 351589838)
9. Theory and speciation. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA, Trends Ecol Evol 2001 16 330 343 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02177-2 11403865 (Pubitemid 32525773)
10. Flying apart: Mating behavior and speciation. Boake CRB, BioScience 2000 50 501 508 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0501:FAMBAS]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 30334475)
11. Coyne JA, Orr HA, Speciation Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 2004
12. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Edward DA, Chapman T, Trends Ecol Evol 2011 26 647 654 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.012 21890230
13. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Maan ME, Seehausen O, Ecol Lett 2011 14 591 602 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01606.x 21375683
14. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Blows MW, Allan RA, Am Nat 1998 152 826 837 10.1086/286211 18811430 (Pubitemid 28542301)
15. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Butlin RK, Speciation and Its Consequences Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, Otte D, Endler JA, 1989 158 179
16. Natural-selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Lande R, Evolution 1976 30 314 334 10.2307/2407703
17. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. Lynch M, Am Nat 1990 136 727 741 10.1086/285128
18. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: Reinforcement or direct selection? Albert AYK, Schluter D, Evolution 2004 58 1099 1107 15212390 (Pubitemid 38673797)
19. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in Cranes (Gruinae). Mooers AO, Vamosi SM, Schluter D, Am Nat 1999 154 249 259 10.1086/303226 (Pubitemid 29427394)
20. Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Butlin RK, Hewitt GM, Webb SF, Anim Behav 1985 33 1281 1292 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80188-3
21. Does sexual selection account for the conspicuous head dimorphism in the Midas cichlid? Barlow GW, Siri P, Anim Behav 1997 53 573 584 10.1006/anbe.1996.0332 (Pubitemid 27200963)
22. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Gavrilets S, Nature 2000 403 886 889 10.1038/35002564 10706284 (Pubitemid 30130988)
23. The evolution of female mating preferences: Differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. McPeek MA, Gavrilets S, Evolution 2006 60 1967 1980 17133854 (Pubitemid 44808208)
24. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, Nature 2002 415 787 789 10.1038/415787a 11845208 (Pubitemid 34150499)
25. The macroevolutionary consequences of ecological differences among species. McPeek MA, Palaeontology 2007 50 111 129 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006. 00616.x (Pubitemid 46061026)
26. Van der Meer RK, Breed MD, Espelie KE, Winston M, Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites Boulder, CO: Westview 1998
27. Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Ferveur JF, Behav Genet 2005 35 279 295 10.1007/s10519-005-3220-5 15864443 (Pubitemid 40616473)
28. Identification of the sex pheromone of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Nojima S, Schal C, Webster FX, Santangelo RG, Roelofs WL, Science 2005 307 1104 1106 10.1126/science.1107163 15718472 (Pubitemid 40262115)
29. Ecological, behavioral, andbiochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ, Annu Rev Entomol 2005 50 371 393 10.1146/annurev.ento. 50.071803.130359 15355247
30. Courtship and mate discrimination within and between species of Timema walking-sticks. Arbuthnott D, Crespi BJ, Anim Behav 2009 78 53 59 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.028
31. Revision of Timema Scudder (Phasmatoptera, Timematodea) including 3 new species. Vickery VR, Can Entomol 1993 125 657 692 10.4039/Ent125657-4
32. Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Nosil P, Proc R Soc Lond B 2004 271 1521 1528 10.1098/rspb.2004.2751 (Pubitemid 38943081)
33. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP, Nature 2002 417 440 443 10.1038/417440a 12024213 (Pubitemid 34563535)
34. Divergent host plant adaptation and reproductive isolation between ecotypes of Timema cristinae walking sticks. Nosil P, Am Nat 2007 169 151 162 10.1086/510634 17211800 (Pubitemid 46184970)
35. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP, Proc R Soc Lond B 2003 270 1911 1918 10.1098/rspb.2003.2457 (Pubitemid 37222613)
36. Aitchison J, The statistical analysis of compositional data London -New York: Chapman and Hall 12 1986
37. Multiple direct transitions from sexual reproduction to apomictic parthenogenesis in Timema stick insects. Schwander T, Crespi BJ, Evolution 2009 63 84 103 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00524.x 18803687
38. The evolution of geographic parthenogenesis in Timema walking-sticks. Law JH, Crespi BJ, Mol Ecol 2002 11 1471 1489 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01547.x 12144667
39. Molecular evidence for ancient asexuality in Timema stick insects. Schwander T, Henry L, Crespi BJ, Curr Biol 2011 21 1129 1134 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.026 21683598
40. Transitions in cuticular composition across a hybrid zone: historical accident or environmental adaptation? Buckley SH, Tregenza T, Butlin RK, Biol J Linn Soc 2003 78 193 201 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00147.x (Pubitemid 36453441)
41. Epicuticular hydrocarbon composition of wild and laboratory-reared Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow (Diptera Drosophilidae). Toolson EC, Markow TA, Jackson LL, Howard RW, Ann Entomol Soc Am 1990 83 1165 1176
42. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VII. Effects of larval dietary fatty acids on adult epicuticular hydrocarbons. Etges WJ, Veenstra CL, Jackson LL, J Chem Ecol 2006 32 2629 2646 10.1007/s10886-006-9187-8 17131188 (Pubitemid 44912426)
43. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis: II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and G x E interactions. Etges WJ, De Oliveira CC, Ritchie MG, Noor MAF, Evolution 2009 63 1712 1730 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00661.x 19228188
44. Divergent host plant adaptation drives the evolution of sexual isolation in the grasshopper Hesperotettix viridis (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the absence of reinforcement. Grace T, Wisely SM, Brown SJ, Dowell FE, Joern A, Biol J Linn Soc 2010 100 866 878 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01458.x
45. Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Thomas ML, Simmons LW, BMC Evol Biol 2009 9 162 10.1186/1471-2148-9-162 19594896
46. Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles. Everaerts C, Farine JP, Cobb M, Ferveur JF, PLoS One 2010 5 9607 10.1371/journal.pone.0009607 20231905
47. Evolution of insect pheromones and their role in reproductive isolation and speciation. Wicker-Thomas C, Ann Soc Entomol Fr 2011 47 55 62 10.1080/00379271.2011.10697696
48. Patterns of trait divergence between populations of the meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. Tregenza T, Pritchard VL, Butlin RK, Evolution 2000 54 574 585 10937234 (Pubitemid 30263932)
49. Profiles of cuticular hydrocarbons mediate male mate choice and sexual isolation between hybridising Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Peterson MA, Dobler S, Larson EL, Juarez D, Schlarbaum T, Monsen KJ, Francke W, Chemoecology 2007 17 87 96 10.1007/s00049-007-0366-z (Pubitemid 46800790)
50. Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Alves H, Rouault JD, Kondoh Y, Nakano Y, Yamamoto D, Kim YK, Jallon JM, Behav Genet 2010 40 694 705 10.1007/s10519-010-9364-y 20480222
51. Incipient speciation in Drosophila melanogaster involves chemical signals. Grillet M, Everaerts C, Houot B, Ritchie MG, Cobb M, Ferveur JF, Sci Rep 2012 2 224 22355738
52. Divergent patterns of diversification in courtship and genitalic characters of Timema walking-sticks. Arbuthnott D, Elliot MG, McPeek MA, Crespi BJ, J Evol Biol 2010 23 1399 1411 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02000.x 20456561
53. Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala). Mullen SP, Mendelson TC, Schal C, Shaw KL, Evolution 2007 61 223 231 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00019.x 17300441 (Pubitemid 46417356)
54. Variations on a theme: diversification of cuticular hydrocarbons in a clade of cactophilic Drosophila. De Oliveira CC, Manfrin MH, Sene FD, Jackson LL, Etges WJ, BMC Evol Biol 2011 11 179 10.1186/1471-2148-11-179 21699713
55. Counteracting selective regimes and host preference evolution in ecotypes of two species of walking-sticks. Sandoval CP, Nosil P, Evolution 2005 59 2405 2413 16396181 (Pubitemid 41752653)
56. Ecological niche dimensionality and the evolutionary diversification of stick insects. Nosil P, Sandoval CP, PLoS One 2008 4 1907
57. Adaptive evolution of cryptic coloration: the shape of host plants and dorsal stripes in Timema walking-sticks. Sandoval CP, Crespi BJ, Biol J Linn Soc 2008 94 1 5 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00941.x (Pubitemid 351629730)
58. Genomic consequences of multiple speciation processes in a stick insect. Nosil P, Gompert Z, Farkas TE, Comeault AA, Feder JL, Buerkle CA, Parchman TL, Proc R Soc Lond B 2012 279 5058 5065 10.1098/rspb.2012.0813
59. Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females. Gleason JM, James RA, Wicker-Thomas C, Ritchie MG, Heredity 2009 103 416 424 10.1038/hdy.2009.79 19654611
60. Rapid evolution of sex pheromone-producing enzyme expression in Drosophila. Shirangi TR, Dufour HD, Williams TM, Carroll SB, PLoS Biol 2009 7 1000168 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000168 19652700
61. Signatures of selection and sex-specific expression variation of a novel duplicate during the evolution of the Drosophila desaturase gene family. Keays MC, Barker D, Wicker-Thomas C, Ritchie MG, Mol Ecol 2011 20 3617 3630 21801259
62. Molecular phylogenetics of sexual and parthenogenetic Timema walking-sticks. Sandoval CP, Carmean DA, Crespi BJ, Proc R Soc Lond B 1998 265 589 595 10.1098/rspb.1998.0335 (Pubitemid 28162255)
63. Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Hey J, Evolution 1992 46 627 640 10.2307/2409633
64. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Harvey PH, Purvis A, Nature 1991 351 619 624 10.1038/351619a0 2052088 (Pubitemid 21896649)
65. Temperature-programmed gas chromatography linear retention indices of all C-4-C-30 monomethylalkanes on methylsilicone OV-1 stationary phase-Contribution towards a better understanding of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath. Krkosova Ž Kubinec R, Soják L, Amann A, J Chromatogr A 2008 1179 59 68 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.081 18021789 (Pubitemid 350309605)
66. Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility. Holman L, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, D'Ettorre P, Proc R Soc Lond B 2010 277 3793 3800 10.1098/rspb.2010.0984
67. Biological activity of synthetic hydrocarbon mixtures of cuticular components of the female housefly (Musca domestica L.). Lafrance D, Shani A, Margalit J, J Chem Ecol 1989 15 1475 1490 10.1007/BF01012377
68. Mate recognition in the two-spot ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata: role of chemical and behavioural cues. Hemptinne JL, Lognay G, Dixon AFG, J Insect Physiol 1998 44 1163 1171 10.1016/S0022-1910(98)00081-X 12770316 (Pubitemid 28553434)
69. Über Naturwachse IV.: Über einen neuen Typ verzweigter Paraffine aus dem Wachs der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.). Stransky K, Streibl M, Sorm F, Collect Czechoslov Chem Commun 1966 31 4694 4702 10.1135/cccc19664694
70. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF, Doughty P, Blows MW, PLoS Biol 2005 3 1988 1995 (Pubitemid 41652451)
71. Legendre L, Legendre P, La structure des données écologiques, vol. 2, 2 edn. Paris et les Presses de l'Université du Québec: Masson 1984
72. Kindt R, Coe R, Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) 2005
73. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. Danielson-Francois AM, Kelly JK, Greenfield MD, J Evol Biol 2006 19 532 542 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01006.x 16599929
74. Sexual selection in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: no good genes? Rodriguez-Munoz R, Bretman A, Hadfield JD, Tregenza T, Genetica 2008 134 129 136 10.1007/s10709-008-9250-1 18327649
75. Vegan, Community Ecology Package R package version 1.17-4 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
76. CoMET: A Mesquite package for comparing models of continuous character evolution on phylogenies. Lee CH, Blay S, Mooers AO, Singh A, Oakley TH, Evol Bioinforma 2006 2 183 186
77. Maddison WP, Maddison DR, Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis 2011 Version 2.01 http://mesquiteproject.org
78. Burnham K, Anderson D, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach New York: Springer 2002
79. Swofford DL, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods 4.0b10 Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc 2000
80. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Posada D, Mol Biol Evol 2008 25 1253 1256 10.1093/molbev/msn083 18397919 (Pubitemid 351882013)
81. Felsenstein J, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Washington 1993
82. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Bioinformatics 2003 19 1572 1574 10.1093/bioinformatics/ btg180 12912839 (Pubitemid 37038874)
83. Differential visual predation on morphs of Timema cristinae (Phasmatodeae, Timemidae) and its consequences for host-range. Sandoval CP, Biol J Linn Soc 1994 52 341 356 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1994.tb00996.x (Pubitemid 2122394)
84. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Evolution 2004 58 102 112 15058723 (Pubitemid 38355641)