Form effects on dibels next oral reading fluency progress-monitoring passages

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 91-104

  Cummings, Kelli D ^a   Park, Yonghan ^b   Schaper, Holle A Bauer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b Gangneung Wonju National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Achievement assessment; Curriculum based measurement; Measurement theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880099518     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534508412447010     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aday, L. A., & Cornelius, L. J. (2006). Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Albano, A. D., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2011). Statistical equating with measures of oral reading fluency. Journal of School Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.002
3. Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2009). CBM of oral reading: Standard errors associated with progress monitoring outcomes from DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an experimental passage set. School Psychology Review, 38, 266-283.
4. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(1), 1-22.
5. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J., Kame'enui, E. Carrie, T. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low performing high poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37.
6. Betts, J., Pickart, M., & Heistad, D. (2009). An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating for alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology, 47(1), 1-17. doi:10.1016/j. jsp.2008.09.001
7. Capizzi, A. M., & Barton-Arwood, S. M. (2009). Using a CBM graphic organizer to facilitate collaboration in reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 14-23.
8. Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M., & Mendoza, K. (2008). Floor effects in universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163-176.
9. Chaparro, E. A., Park, Y., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Stoolmiller, M., Smith, J. M., & Basaraba, D. (2012). Evaluating equating methods for progress monitoring ORF passages in second grade. Manuscript in preparation.
10. Christ, T. J., & Ardoin, S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55-75.
11. Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: The standard error of measurement. School Psychology Review, 36, 130-146.
12. Cummings, K. D., Atkins, T., Allison, R., & Cole, C. (2008). Response to Intervention: Investigating the new role of special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(4), 24-31.
13. Cummings, K. D., Bousselot, T., Smith, J. M., Brown, M., Kennedy, P. C., Baker, S. K., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). Sentinel schools in the DIBELS Data System (2010-2011): A description of methods (Tech. Rep. No. 1103). Eugene: University of Oregon.
14. Cummings, K. D., Kennedy, P. C., Otterstedt, J., Baker, S. K., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). DIBELS Data System: 2010-2011 percentile ranks (Tech. Rep. No. 1101). Eugene: University of Oregon. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/techreports/
15. Cummings, K. D., Otterstedt, J., Kennedy, P. C., Baker, S. K., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). DIBELS Data System: 2009-2010 percentile ranks (Tech. Rep. No. 1102). Eugene: University of Oregon. Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/techreports/
16. Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17. Deno, S. L. (1985). CBM: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
18. Francis, D. J., Santi, K. L., Barr, C., Fletcher, J. M., Varisco, A., & Foorman, B. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students' ORF using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315-342.
19. Fuchs, L. (1986). Monitoring progress among mildly handicapped pupils: Review of current practice and research. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 5-12.
20. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15-24.
21. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2003). Can diagnostic reading assessment enhance general educators instructional differentiation and student learning? In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties (pp. 325-351). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
22. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Tech. Rep. No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon. Retrieved from: https://dibels.uoregon.edu/techreports/
23. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011a). DIBELS Next assessment manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group. Available from https://dibels.org/
24. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011b). DIBELS Next technical manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group. Retrieved from https://dibels.org/next/ index.php
25. Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., & Dill, S. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), DIBELS (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
26. Graney, S. B., & Shinn, M. R. (2005). Effects of R-CBM teacher feedback in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 34, 184-202.
27. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (2007). Stanford Achievement Test-10 (10th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
28. Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87.
29. Hixson, M. D., Christ, T. J., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (2008). Best practices in the analysis of progress monitoring data and decision making. In J. Grimes & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-V (pp. 2133-2146). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
30. Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Standard reading assessment passages for use in general outcomes measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
31. Kaminski, R. A., & Cummings, K. D. (2007). Assessment for learning: Using general outcomes measures. Threshold, 2007, 26-28.
32. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
33. Kranzler, J., Brownell, M., & Miller, M. (1998). The construct validity of R-CBM: An empirical test of a plausible rival hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 399-415.
34. Marston, D. B. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What it is and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
36. Moses, T. (2009). A comparison of statistical significance tests for selecting equating functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 285-306.
37. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Common core of data: Public elementary/secondary school universe Survey 2009-10 (Version 1a) [Data file and documentation]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
38. National Center for Response to Intervention [NCRTI] (n. d.). Progress Monitoring Tools. Retrieved from http://www.rti4 success.org/ progressMonitoringTools/
39. O'Connell, A. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Multilevel modeling of educational data. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
40. Petscher, Y., & Kim, Y.-S. (2011). The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 107-129.
41. Petscher, Y., Kim, Y.-S., & Foorman, B. R. (2011). The importance of predictive power in early screening assessments: Implications for placement in the response to intervention framework. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 158-166.
42. Powell-Smith, K. A., Good, R. H., & Atkins, T. (2010). DIBELS Next ORF Readability Study (Tech. Rep. No. 7). Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.
43. Shinn, M. R. (1989). CBM: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford.
44. Shinn, M. R., Gleason, M. M., & Tindal, G. (1989). Varying the difficulty of testing materials: Implications for CBM. Journal of Special Education, 23, 223-233.
45. Stoolmiller, M. (2008). Multilevel models for ORF in the DDS: Variation by state, district, school, and student (Tech. Rep. No. 0801). Eugene: University of Oregon.
46. Stoolmiller, M., Biancarosa, G., & Fien, H. (2012). The measurement properties of DIBELS ORF in grade 2: Implications for equating studies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Taylor, J., Roehrig, A. D., Hensler, B. S., Connor, C. M., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512-514.
48. Wesson, C. L., Vierthaler, J. M., & Haubrich, P. A. (1989). An efficient technique for establishing reading groups. Reading Teacher, 42, 466-469.