Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 315-342

  Francis, David J ^a   Santi, Kristi L ^b   Barr, Christopher ^a   Fletcher, Jack M ^a   Varisco, Al ^c   Foorman, Barbara R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b Santi Group LLC   (United States)

^c St Claire of Assisi Catholic School   (United States)

^d FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CBM; Equipercentile equating; Fluency; Individual growth rates; Oral reading fluency; Progress monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; READING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; TEACHING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; READING; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 41149126622     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Angoff W.H. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores (1967), Educational Testing Service, Princeton
2. Ardoin S.P., Suldo S.M., Witt J., Aldrich S., and McDonald E. Accuracy of readability of estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly 20 1 (2005) 1-22
3. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57 (1995) 289-300
4. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25 (2000) 60-83
5. Blommers P.J., and Forsyth R.A. Elementary statistical methods in psychology and education. 2nd ed. (1977), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
6. Bollen K.A. Structural equation modeling with latent variables (1989), Wiley, New York
7. Bryk A.S., and Raudenbush S.W. Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin 101 (1987) 147-158
8. Burchinal M., and Applebaum M.I. Estimating individual developmental functions: Methods and their assumptions. Child Development 62 (1991) 23-43
9. Deno S.L. Formative evaluation of individual programs: A new role for school psychologist. School Psychology Review 15 (1986) 358-374
10. Foorman B.R., Fletcher J.M., and Francis D.J. TPRI: Early Reading Assessment (2004), McGraw Hill, New York
11. Francis D.J., Fletcher J.M., Stuebing K.K., Davidson K.C., and Thompson N.R. Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (1991) 27-37
12. Francis D.J., Shaywitz S.E., Stuebing K.K., Shaywitz B.A., and Fletcher J.M. Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 1 (1996) 151-170
13. Fuchs L.S., and Deno S.L. Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children 57 (1991) 488-500
14. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D.F., Hosp M.K., and Jenkins J.R. Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 (2001) 239-256
15. Good R.H., and Kaminski R.A. Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (2000-2003). Retrieved October, 2002 from (2002). http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
16. Good R.H., and Kaminski R.A. DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (technical report no. 10) (2002), University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
17. Kolen M.J., and Brennan R.L. Test equating methods and practices (1995), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
18. La Berge D., and Samuels S.J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974) 293-323
19. Laird N.M., and Ware J.H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38 (1982) 963-974
20. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., and Wolfinger R.D. SAS systems for mixed models (1996), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
21. Marston D.B. Curriculum based measurement. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guilford Press, New York 18-78
22. Mehta P.D., and Neale M.C. People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods 10 3 (2005) 259-284
23. Mehta P.D., Neale M.C., and Flay B.R. Squeezing interval change from ordinal panel data: Latent growth curves with ordinal outcomes. Psychological Methods 9 3 (2004) 301-333
24. Nathan R.G., and Stanovich K.E. The causes and consequences of difference in reading fluency. Theory into Practice 30 (1991) 76-184
25. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (2000), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Washington, D.C.
26. Perfetti C.A. Reading ability (1985), Oxford University Press, New York
27. Rogosa D.R., Brandt D., and Zimowski M. A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin 90 (1982) 726-748
28. Rogosa D.R., and Willet J.B. Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika 50 (1985) 203-228
29. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guilford Press, New York
30. Shinn M.R., Rosenfield S., and Knutson N. Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison and integration of models. School Psychology Review 18 (1989) 299-316
31. In: Snow C.E., Burns M.S., and Griffin P. (Eds). Preventing reading difficulties in young children (1998), National Academy Press, Washington, D C
32. Willett J.B. Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In: Rothkopf E.Z. (Ed). Review of research in education Vfol. 15 (1987) 345-422
33. Young A., and Bowers P.G. Individual difference and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 60 (1995) 428-454