Phylogenetic and functional diversity area relationships in two temperate forests

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 883-893

  Wang, Xugao ^a   Swenson, Nathan G ^b   Wiegand, Thorsten ^c   Wolf, Amy ^d   Howe, Robert ^d   Lin, Fei ^a   Ye, Ji ^a   Yuan, Zuoqiang ^a   Shi, Shuai ^a   Bai, Xuejiao ^a   Xing, Dingliang ^a   Hao, Zhanqing ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ECOLOGY   (China)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; TEMPERATE FOREST;

CHINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880037402     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00011.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baddeley A. and Turner R. 2005. SPATSTAT: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J. Stat. Softw. 12: 1-42.
2. Cadotte M. W. et al. 2009. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One 4: e5695.
3. Cadotte M. W. et al. 2010. Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ecological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett. 13: 96-105.
4. Cadotte M. W. et al. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48: 1079-1087.
5. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2006. Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87: S109-S122.
6. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12: 693-715.
7. Chave J. et al. 2007. The importance of phylogenetic structure in biodiversity studies. - In: Storch D. et al. (eds), Scaling biodiversity. Inst. Editions, Santa Fe, pp. 151-167.
8. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 343-366.
9. Condit R. et al. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of common and rare tropical tree species: a test from large plots in six different forests. Science 288: 1414-1418.
10. Cornelissen J. H. C. et al. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51: 335-380.
11. Faith D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61: 1-10.
12. Flynn D. F. B. et al. 2011. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92: 1573-1581.
13. Hardt R. A. and Swank W. T. 1997. A comparison of structural and compositional characteristics of southern Appalachian young second-growth, maturing second-growth, and old- growth stands. Nat. Areas J. 17: 42-52.
14. Hardy O. J. and Senterre B. 2007. Characterizing the phylo genetic structure of communities by an additive partitioning of phylogenetic diversity. J. Ecol. 95: 493-506.
15. He F. and Legendre P. 2002. Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models. Ecology 83: 1185-1198.
16. Helmus M. R. and Ives A. R. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity area curves. Ecology 93: S31-S43.
17. Hubbell S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
18. Illian J. et al. 2008. Statistical analysis and modeling of spatial point patterns. - Wiley.
19. Kraft N. J. B. et al. 2008. Functional traits and niche based on tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322: 580-582.
20. McGill B. J. 2010. Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 13: 627-642.
21. Morlon H. et al. 2011. Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 14: 141-149.
22. Petchey O. L. and Gaston K. J. 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9: 741-758.
23. Plotkin J. B. et al. 2000. Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. J. Theor. Biol. 207: 81-99.
24. Rosindell J. and Cornell S. J. 2009. Species-area curves, neutral models and long distance dispersal. Ecology 90: 1743-1750.
25. Shen G. et al. 2009. Species-area relationships explained by the joint effects of dispersal limitation and habitat heterogeneity. Ecology 90: 3033-3041.
26. Stoyan D. and Stoyan H. 1994. Fractals, random shapes and point fields: methods of geometrical statistics. - Wiley.
27. Swenson N. G. 2009. Phylogenetic resolution and quantifying the phylogenetic diversity and dispersion of communities. PLoS One 4: e4390.
28. Swenson N. G. 2011. The role of evolutionary processes in producing biodiversity patterns, and the interrelationships between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic biodiversity. Am. J. Bot. 98: 472-480.
29. Swenson N. G. and Enquist B. J. 2009. Opposing assembly mechanisms in a Neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. Ecology 90: 2161-2170.
30. Swenson N. G. et al. 2006. The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87: 2418-2424.
31. Swenson N. G. et al. 2007. The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. Ecology 88: 1770-1780.
32. Swenson N. G. et al. 2012. Phylogenetic and functional alpha and beta diversity in temperate and tropical tree communities. Ecology 93: S112-S125.
33. Tilman D. 2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10854-10861.
34. Tilman D. et al. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1300-1302.
35. Waagepetersen R. P. 2007. An estimating function approach to inference for inhomogeneous Neyman-Scott processes. Biometrics 63: 252-258.
36. Waagepetersen R. and Guan Y. 2009. Two-step estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 71: 685-702.
37. Wang X. et al. 2010. Spatial distributions of species in an old-growth temperate forest, northeastern China. Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1011-1019.
38. Wang X. et al. 2011. Spatial patterns of tree species richness in two temperate forests. J. Ecol. 99: 1382-1393.
39. Wang X. et al. 2012. Local-scale drivers of tree survival in a temperate forest. PLoS One 7: e29469.
40. Webb C. O. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 156: 145-155.
41. Webb C. O. and Donoghue M. J. 2005. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Not. 5: 181-183.
42. Webb C. O. et al. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 475-505.
43. Webb C. O. et al. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 2098-2100.
44. Webster R. and McBratney A. B. 1989. On the Akaike information criterion for choosing models for variograms of soil properties. J. Soil Sci. 40: 493-496.
45. Weiher E. and Keddy P. A. 1995. Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: new questions from old patterns. Oikos 74: 159-164.
46. Weiher E. et al. 1998. Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81: 309-322.
47. Wiegand T. et al. 2007. Species associations in a heterogeneous Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. Am. Nat. 170: 77-95.
48. Wiegand T. et al. 2009. Recruitment in tropical tree species: revealing complex spatial patterns. Am. Nat. 174: E106-E140.
49. Wiegand T. et al. 2012. Testing the independent species' arrangement assertion made by theories of stochastic geometry of biodiversity. Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 3312-3320.
50. Wikstrom N. et al. 2001. Evolution of angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 2211-2220.