School Chemistry: The Need for Transgression

Science and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1757-1773

  Talanquer, Vicente ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879909990     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-011-9392-x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington DC: Oxford University Press.
3. American Chemical Society (ACS). (2000). Chemistry in context: Applying chemistry to society (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw Hill.
4. American Chemical Society (ACS). (2001). Chemistry in the community: ChemCom (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
5. American Chemical Society (ACS). (2010). US chemistry employment and unemployment: Data, implications, and trends. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.
6. American Physical Society (APS). (2011). Unit membership statistics. Washington, DC: American Physical Society.
7. Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 999-1015.
8. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009a). Philosophy of chemistry. In A. Brenner & J. Gayon (Eds.), French studies in the philosophy of science: Contemporary research in France (pp. 165-186). Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009b). The chemists' style of thinking. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 32, 365-378.
10. Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Simon, J. (2008). Chemistry: The impure science. London: Imperial College Press.
11. Bhushan, N., & Rosenfeld, S. (2000). Of minds and molecules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Black, P., & Atkin, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: OECD-Routledge.
13. Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1063-1086.
14. Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 715-729.
15. Claesgens, J., Scalise, K., Wilson, M., & Stacy, A. (2009). Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives of chemists. Science Education, 93, 56-85.
16. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1997). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. New York: Routledge.
17. Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
18. Eastman, C., McCracken, M., & Newstetter, W. (Eds.). (2001). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford: Elsevier.
19. Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Science & Education, 10(6), 581-593.
20. Erduran, S. (2009). Beyond philosophical confusion: Establishing the role of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(1), 5-14.
21. Erduran, S., & Duschl, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary characterizations of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom. Studies in Science Education, 40, 105-138.
22. Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.
23. Erduran, S., & Scerri, E. (2002). The nature of chemical knowledge and chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 7-27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Gabel, D. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
25. Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of "context" in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
26. Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. The Netherlands: Springer.
27. Gilbert, J. K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D., & van Driel, J. (Eds.). (2002). Chemical education: Towards research-based practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Goodwin, W. M. (2009). Scientific understanding and synthetic design. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 60, 271-301.
29. Hammer, D., Russ, R., Mikeska, J., & Scherr, R. (2005). Identifying inquiry and conceptualizing students' abilities. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 138-156). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
30. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (2002). First destination supplements: Combined cohort 1996/97-2001/02. UK.
31. Hoffmann, R. (1993). How should chemists think? Scientific American, 268(2), 66-73.
32. Hoffmann, R. (1995). The same and not the same. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. Hoffmann, R. (2007). What might philosophy of science look like if chemists built it? Synthese, 155, 321-336.
34. Hoffmann, R., & Laszlo, P. (1991). Representation in chemistry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 30(1), 1-16.
35. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: ITEA.
36. Jansen, M., & Schön, J. C. (2006). "Design" in chemical synthesis: An illusion? Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 45, 3406-3412.
37. Jenkins, E. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 265-282.
38. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002). Models and modelling in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 47-68). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. Klein, U. (2005). Technoscience avant la lettre. Perspectives on Science, 13(2), 226-266.
40. Knight, D. (1992). Ideas in chemistry. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41. Kovac, J. (2002). Theoretical and practical reasoning in chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 4, 163-171.
42. Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
43. Lloyd, B. W. (1992). A review of curricular changes in the general chemistry course during the twentieth century. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 633-636.
44. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984-2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496.
45. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
46. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
47. National Research Council (NRC). (2003). Beyond the molecular frontier: Challenges for chemistry and chemical engineering. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
48. National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
49. Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Nurrenbern, S. C., & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 508-511.
51. Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
52. Owen-Jackson, G. (Ed.). (2002). Teaching design and technology in secondary schools: A reader. London: Routledge Falmer.
53. Paneth, F. A. (2003). The epistemological status of the chemical concept of element. Foundations of Chemistry, 5, 113-145.
54. Rudolph, J. L. (2000). Reconsidering the "nature of science" as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 403-419.
55. Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89, 803-821.
56. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90, 468-495.
57. Scerri, E. (2000). Philosophy of chemistry: A new interdisciplinary field? Journal of Chemical Education, 77(4), 522-525.
58. Scerri, E. (2001). The new philosophy of chemistry and its relevance to chemical education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 165-170.
59. Scerri, E. R., & Mclntyre, L. (1997). The case for the philosophy of chemistry. Synthese, 111, 213-232.
60. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882.
61. Schummer, J. (1997a). Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800-1995. Scientometrics, 39, 107-123.
62. Schummer, J. (1997b). Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances. Scientometrics, 39, 125-140.
63. Schummer, J. (1998). The chemical core of chemistry: A conceptual approach. HYLE, 4(2), 129-162.
64. Schummer, J. (2003). The philosophy of chemistry. Endeavour, 27(1), 37-41.
65. Schummer, J. (2010). The philosophy of chemistry. In F. Allhoff (Ed.), Philosophies of the sciences: A guide (pp. 163-183). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
66. Sjöström, J. (2007). The discourse of chemistry (and beyond). HYLE, 13(2), 83-97.
67. Talanquer, V. (2006). Common sense chemistry: A model for understanding students' alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 811-816.
68. Talanquer, V., & Pollard, J. (2010). Let's teach how we think instead of what we know. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 11, 74-83.
69. US Bureau of Labor Statistics (US BLS), US Department of Labor. (2010). Occupational outlook handbook, 2010-11 library edition. Bulletin 2800. Washington DC: Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office.
70. van Berkel, B., de Vos, W., Verdonk, A. H., & Pilot, A. (2000). Normal science education and its dangers: The case of school chemistry. Science & Education, 9, 123-159.
71. van Brakel, J. (2000). The philosophy of chemistry. Louvain: University of Louvain Press.
72. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
73. Yager, R. E. (Ed.). (1996). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
74. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.