Morphological and genetic variation within and among four Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations

Turkish Journal of Botany

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 619-629

  Yücedaǧ, Cengiz ^a   Gailing, Oliver ^b  

^a BARTIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expressed sequence tag; Genetic differentiation; Leaf morphology; Quercus; Simple sequence repeats

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; CHLOROPLAST; DECIDUOUS TREE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REFUGE; WATER AVAILABILITY;

TURKEY;

EID: 84879800739     PISSN: 1300008X     EISSN: 13036106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1205-18     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aas G (1993). Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy. Annals of Forest Science 50: 107-114.
2. Aas G (1998). Morphologische und Ökologische Variation Mitteleuropäischer Quercus-Arten: ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Biodiversität. Eching bei München, Germany: IHW-Verlag.
3. Aldrich PR & Cavender-Bares J (2011). Quercus. In: Kole C (ed.) Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources Forest Trees, pp. 89-129. Springer.
4. Alexandersson E, Danielson JA, Råde J, Moparthi VK, Fontes M, Kjellbom P & Johanson U (2010). Transcriptional regulation of aquaporins in accessions of Arabidopsis in response to drought stress. Plant Journal 61: 650-660.
5. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A & Kremer A (1995). Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France. Silvae Genetica 44: 1-10.
6. Bakker E.G., Van Dam BC, Van Eck HJ & Jacobsen E (2001). A discrimination between Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. based on species-indicative AFLP markers. Forest Genetics 8: 315-322.
7. Bodenes C, Joandet S, Laigret F & Kremer A (1997). Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Heredity 78: 433-444.
8. Borazan A & Babaç MT (2003). Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 40: 233-242.
9. Borovics A (1999). Separability of pedunculate oak and sessile oak aggregate: a contribution to the hybrid and small species estimation. Proceedings of the Forest Research Institute 89: 93-110.
10. Breda N, Cochard H, Dreyer E & Granier A (1993). Field comparison of transpiration, stomatal conductance and vulnerability to cavitation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur under water-stress. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 571-582.
11. Coart E, Lamote V & De Loose M (2002). AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 431-439.
12. Curtu A.L., Gailing O & Finkeldey R (2007a). Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 218.
13. Curtu A.L., Gailing O, Leinemann L & Finkeldey R (2007b). Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biology 9: 116-126.
14. Deguilloux M.F., Dumolin-Lapegue S, Gielly L, Grivet D & Petit RJ (2003). A set of primers for the amplification of chloroplast microsatellites in Quercus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 24-27.
15. Dupouey JL & Badeau V (1993). Morphological variability of oaks (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. pubescens Willd) in northeastern France: preliminary results. Annals of Forest Science 50: 35-40.
16. Durand J, Bodenes C, Chancerel E, Frigerio JM, Vendramin G, Sebastiani F, Buonamici A, Gailing O, Koelewijn HP, Villani F, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Goicoechea PG, Herrán A, Ikaran Z, Cabané C, Ueno S, Alberto F, Dumoulin PY, Guichoux E, Daruvar A, Kremer A & Plomion C (2010). A fast and costeffective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics 11: 570-582.
17. Erinç S (1965). Yaǧi{dotless}ş Müesseriyeti Üzerine bir Deneme ve Yeni bir İndis. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Coǧrafya Enstitüsü, Yayi{dotless}n No. 41 (in Turkish).
18. Finkeldey R (2001). Genetic variation of oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 1. Allelic diversity and differentiation at isozyme gene loci. Forest Genetics 8: 185-195.
19. Gailing O, Wachter H, Heyder J, Schmitt HP & Finkeldey R (2007). Chloroplast DNA analysis in oak stands (Quercus robur L.) in North Rhine-Westphalia with presumably Slavonian origin: is there an association between geographic origin and bud phenology? Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 81: 165-171.
20. Gailing O, Vornam B, Leinemann LL & Finkeldey R (2009). Genetic and genomic approaches to assess adaptive genetic variation in plants: forest trees as a model. Physiologia Plantarum 137: 509-519.
21. Gömöry D (2000). Gene coding for a non-specific NAD dependent dehydrogenase shows a strong differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea. Forest Genetics 7: 167-170.
22. Guo S & Thompson E (1992). Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361-372.
23. Iestwaart JH & Feij AE (1989). A multivariate analysis of introgression between Q. robur and Q. petraea in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 38: 313-325.
24. Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J & Steinkellner H (1998). Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
25. Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, Espinel S, Jensen J, Kleinschmit J, Van Damj B, Ducousso A, Forrest I, Heredia UL, Lowe AJ, Tutkova M, Munro RC, Steinhoff S & Badeau V (2002). Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Science 59: 777-787.
26. Lexer C, Kremer A & Petit RJ (2006). Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 15: 2007-2012.
27. Mariette S, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, König A, Lowe AJ, Van Dam BC, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, Streiff R, Burg K, Groppe K, Munro RC, Tabbener H & Kremer A (2002). Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genetica 51: 72-79.
28. McShea WJ, Healy WM, Devers P, Fearer T, Koch FH, Stauffer D & Waldon J (2007). Forestry matters: decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1717-1728.
29. Muir G & Schlötterer C (2005). Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 14: 549-561.
30. Müller-Starck G, Zanetto A, Kremer A & Herzog S (1996). Inheritance of isoenzymes in sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and offspring from interspecific crosses. Forest Genetics 3: 1-12.
31. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Neophytou C, Aravanopoulos FA, Fink S & Dounavi A (2010). Detecting interspecific and geographic differentiation patterns in two interfertile oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L.) using small sets of microsatellite markers. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 2026-2035.
33. OGM (2006). Orman Varli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}mi{dotless}z. Ankara, Türkiye: TC Çevre ve Orman Bakanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}, OGM Orman İdaresi ve Planlama Dairesi Başkanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless} Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless} (in Turkish).
34. Oran S & Öztürk S (2012). Epiphytic lichen diversity on Quercus cerris and Q. frainetto in the Marmara region (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 36: 175-190.
35. Peakall R & Smouse P (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
36. Petit R, El Mousadik A & Pons O (1998). Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12: 844-855.
37. Petit R, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, van Dam B, Deans D, Espinel S, Fineschi S, Finkeldey R, Glaz I, Goicoechea PG, Jensen JS, König AO, Lowe AJ, Madsen S.F., Mátyás G, Munro RC, Popescu F, Slade D, Tabbener H, de Vries SGM, Ziegenhagen B, de Beaulieu JL & Kremer A (2002). Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 49-74.
38. Petit R.J., Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Müller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palmé A, Martín J.P., Rendell S & Vendramin GG (2003). Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300: 1563-1565.
39. Ponton S, Dupouey JL & Dreyer E (2004). Leaf morphology as species indicator in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. modulation by irradiance and growth flush. Annals of Forest Science 61: 73-80.
40. Raymond M & Rousset F (1995). Genepop (version 1.2): populationgenetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
41. Rizhsky L, Liang HJ, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Dayletova S & Mittler R (2004). When defense pathways collide: the response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiology 134: 1683-1696.
42. Saintagne C, Bodenes C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C & Kremer A (2004). Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20-30.
43. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodenes C, Burg K & Kremer A (2004). Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species (Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl.). Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
44. SPSS Inc. (2002). SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Public.
45. Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, Kremer A, Burg K & Glössl J (1997). Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 1093-1096.
46. Sullivan A, Lind J, McCleary TS, Romero-Severson J & Gailing O (2013). Development and characterization of genomic and gene-based microsatellite markers in North American red oak species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 31: 231-239.
47. Teshome A, Baum BR, Fahrig L, Torrance JK, Arnason TJ & Lambert JD (1997). Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landrace variation and classification in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97: 255-263.
48. Ugurlu E, Rolecek J & Bergmeier E (2012). Oak woodland vegetation of Turkey-a first overview based on multivariate statistics. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 590-608.
49. Van Valen L (1976). Ecological species, multispecies and oaks. Taxon 25: 233-239.
50. Vornam B, Gailing O, Derory J, Plomion C, Kremer A & Finkeldey R (2011). Characterization and natural variation of a dehydrin gene in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Plant Biology 13: 881-887.
51. Yalti{dotless}ri{dotless}k F (1984). Türkiye Meşeleri Teşhis Ki{dotless}lavuzu. İstanbul: Yenilik Basi{dotless}mevi (in Turkish).
52. Zanetto A, Kremer A, Müller-Starck G & Hattemer HH (1996). Inheritance of isozymes in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Journal of Heredity 87: 364-370.