Oak woodland vegetation of Turkey - a first overview based on multivariate statistics

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 590-608

  Uǧurlu, Emin ^a   Roleček, Jan ^b,c   Bergmeier, Erwin ^d  

^a CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anatolia; Gradient analysis; Land use; Phytogeography; Phytosociology; Quercus; Silvopastoralism; Vegetation classification; Vegetation diversity; Wood pasture

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS; QUERCUS CERRIS;

EID: 84866004762     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: 1654109X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2012.01192.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Akman, Y., Barbéro, M. & Quézel, P. 1978-1979. Contribution à l'étude de la végétation forestière d'Anatolie méditerranéenne. Phytocoenologia 5: 1-19, (2): 189-276, (3): 277-346.
2. Atalay, I. 2006. The effects of mountainous areas on biodiversity: a case study from the Northern Anatolian mountains and the Taurus mountains. Grazer Schriften der Geographie und Raumforschung 41: 17-25.
3. Aydi{dotless}n, C.T., Bergmeier, E. & Walentowski, H. 2008. Vegetationskundliche Studien in der Waldlandschaft der Nordwesttürkei. Önel, Cologne, DE.
4. Bauer, E.-M. & Bergmeier, E. 2011. The mountain woodlands of western Crete - plant communities, forest goods, grazing impact and conservation. Phytocoenologia 41: 73-105.
5. Bekat, L. 1987. Barla Daǧi{dotless} (Eǧirdir)'ni{dotless}n vejetasyonu. [The vegetation of Mount Barla (Egirdir).]. Doǧa Türk Botanik Dergisi 11: 270-305.
6. Bergmeier, Ε. & Dimopoulos, P. 2008. Identifying plant communities of thermophilous deciduous forest in Greece: species composition, distribution, ecology and syntaxonomy. Plant Biosystems 142: 228-254.
7. Bergmeier, E., Petermann, J. & Schröder, E. 2010. Geobotanical survey of wood-pasture habitats in Europe: diversity, threats and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2995-3014.
8. Bohn, U. & Neuhäusl, R. (eds.) 2000-2003. Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas/Map of the natural vegetation of Europe. Maßstab/Scale 1: 2 500 000. Teil 1: Erläuterungstext mit CD-ROM/Explanatory Text with CD-ROM. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, DE.
9. Botta-Dukát, Z., Chytrý, M., Hájková, P. & Havlová, M. 2005. Vegetation of lowland wet meadows along a climatic continentality gradient in Central Europe. Preslia 77: 89-111.
10. Brullo, S. & Spampinato, G. 2004. Indagine sintassonomica sulla vegetazione a Quercus calliprinos Webb del Mediterraneo. Colloques Phytosociologiques 28: 539-575.
11. Čarni, A., Košir, P., Karadžić, B., Matevski, V., Redžić, S. & Škvorc, Ž. 2009. Thermophilous deciduous forests in Southeastern Europe. Plant Biosystems 143: 1-13.
12. Chytrý, M. 2001. Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 439-444.
13. Çolak, A. & Rotherham, I. 2006. A review of the forest vegetation of Turkey: its status past and present and its future conservation. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 106: 343-354.
14. Davis, P.H. 1965. Introduction. In: Davis, P.H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Vol. 1. pp. 1-26. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
15. Davis, P.H. (ed.) 1965-1988. Flora of Turkey, Vols. 1-9. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
16. Davis, P.H. 1985. Why is the flora of Turkey interesting and important? Kew Magazine 2: 357-367.
17. Dengler, J., Löbel, S. & Dolnik, C. 2009. Species constancy depends on plot size - a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 754-766.
18. Dierschke, H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundlagen und Methoden. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
19. Dufour-Dror, J.M. & Ertaş, A. 2004. Bioclimatic perspectives in the distribution of Quercus ithaburensis Decne. subspecies in Turkey and in the Levant. Journal of Biogeography 31: 461-474.
20. Erol, O. 1982. Türkei. Naturräumliche Gliederung. Karte A VII 2. Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients, Wiesbaden, DE.
21. Greuter, W., Burdet, H.M. & Long, G. (eds.) 1986. Med-checklist 3. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Genève, CH.
22. Guneş, Y. & Coşkun, A.A. 2008. Forest tenureship report of Turkey. FAO, Rome, IT.
23. Hedge, I.C. & Yaltirik, F. 1982: Quercus L. In: Davis, P.H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 7. pp. 659-683. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
24. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978.
25. Jansen, F. & Dengler, J. 2010. Plant names in vegetation databases - a neglected source of bias. Journal of Vegetation Science 21: 1179-1186.
26. Karaer, F., Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç, M. & Kutbay, H.G. 1999. The woody vegetation of the Kelkit Valley. Turkish Journal of Botany 23: 319-344.
27. Kargi{dotless}oǧlu, M. & Tatli{dotless}, A. 2005. A phytosociological research on the forest vegetation of Yandaǧ (Isparta-Turkey). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 8: 929-939.
28. Kargi{dotless}oǧlu, M., Şenkul, Ç., Serteser, A. & Konuk, M. 2009. Bioclimatic requirements of Quercus vulcanica (Boiss et Heldr. ex) Kotschy - an endemic species in Turkey. Polish Journal of Ecology 57: 197-200.
29. Kavgaci{dotless}, A., Čarni, A., Tecimen, B. & Ozalp, G. 2010. Diversity and ecological differentiation of oak forests in NW Thrace (Turkey). Archives of Biological Sciences 62: 705-718.
30. Ketenoglu, O., Tug, G.N., Bingol, U., Geven, F., Kurt, L. & Guney, K. 2010. Synopsis of syntaxonomy of Turkish forests. Journal of Environmental Biology 31: 71-80.
31. Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç, M. 1985. İç Anadolu-Bati{dotless} Karadeniz geçiş bölgesinde Devrez çayi{dotless} ile Ki{dotless}zi{dotless}li{dotless}rmak nehri arasi{dotless}ndaki kalan bölgenin vejetasyonu. [The vegetation of the area between the rivers Devrez and Ki{dotless}zi{dotless}li{dotless}rmak along the boundaries of the regions Central Anatolia and West Black Sea.]. Doǧa Bilim Dergisi, ser. A2 9: 315-357.
32. Knollová, I., Chytrý, M., Ti{dotless}chý, L. & Hájek, O. 2005. Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 479-486.
33. Kutbay, G.H. & Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç, M. 1995. Bafra Nebyan Daǧi{dotless} (Samsun) ve çevresinin vejetasyonu üzerinde fitososyolojik ve ekolojik bir araşti{dotless}rma. [A phytosociological and ecological investigation of Mount Bafra Nebyan (Samsun) and its environs.]. Turkish Journal of Botany 19: 41-63.
34. Kutbay, H.G., Karaer, F. & Ki{dotless}li{dotless}nç, M. 1999. Orta Karadeniz Bölges'inde bulunan Quercus L. ormanlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n fitososyolojik yapi{dotless}si{dotless}. [Phytosociological structure of Quercus forests in Central Black Sea region]. Ondokuz Mayi{dotless}s Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 910: 1-17.
35. Lengyel, A., Chytrý, M. & Tichý, L. 2011. Heterogeneity-constrained random resampling of phytosociological databases. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 175-183.
36. Mayer, H. & Aksoy, H. 1986. Wälder der Türkei. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, DE.
37. Menitsky, Yu.L. (ed.) 2005. Oaks of Asia. Science, Enfield, UK.
38. Meusel, H. & Jäger, E. 1992. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Karten, Vol. 3. G. Fischer, Jena, DE.
39. Muthoo, M.K. 2001. Forests and forestry in Turkey. Ministry of Forests, Ankara, TK.
40. Økland, R.H. 2007. Wise use of statistical tools in ecological field studies. Folia Geobotanica 42: 123-140.
41. Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d'Italia. Edagricole, Bologna, IT.
42. Plieninger, T., Schaich, H. & Kizos, T. 2011. Land-use legacies in the forest structure of silvopastoral oak woodlands in the Eastern Mediterranean. Regional Environmental Change 11: 603-615.
43. Quézel, P., Barbéro, M. & Akman, Y. 1980. Contribution à l'étude de là végétation forestière d'Anatolie septentrionale. Phytocoenologia 8: 365-519.
44. Roleček, J. 2005. Vegetation types of dry-mesic oak forests in Slovakia. Preslia 77: 241-261.
45. Roleček, J. 2007. Formalized classification of thermophilous oak forests in the Czech Republic: what brings the Cocktail method? Preslia 79: 1-21.
46. Roleček, J., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Lvončík, S. & Tichý, L. 2007. Sampling design in large-scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism!. Folia Geobotanica 42: 199-208.
47. Roleček, J., Tichý, L., Zelený, D. & Chytrý, M. 2009. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 596-602.
48. Schaminée, J.H.J., Hennekens, S.M., Chytrý, M. & Rodwell, J.S. 2009. Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia 81: 173-185.
49. Schwarz, O. 1993. Quercus L. In: Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds.) Flora Europaea, Vol. 1., 2nd ed. pp. 72-76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
50. Simonová, D. 2008. Vegetation of trampled habitats in the Czech Republic: a formalized phytosociological classification. Phytocoenologia 38: 177-191.
51. Tatli{dotless}, A., Eyce, B. & Serin, M. 1994. Ki{dotless}zi{dotless}lören, Çal ve Loras Daǧlari{dotless} (Konya) vejetasyonu. [The vegetation of Kizilören, Çal and Loras Mountains]. Turkish Journal of Botany 18: 267-288.
52. Tichý, L. & Chytrý, M. 2006. Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 809-818.
53. Türe, C., Tokur, S. & Ketenoǧlu, O. 2005. Contributions to the syntaxonomy and ecology of the forest and shrub vegetation in Bithynia, northwestern Anatolia, Turkey. Phyton 45: 81-115.
54. Türker, M.F., Pak, M. & Öztürk, A. 2005: Turkey. In: Merlo, M. & Croitoru, L. (eds.) Valuing Mediterranean forests. Towards total economic value. pp. 195-211. CABI Publishing, Wallingford & Cambridge, UK.
55. Uǧurlu, E. & Oldeland, J. 2012. Species response curves of oak species along climatic gradients in Turkey. International Journal of Biometeorology 56: 85-93.
56. Uslu, E., Bakiş, Y. & Babaç, M.T. 2011. A study on biogeographical distribution of Turkish oak species and their relations with the Anatolian diagonal. Acta Botanica Hungarica 53: 423-440.
57. Varol, Ö., Ketenoǧlu, O., Bingöl, Ü., Geven, F. & Güney, K. 2006. A phytosociological study on the coniferous forests of Başkonuş Mts, Anti-Taurus, Turkey. Acta Botanica Hungarica 48: 195-211.
58. Vural, M., Duman, H., Guner, A., Donmez, A. & Sagban, H. 1995. The vegetation of Köyceǧiz-Dalyan (Muǧla) specially protected area. Turkish Journal of Botany 19: 431-476.
59. Willner, W. & Grabherr, G. (eds.) 2007. Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs. Ein Bestimmungswerk mit Tabellen. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, DE.
60. World Bank 2001. Turkey forestry sector review. Report no. 22458-TU. World Bank, Washington, DC, US.
61. Yurdakulol, E., Demirörs, M. & Yildiz, A. 2002. A phytosociological study of the vegetation of the Devrekani-Inebolu-Abana area (Kastamonu, Turkey). Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 50: 293-311.
62. Zieliński, J., Petrova, A. & Tomaszewski, D. 2006. Quercus trojana subsp. yaltirikii (Fagaceae), a new subspecies from southern Turkey. Willdenowia 36: 845-849.
63. Zohary, M. 1973. Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East, Vol 2. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, DE; Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam, NL.