Editorial Responsibility: Managing the Publishing Process to Do Good and Do Well

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 407-422

  Aguinis, Herman ^a,b   Vaschetto, Sofia J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethical dilemma; Ethics; Journal editing; Organizational responsibility; Social performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255124855     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00223.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguinis, H. 2009. Performance management (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
2. Aguinis, H. 2011. Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology vol. 3: 855-879. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Aguinis, H., de Bruin, G. P., Cunningham, D., Hall, N. L., Culpepper, S. A., & Gottfredson, R. K. 2010. What does not kill you (sometimes) makes you stronger: Productivity fluctuations of journal editors. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(4): 683-695.
4. Aguinis, H., Boyd, B. K., Pierce, C. A., & Short, J. C. 2011. Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37(1): 395-403.
5. Alexandrescu, F. 2007. Review of the book Community rights and corporate responsibility: Canadian mining and oil companies in Latin America. Critical Sociology, 33(3): 593-595.
6. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4): 45-62.
7. Barley, S. R. 2008. A letter to editors. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 39-48. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
8. Baruch, Y. 2008. Opening the black box of editorship: Editors' voice. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 209-222. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
9. Baruch, Y., Konrad, A. M., Aguinis, H., & Starbuck, W. M. (Eds.), 2008. Opening the black box of editorship New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
10. Campbell, J. P. 1982. Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6): 691-600.
11. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. 2008. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5): 1062-1081.
12. Certo, S. T., Sirmon, D., & Brymer, R. 2010. Competition and scholarly productivity in management: Investigating changes in scholarship from 1988 to 2008. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(4): 591-606.
13. Cochran, P. L. 2007. The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6): 449-454.
14. DeNisi, A. S. 2008. Managing the editorial review process: It's the people that matter. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 75-87. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
15. Elkjaer, B. 2009. Review of Opening the Black Box of Editorship by Yehuda Baruch, Alison M. Konrad, Herman Aguinis, and William Starbuck. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1): 133-134.
16. Feldman, D. C. 2008. Building and maintaining a strong editorial board and cadre of ad hoc reviewers. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 68-74. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
17. Fiol, C. M., O'Connor, E. J., & Aguinis, H. 2001. All for one and one for all? The development and transfer of power across organizational levels. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 224-242.
18. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach Boston, MA: Pitman Press.
19. García-Izquierdo, A. L., Aguinis, H., & Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. 2010. Science-practice gap in e-recruitment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(4): 432-438.
20. Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. 1992. The determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5): 921-955.
21. Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. 2007. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1385-1399.
22. Kacmar, K. M. 2008. Setting up an effective manuscript-review process. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 49-55. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
23. Ketchen, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. 2010. From the editors: Upon further review: A survey of the Academy of Management Journal's editorial board. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2): 208-217.
24. Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. 1994. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal articles. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1): 194-203.
25. Latham, G. P. 2007. A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavior science findings to the workplace: 'The times they are a-changin'. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 1027-1032.
26. MacDonald, S., & Kam, J. 2007. Ring a ring o' roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4): 640-655.
27. Medoff, M. H. 2003. Editorial favoritism in economics? Southern Economic Journal, 70(2): 425-434.
28. Morgeson, F. P., Aguinis, H., Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. 2011. Special issue call for papers: Corporate social responsibility and human resource management/organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 64(1): 283-285.
29. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403-441.
30. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. 2010. Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1): 94-120.
31. Rupp, D. 2011. Ethical issues faced by editors and reviewers. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
32. Ryan, A. M. 2008. How may I help you? Editing as service. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 27-38. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
33. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. 2001. Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 340-355.
34. Schmidt-Wilk, J. 2009. Review of Opening the Black Box of Editorship, by Yehuda Baruch, Alison M. Konrad, Herman Aguinis, and William Starbuck. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1): 135-136.
35. Schminke, M. 2009. Editor's comments: The better angels of our nature - Ethics and integrity in the publishing process. Academy of Management Review, 34(4): 586-591.
36. Schminke, M., & Mitchell, M. 2003. From the editors: In the beginning.... Academy of Management Journal, 46(3): 279-282.
37. Shapiro, D. L., & Bartunek, J. 2008. Being an ethical editorial board member and editor: The integral role of earned trust. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 88-96. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
38. Starbuck, W. H., Aguinis, H., Konrad, A. M., & Baruch, Y. 2008. Epilogue: Trade-offs in complex publishing environments. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 250-270. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
39. Tsui, A. S., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 2009. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2): 259-275.
40. Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2000. A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26(5): 839-861.
41. Varley, P. (Ed.). 1998. The sweatshop quandary: Corporate responsibility on the global frontier Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center.
42. Vince, R. 2009. Review of Opening the Black Box of Editorship, by Yehuda Baruch, Alison M. Konrad, Herman Aguinis, and William Starbuck. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1): 136-138.
43. Wang, H. C., & Barney, J. B. 2006. Employee incentives to make firm-specific investments: Implications for resource based theories of corporate diversification. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 466-476.
44. Wiseman, R. M., & Skilton, P. F. 1999. Divisions and differences: Exploring publication preferences and productivity across management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(3): 299-320.
45. Wright, T. A. 2011. And justice for all: Our research participants considered as valued stakeholders. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
46. Zedeck, S. 2008. Editing a top academic journal. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 145-156. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.