Past, present, and future of cervical arthroplasty

Keio Journal of Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 47-52

  Oh, Chang Hyun ^a   Yoon, Seung Hwan ^b  

^a Guro Teun Teun Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Inha University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment degeneration; Cervical total disc replacement; Multilevel; Sagittal balance; Spondylosis

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KYPHOSIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SAFETY; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINE FUSION; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISPLACEMENT; NEUROSURGERY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879406431     PISSN: 00229717     EISSN: 18801293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2302/kjm.2012-0014-RE     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Bose B: Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating: analysis of results and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1998; 49: 25-31. Medline] [CrossRef]
2. Cloward RB: Cervical diskography; technique, indications and use in diagnosis of ruptured cervical disks. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1958; 79: 563-574. Medline]
3. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J: Long-term follow- up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 79-85. Medline] [CrossRef]
4. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK: Robinson anterior cervical discetcomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy: long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1298-1307. Medline]
5. Chen J, Wang X, Bai W, Shen X, Yuan W: Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a metaanalysis. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 674-680. Medline] [CrossRef]
6. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS: Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002; 27: 2431-2434. Medline] [CrossRef]
7. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Na- kanishi K: Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 1999; 24: 670-675. Medline] [CrossRef]
8. Park SB, Jahng TA, Chung CK: Remodeling of adjacent spinal alignments following cervical arthroplasty and anterior discecto- my and fusion. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 322-327. Medline] [Cross-Ref]
9. Wu JC, Huang WC, Tu TH, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Wu CL, Cheng H: Differences between soft-disc herniation and spondylosis in cervical arthroplasty: CT-documented heterotopic ossification with minimum 2 years of follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 163-171. Medline] [CrossRef]
10. Coric D, Finger F, Boltes P: Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4: 31-35. Medline] [CrossRef]
11. Pracyk JB, Traynelis VC: Treatment of the painful motion segment: cervical arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:S23-S32.
12. Stachniak J, Sawin P, Mummaneni P, Ceola W, Zdeblick T: Prestige ST cervical disc IDE study: five site pooled data. Spine J 2006; 6: 18S-19S. CrossRef]
13. Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Sharma A: In vivo evaluation of dynamic characteristics of the normal, fused, and disc replacement cervical spines. Spine 2007; 32: 2578-2584. Medline] [CrossRef]
14. Park JH, Roh KH, Cho JY, Ra YS, Rhim SC, Noh SW: Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r)-cage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008; 44: 217-221. Medline] [CrossRef]
15. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC: Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 417-423. Medline] [CrossRef]
16. Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC: Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 20-29. Medline] [CrossRef]
17. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG: Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007; 32: 2933-2940. Medline] [CrossRef]
18. Cepoiu-Martin M, Faris P, Lorenzetti D, Prefontaine E, Noseworthy T, Sutherland L: Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:E1623-1633.
19. Bartels RH, Donk R, Verbeek AL: No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 1153-1160. Medline] [CrossRef]
20. Garrido BJ, Taha T, Sasso R: Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010; 23: 367-371. Medline] [CrossRef]
21. Mummaneni PV, Burkus J, Haid R, Traynelis V, Zdeblick T: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 198-209. Medline] [CrossRef]
22. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B: Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multi center Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 2009; 9: 275-286. Medline] [CrossRef]
23. Quan GM, Vital JM, Hansen S, Pointillart V: Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:639-646.
24. Yu L, Song Y, Yang X, Lv C: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Orthopedics 2011; 34: E651-E658. Medline]
25. Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 348-358. Medline] [CrossRef]
26. Richards O, Choi D, Timothy J: Cervical arthroplasty: the beginning, the middle, the end? Br J Neurosurg 2012; 26: 2-6.Medline] [CrossRef]
27. Auerbach JD, Anakwenze OA, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA: Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:E1593-1599.
28. Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM: Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:721-730.
29. Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B, Yan W, Li M, Yuan W, Wang Y: Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:433-438.
30. Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, Perrin G, Skalli W: Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 432-442. Medline] [CrossRef]
31. Barrey C, Champain S, Campana S, Ramadan A, Perrin G, Skalli W: Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2012;Epub ahead of print].
32. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR: Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2138-2144.
33. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-528. Medline]
34. Reitan CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI: Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:E221-226.
35. Goffin J, van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Sgrambiglia R, Pointillart V: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:2673-2678.
36. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Bellera FP, Link HD: Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervi- tech) disc. Spine J 2004; 4: 315S-321S. Medline] [CrossRef]
37. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC: Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1165-1172.
38. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ: Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2006; 6: 233-241. Medline] [CrossRef]
39. Sears WR, Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Williamson OD: Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis-does it occur? J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 1-6. Medline] [CrossRef]
40. Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Hipp JA, Wharton ND, Anderson PA. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:991-996.
41. Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA: Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:2001-2007.
42. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH: Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 943-950. Medline] [CrossRef]
43. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N: Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E5. Medline] [CrossRef]
44. Cao JM, Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Xu JX, Ding WY, Yang DL, Zhang D: Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18: 1308-1312. Medline] [CrossRef]
45. Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Park HK, Jang IT, Yoon DH: Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty. Spine 2007; 32: 1986-1991. Medline] [CrossRef]
46. Bhattacharya S, Goel VK, Liu X, Kiapour A, Serhan HA: Models that incorporate spinal structures predict better wear performance of cervical artificial discs. Spine J 2011; 11: 766-776. Medline] [CrossRef]
47. Lee MJ, Hacquebord J, Varshney A, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Konodi MA, Chapman J: Risk factors for medical complication after lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 767 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:1801-1806.
48. Martin S, Ghanayem AJ, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Renner SM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG: Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1359-1366.
49. Cardoso MJ, Mendelsohn A, Rosner MK: Cervical hybrid arthroplasty with 2 unique fusion techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 48-54. Medline] [CrossRef]
50. Cardoso MJ, Rosner MK: Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E19. Medline] [CrossRef]
51. Sekhon LH: Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondy- lotic myelopathy: 18-month results. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E8. Medline] [CrossRef]
52. Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Bernard P, Dufour T, Hovorka I, Stecken J, Dam-Hieu P, Fuentes JM, Vital JM, Vila T, Aubourg L: Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1417-1426. Medline] [CrossRef]
53. Roberto RF, McDonald T, Curtiss S, Neu CP, Kim K, Pennings F: Kinematics of progressive circumferential ligament resection (decompression) in conjunction with cervical disc arthroplasty in a spondylotic spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:1676-1683.
54. Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, Voronov LI, Ri- nella A, Dooris A, Carandang G, Renner SM, Havey RM, Pat- wardhan AG: Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:2965-2969.