Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the bryan cervical disc arthroplasty

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 639-646

  Quan, Gerald M Y ^a   Vital, Jean Marc ^a   Hansen, Steve ^a   Pointillart, Vincent ^a,b  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

Author keywords

cervical arthroplasty; clinical; heterotopic ossifi cation; movement; radiological outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BRYAN CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADICULOPATHY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79955054028     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc9b51     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bryan VE Jr. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 2002;11:S92-7.
2. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002;51:840-5.
3. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate followup after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003;28: 2673-8. (Pubitemid 37543472)
4. Porchet F, Metcalf NH. Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II Cervical Disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:36-43.
5. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6:198-209. (Pubitemid 47066071)
6. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40. (Pubitemid 350307273)
7. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 2008;33:1305-12.
8. Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Sasso R, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2354-64.
9. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 2009;34:101-7.
10. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disc lesions. J Am Med Assoc 1958;166:223-8.
11. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, et al. The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 2004;4:S303-9.
12. Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, et al. Fusion versus Bryan cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomized study. Int Orthop 2008;33:1037-42.
13. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 2009;18:218-31.
14. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, et al. Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine 2007;32:1337-44. (Pubitemid 46795283)
15. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Shariat K, et al. The ProDisc-C prosthesis: clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery. Spine 2007;32:1935-41. (Pubitemid 47300993)
16. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 2009;9:275-86.
17. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:30-5.
18. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heteroptopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 2005;57:759-63.
19. Mehran C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 2006;31:2802-6. (Pubitemid 44772781)
20. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:384-9.
21. Wenger M, van Hoonacker P, Zachee B, et al. Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: preservation of function over time. J Clin Neuro 2009;16:220-5.
22. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, et al. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 2002;27:2446-52. (Pubitemid 35346152)
23. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, et al. Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J 2004;4:S315-21.
24. Panjabi MM, White AA, Johnson RM. Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. J Biomech 1975;8:327-36.
25. Reitman CA, Mauro KM, Nguyen L, et al. Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 2004;29:2832-43.
26. Wu SK, Kuo LC, Lan HC, et al. The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1435-44.
27. Neal B. Effects of heterotopic bone formation on outcome after hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:422-6. (Pubitemid 36897824)
28. Rama KR, Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, et al. Heterotopic ossification after surface arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:256-62.
29. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, et al. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2006;6:233-41.
30. Sears WR, Duggal N, Sekhon LH, et al. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-contributing factors. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:111-7. (Pubitemid 46588320)
31. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, et al. Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 1995;8:499-508.
32. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine 1998;23:247-51.
33. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:519-28. (Pubitemid 29211592)
34. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 2002;96:17-21. (Pubitemid 34226534)
35. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:314-23.