Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: An in vitro investigation

European Spine Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 432-442

  Cédric, Barrey ^a,b,c   Campana, Sophie ^b   Persohn, Sylvain ^b   Perrin, Gilles ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^c NONE   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Biomechanical testing; Biomechanics; Cervical spine; Disc replacement; Intradiscal pressure; Kinematics; Multilevel

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHRODESIS; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; KINEMATICS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; TOTAL DISK REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84862834225     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1974-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Huang RC, Wright TM, Panjabi MM, Lipman JD (2005) Bio-mechanics of nonfusion implants. Orthop Clin North Am 36:271-280
2. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81:519-528 (Pubitemid 29211592)
3. Durbhakula MM, Ghiselli G (2005) Cervical total disc replace-ment, part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am 36:349-354 (Pubitemid 40805095)
4. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Brayda-Bruno M, Fornari M (2008) Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a lit-erature review. Clin Biomech 23:1095-1104
5. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, Van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan® cervical disc pros-thesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673-2678 (Pubitemid 37543472)
6. Porchet F, Metcalf N (2004) Clinical outcomes with the prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective random-ised clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6
7. Bertagnoli R, Duggal N, Pickett GE, Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Karg A et al (2005) Cervical total disc replacement, part two: clinical results. Orthop Clin North Am 36:255-262
8. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N (2005) Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:1949-1954 (Pubitemid 41292218)
9. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial with 24 month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:481-491 (Pubitemid 47524952)
10. Bhadra AK, Raman AS, Casey AT, Crawford RJ (2009) Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effec-tiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 18:232-237
11. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ et al (2009) Comparison of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34:101-107
12. Goffin J, Van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B (2010) A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 12:261-269
13. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275-286
14. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, Langdon I, Metcalf N, Robertson J (2002) Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 96:S17-S21
15. MacAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L (2003) Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal liga-ment. Spine 28:S176-S185 (Pubitemid 37266723)
16. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, McVay BJ, Davis RC (2003) Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:314-323
17. Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, Hu S, Tay BK, Lotz JC (2004) Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kine-matics. Spine 29:2809-2814
18. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30:1165-1172 (Pubitemid 40695927)
19. Barrey C, Mosnier T, Jund J, Perrin G, Skalli W (2009) In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. J Neurosurg Spine 11:538-546
20. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Diaz R, Coutinho E (2007) Superiority of multilevel cervical arthro-plasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine 32:1337-1344 (Pubitemid 46795283)
21. Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y (2009) Fusion versus Bryan cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomized study. Int Orthop 33:1347-1351
22. Phillips FM, Allen TR, Regan JJ, Albert TJ, Cappuccino A, Devine JG et al (2009) Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study. Spine 34:556-565
23. Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Ca-randang G, Dooris A et al (2009) Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Spine 34:E794-E799
24. Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2010) Biome-chanical comparison of single and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J 10:341-349
25. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, Diener H, Meade KP, Dunlap B, Hodges SD (2000) Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a fol-lower load. Spine 25:1548-1554 (Pubitemid 30418470)
26. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J et al (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculo-skeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Méd 189:287-297
27. Rousseau MA, Laporte S, Chavary-Bernier E, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2007) Reproducibility of measuring the shape and three-dimensional position of cervical vertebrae in upright posi-tion using the EOS stereoradiography system. Spine 32:2569-2572 (Pubitemid 350059483)
28. Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K et al (1998) Criticial load of the human cervical spine: an In vitro experimental study. Clin Biomech 13:11-17 (Pubitemid 28192636)
29. Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A, Oda T, Cholewicki J, Nibu K et al (2001) Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine 26:2692-2700 (Pubitemid 34019758)
30. T in the human cadaveric spine under physiologic compressive follower preload: a comparative study between load control protocol and hybrid protocol. J Korean Neurosurg 46:144-151
31. Snyder JT, Tzermiadianos MN, Ghanayem AJ, Voronov LI, Ri-nella A, Dooris A et al (2007) Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Spine 32:2965-2969 (Pubitemid 350307278)
32. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compard with allograft fusion: a randomized con-trolled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198-209 (Pubitemid 47066071)
33. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
34. Amevo B, Worth D, Bogduk N (1991) Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: a study in nor-mal volunteers. Clin Biomech 6:111-117
35. Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Novotny J, Antinnes J (1991) In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthop Res 9:828-834
36. Watier B (1997) Etude expérimentale du rachis cervical: com-portement mécanique in vitro et cinématique in vivo [thesis]. Paris: Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Arts et Metiers Paris-Tech
37. Bogduk N, Mercer S (2000) Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: normal kinematics. Clin Biomech 15:633-648 (Pubitemid 30628506)
38. Cunningham BWHUN, Beatson HJ, Serhan H, Sefter JC, McAfee PC (2009) Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective. Spine J 9:735-743
39. Goel VK, Wilder DJ, Pope MH, Edwards WT (1995) Contro-versy: biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement- controlled analysis. Spine 20:2354-2357
40. Wilke H-J, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7:148-154 (Pubitemid 28223601)
41. Goel VK, Panjabi MM, Patwardhan AG, Dooris AP, Serhan H (2006) Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. J Bone Joint Surg 88-A:103-109
42. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431-2434 (Pubitemid 35346149)
43. Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discec-tomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7:33-39 (Pubitemid 47067737)
44. Wen N, Lavaste F, Santin JJ, Lassau JP (1993) Three-dimen-sional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro. I. Analysis of normal motion. Eur Spine J 2:2-11 (Pubitemid 23175572)