Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 1986-1991

  Yi, Seong ^a   Shin, Hyun Chul ^b   Kim, Keung Nyun ^b   Park, Hyang Kwon ^a   Jang, Il Tae ^a   Yoon, Do Heum ^b  

^a Nanoori Gangnam Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Bryan disc; Insertion angle; Insertion depth; Kyphosis; Paradoxical biomechanical stress

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; KYPHOSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34548119796     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fb99     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, et al. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:943-50.
2. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 2004;29:2779-86.
3. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
4. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002;51:840-5, discussion 845-7.
5. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP, Bryan VE, et al. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine 2003;28(suppl):186-94.
6. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004;17:79-85.
7. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossi-fication in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 2005;57:759-63, discussion 763.
8. Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery 2005;57:E194.
9. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:377-80.
10. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, et al. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2006;6:233-41.
11. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17:E5.
12. Abd-Alrahman N, Dokmak AS, Abou-Madawi A. Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) versus anterior cervical fusion (ACF), clinical and radiological outcome study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1089-92.
13. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, et al. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 2001;10:320-4.
14. Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, et al. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 2004;29:2809-14.
15. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2005;30:1165-72.