Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 350-355

  Purmann, Sascha ^a   Badde, Stephanie ^b   Wendt, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66849093548     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.350     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csáki (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
3. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
4. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
5. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
6. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
7. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
8. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
9. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
10. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174.
11. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
12. R Development Core Team (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.r-project.org.
13. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323.
14. Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1971). Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 203-206.
15. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
16. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
17. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472.