Conflict-induced perceptual filtering

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 675-686

  Wendt, Mike ^a   Luna Rodriguez, Aquiles ^a   Jacobsen, Thomas ^a  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attentional adjustment; Cognitive conflict; Flanker task; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONFLICT; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867354785     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025902     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andersen, S. K., Müller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-7. doi:10.1167/9.6.2
2. Battye, G., & Barnard, P. J. (2002). The anterior cingulate cortex and conflict monitoring: FMRI studies from a range of paradigms implicate inhibitory mechanisms in top-down attentional control. Poster presented on the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. NeuroImage, 16, 657.
3. Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 221-225. doi:10.3758/BF03209396
4. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
5. Brawn, P., & Snowden, R. J. (1999). Can one pay attention to a particular color? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 860-873. doi:10.3758/BF03206902
6. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-552. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.529
7. Corballis, P. M., & Gratton, G. (2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology, 64, 191-209. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00109-1
8. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. doi:10.3758/BF03193850
9. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532. doi:10.1080/17470210902752096
10. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
11. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790. doi:10.1038/nn1594
12. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
13. Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Attentional search of the visual field. In D. Brogan (Ed.), Visual search (pp. 3-19). London, UK: Taylor Francis.
14. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240. doi:10.3758/BF03211502
15. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-587. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.583
16. Freitas, A. L., Bahar, M., Yang, S., & Banai, R. (2007). Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks. Psychological Science, 18, 1040-1043. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02022.x
17. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
18. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268. doi:10.1007/BF00419656
19. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. doi:10.1080/713756773
20. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521. doi:10.1080/13506280344000400
21. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
22. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. doi:10.3758/BF03194000
23. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-847. doi:10.1037/a0019842
24. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x
25. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367. doi:10.3758/BF03193413
26. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371-379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.371
27. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 96, 125-144. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.125
28. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2008). On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 814-818. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.814
29. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90019-5
30. Mattler, U. (2006). Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1745-1763. doi:10.1080/17470210500344494
31. Merikle, P. M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 219-236. doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0310
32. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
33. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1296-1310. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1296
34. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
35. Purmann, S., Badde, S., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Wendt, M. (2011). Adaptation to frequent conflict in the Eriksen flanker task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 50-59. doi:10.1027/0269-8803/a000041
36. Purmann, S., Badde, S., & Wendt, M. (2009). Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 350-355. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.350
37. Shih, S.-I., & Sperling, G. (1996). Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 758-779. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.758
38. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345
39. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 131-139. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.131
40. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflictadaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472. doi:10.3758/CABN.5.4.467
41. Vietze, I., & Wendt, M. (2009). Context-specificity of conflict frequencydependent control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1391-1400. doi:10.1080/17470210802426908
42. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644-667. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644
43. Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Vietze, I. (2008). Location-specific vs. hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 135-140. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.135
44. Wendt, M., & Luna-Rodriguez, A. (2009). Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology, 56, 206-217. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206
45. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774