Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with applanation tonometry;Tonometría de rebote en la práctica clínica. Comparación con tonometría de aplanación

Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 273-278

  Lopez Caballero C ^a   Contreras, I ^a   Muñoz Negrete, Francisco J ^a,b   Rebolleda, G ^a   Cabrejas, L ^a   Marcelo, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Applanation tonometry; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Pachymetry; Rebound tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 34548410983     PISSN: 03656691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 367-408.
2. Kontiola A. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1997; 93: 265-276.
3. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000; 78: 142-145.
4. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, Danias J. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001; 73: 781-785.
5. Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, Chen B, Danias J. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (Tono-Pen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 942-946.
6. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1138-1141.
7. Wang WH, Millar JC, Pang IH, Wax MB, Clark AF. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4617-4621.
8. Morris CA, Crowston JG, Lindsey JD, Danias J, Weinreb RN. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse. Exp Eye Res 2006; 82: 1094-1099.
9. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242: 3-7.
10. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4578-4580.
11. Fernandes P, Diaz-Rey JA, Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2005; 25: 436-440.
12. Garcia-Resua C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E. Accuracy on the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 102-107.
13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dinamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 2156-2162.