Attractiveness of women's body: Body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and their relative importance

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 914-925

  Kościński, Krzysztof ^a  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

attractiveness; body mass index; hip ratio; mate choice; waist ; women.

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; MATE CHOICE; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH WORK; WOMENS HEALTH;

EID: 84879120769     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/art016     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Anderson JL, Crawford CB, Nadeau J, Lindberg T. 1992. Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol. 13:197-227.
2. Artero EG, Espana-Romero V, Ortega FB, Jiménez-Pavón D, Ruiz JR, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Bueno M, Marcos A, Gómez-Martinez S, Urzanqui A, et al. 2010. Health-related fitness in adolescents: underweight, and not only overweight, as an influencing factor. The AVENA study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 20:418-427.
3. Bleske-Rechek A, Lighthall M. 2010. Attractiveness and rivalry in women's friendships with women. Hum Nat. 21:82-97.
4. Brewer G, Archer J, Manning J. 2007. Physical attractiveness: the objective ornament and subjective self-ratings. J Evol Psychol. 5:29-38.
5. Brooks R, Shelly JP, Fan J, Zhai L, Chau DKP. 2010. Much more than a ratio: multivariate selection on female bodies. J Evol Biol. 23:2238-2248.
6. Brown PJ, Konner M. 1987. An anthropological perspective on obesity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 499:29-46.
7. Buss D. 1999. Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Cashdan E. 2008. Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: trade-offs between androgen- and estrogen-dependent traits. Curr Anthropol. 49:1099-1107.
8. Coetzee V, Perrett DI, Stephen ID. 2009. Facial adiposity: a cue to health? Perception. 38:1700-1711.
9. Coin A, Sergi G, Beninca P, Lupoli L, Cinti G, Ferrara L, Benedetti G, Tomasi G, Pisent C, Enzi G. 2000. Bone mineral density and body composition in underweight and normal elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int. 11:1043-1050.
10. Cornelissen PL, Hancock PJB, Kiviniemic V, George HR, Tovée MJ. 2009. Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio. Evol Hum Behav. 30:417-428.
11. Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC. 1991. Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas. Br J Nutr. 65:105-114.
12. Dijkstra P, Buunk BP. 2001. Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival's body build. Evol Hum Behav. 22:335-341.
13. Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. 2011a. Eye tracking of men's preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Arch Sex Behav. 40:51-58.
14. Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. 2011b. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav. 40:43-50.
15. Dixson BJ, Li B, Dixson AF. 2010. Female waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index and sexual attractiveness in China. Curr Zool. 56:175-181.
16. Donohoe ML, von Hippel W, Brooks RC. 2009. Beyond waist-hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive. Behav Ecol. 20:716-721.
17. Ember CR, Ember M, Korotayev A, De Munck V. 2005. Valuing thinness or fatness in women: reevaluating the effect of resource scarcity. Evol Hum Behav. 26:257-270.
18. Falconer DS. 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
19. Fallon AE, Rozin P. 1985. Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. J Abnorm Psychol. 94:102-105.
20. Fan J, Liu F, Wu J, Dai W. 2004. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:247-352.
21. Ferguson GA, Takane Y. 1989. Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. 2005. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. J Am Med Assoc. 293:1861-1867.
23. Frederick DA, Peplau LA, Lever J. 2006. The swimsuit issue: correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults. Body Image. 3:413-419.
24. Furnham A, Dias M, McClellan A. 1998. The role of body weight' waistto- hip ratio' and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles. 39:311-326.
25. Furnham A, Mistry D, McClelland A. 2004. The influence of age of the face and the waist to hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and traits. Pers Indiv Differ. 36:1171-1185.
26. Furnham A, Swami V, Shah K. 2006. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Pers Indiv Differ. 41:443-454.
27. Glauert R, Rhodes G, Byrne S, Fink B, Grammer K. 2009. Body dissatisfaction and the effects of perceptual exposure on body norms and ideals. Int J Eat Disord. 42:443-452.
28. Gottschall J. 2007. Greater emphasis on female attractiveness in Homo sapiens: a revised solution to an old evolutionary riddle. Evol Psychol. 5:347-357.
29. Green BB, Weiss NS, Daling JR. 1988. Risk of ovulatory infertility in relation to body weight. Fertil Steril. 50:721-726.
30. Gründl M, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. 2009. Quantifying female bodily attractiveness by a statistical analysis of body measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 123:1064-1071.
31. Harrison K. 2003. Television viewers' ideal body proportions: the case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles. 48:255-264.
32. Heaney M. 2000. Male preference for female waist-to-hip ratio: evolutionary adaptation, cultural confound, or methodological artefact? [Unpublished honours dissertation]. Auckland (New Zealand): Department of Psychology, University of Auckland.
33. Henss R. 1995. Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: Replication and extension. Pers Indiv Differ. 19:479-488.
34. Holliday IE, Longe OA, Thai NJ, Hancock PJ, Tovée MJ. 2011. BMI not WHR modulates BOLD fMRI responses in a sub-cortical reward network when participants judge the attractiveness of human female bodies. PLoS ONE. 6:e27255.
35. Jasie?ska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. 2004. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:1213-1217.
36. Jokela M, Kivimäki M, Elovainio M, Viikari J, Raitakari OT, Keltikangas- Järvinen L. 2007. Body mass index in adolescence and number of children in adulthood. Epidemiology. 18:599-606.
37. Jones DC. 2001. Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles. 45:645-664.
38. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond B. 269:1331-1340.
39. Kopelman PG. 2000. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 404:635-643.
40. Ko?ci?ski K. 2012. Mere visual experience impacts preference for body shape: evidence from male competitive swimmers. Evol Hum Behav. 33:137-146.
41. Lassek WD, Gaulin SJC. 2008. Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evol Hum Behav. 29:26-34.
42. Li NP, Kenrick DT. 2006. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. J Pers Soc Psychol. 90:468-489.
43. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. 2011. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Phil Trans R Soc B. 366:1638-1659.
44. Low BS, Alexander RD, Noonan KM. 1987. Human hips, breasts and buttocks: is fat deceptive? Ethol Sociobiol. 8:249-257.
45. Lusky A, Barell V, Lubin F, Kaplan G, Layani V, Shohat Z, Lev B, Wiener M. 1996. Relationship between morbidity and extreme values of body mass index in adolescents. Int J Epidemiol. 25:829-834.
46. Manning JT, Scutt D, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. 1997. Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evol Hum Behav. 18:223-236.
47. Molarius A, Seidell JC, Sans S, Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K. 1999. Waist and hip circumferences, and waist-hip ratio in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA Project. Int J Obes. 23:116-125.
48. Patzer GL. 2006. The power and paradox of physical attractiveness. Boca Raton (FL): Brown Walker Press.
49. Pawlowski B, Boothroyd LG, Perrett DI, Kluska S. 2008. Is female attractiveness related to final reproductive success? Coll Antropol. 32:457-460.
50. Paw?owski B, Dunbar RIM. 2005. Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women. Hum Nat. 16:164-177.
51. Paw?owski B, Grabarczyk M. 2003. Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. Am J Hum Biol. 15:144-150.
52. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. 1994. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature. 368:239-242.
53. Platek SM, Singh D. 2010. Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE. 5:e9042.
54. Pokrywka L, Cabri? M, Krakowiak H. 2006. Body mass index and waist: hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness. Perception. 35:1693-1697.
55. Prantl L, Gründl M. 2011. Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: an experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 35:693-702.
56. Puhl RM, Heuer CA. 2009. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 17:941-964.
57. Rilling JK, Kaufman TL, Smith EO, Patel R, Worthman CM. 2009. Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav. 30:21-31.
58. Rosenberg KR. 1992. The evolution of modern human childbirth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 89(S15):89-124.
59. Rozmus-Wrzesi?ska M, Paw?owski B. 2005. Men's ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more by waist than hip. Biol Psychol. 68:299-308.
60. Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:474-480.
61. Schützwohl A. 2006. Judging female figures: a new methodological approach to male attractiveness judgments of female waist-to-hip ratio. Biol Psychol. 71:223-229.
62. Singh D. 1993. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol. 65:293-307.
63. Singh D, Randall PK. 2007. Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women's attractiveness. Pers Indiv Differ. 43:329-340.
64. Singh D, Singh D. 2011. Shape and significance of feminine beauty: an evolutionary perspective. Sex Roles. 64:723-731.
65. Singh D, Young RK. 1995. Body weight, WHR, breasts, and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol Sociobiol. 16:483-507.
66. Smith KL, Tovée MJ, Hancock PJB, Bateson M, Cox MAA, Cornelissen PL. 2007. An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination. Vis Cogn. 15:927-953.
67. Staddon JER. 1975. A note on the evolutionary significance of "supernormal" stimuli. Am Nat. 109:541-545.
68. Streeter SA, McBurney DH. 2003. Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of "a critical test". Evol Hum Behav. 24:88-98.
69. Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, Anderson D, Andrianto S, Arora A, Brännström A, Cunningham J, et al. 2010. The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 36:309-325.
70. Swami V, Jones J, Einon D, Furnham A. 2009. Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. Br J Psychol. 100:313-325.
71. Swami V, Rozmus-Wrzesinska M, Voracek M, Haubner T, Danel D, Paw?owski B, Stanistreet D, Chaplin F, Chaudhri J, Sheth P, et al. 2008. The influence of skin tone, body weight, and hair colour on perceptions of women's attractiveness and health: a cross-cultural investigation. J Evol Psychol. 6:321-341.
72. Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A, Tovée MJ. 2008. Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment. Pers Indiv Differ. 44:1752-1761.
73. Swami V, Tovée MJ. 2006. Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness? Br J Psychol. 97:353-363.
74. Swami V, Tovée MJ. 2007. Differences in attractiveness preferences between observers in low-and high-resource environments in Thailand. J Evol Psychol. 5:149-160.
75. Tassinary LG, Hansen KA. 1998. A critical test of the waist-to-hipratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychol Sci. 9:150-155.
76. Thornhill R, Grammer K. 1999. The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality. Evol Hum Behav. 20:105-120.
77. Tovée MJ, Edmonds L, Vuong QC. 2012. Categorical perception of human female physical attractiveness and health. Evol Hum Behav. 33:85-93.
78. Tovée MJ, Maisey DS, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. 1999. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B. 266:211-218.
79. Vartanian LR, Herman CP, Polivy J. 2004. Accuracy in the estimation of body weight: an alternate test of the motivated-distortion hypothesis. Int J Eat Disord. 36:69-75.
80. Wade TD, Zhu G, Martin NG. 2010. Body mass index and breast size in women: same or different genes? Twin Res Hum Genet. 13:450-454.
81. Wilson JMB, Tripp DA, Boland FJ. 2005. The relative contributions of waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index to judgements of attractiveness. Sex Evol Gend. 7:245-267.
82. World Health Organization. 2011. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 8-11 December 2008.
83. World Health Organization. 2012. BMI classification. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro-3.html. Accessed 1 March 2013.
84. Zelazniewicz AM, Pawlowski B. 2011. Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Arch Sex Behav. 40:1129-1135.