Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness

Evolution and Human Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 21-31

  Rilling, James K ^a,b   Kaufman, Torrey L ^a   Smith, E O ^a   Patel, Rajan ^a   Worthman, Carol M ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Attractiveness; Waist to hip ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 56949103610     PISSN: 10905138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baghaei F., Rosmond R., et al. The CYP19 gene and associations with androgens and abdominal obesity in premenopausal women. Obesity Research 114 (2003) 578-585
2. Bjorntorp P. The android woman-a risky condition. Journal of Internal Medicine 2392 (1996) 105-110
3. Byrd-Bredbenner C., and Murray J. A comparison of the anthropometric measurements of idealized female body images in media directed to men, women, and mixed gender audiences. Topics in Clinical Nutrition 18 2 (2003) 117-129
4. Department of Health. Health Survey for England 2002- trends (2007). http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/PublishedSurvey/HealthSurveyForEngland/Healthsurveyresults/DH_4001334 Table 7
5. Fan J., Liu F., et al. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proceedings, Biological Sciences 271 1537 (2004) 347-352
6. Flegal K.M., Graubard B.I., et al. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 29315 (2005) 1861-1867 [see comment]
7. Freese J., and Meland S. Seven tenths incorrect: heterogeneity and change in the waist-to-hip ratios of Playboy centerfold models and Miss America pageant winners. Journal of Sex Research 39 2 (2002) 133-138
8. Frisancho A.R. Anthropometric standards for the assessment of growth and nutritional status (1990), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
9. Gangestad S.W., and Scheyd G.J. The evolution of physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology 34 (2005) 523-548
10. Grantham-McGregor S., Cheung Y.B., et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. The Lancet 3699555 (2007) 60-70
11. Isbell L.A., Pruetz J.D., et al. Locomotor activity differences between sympatric patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) and vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops): Implications for the evolution of long hindlimb length in Homo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105 2 (1998) 199-207
12. Jasienska G., Ziomkiewicz A., et al. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society London. Series B 2711545 (2004) 1213-1217
13. Kurzban R., and Weeden J. HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 3 (2005) 227-244
14. Lamounier-Zepter V., Ehrhart-Bornstein M., et al. Metabolic syndrome and the endocrine stress system. Hormone and Metabolic Research 38 7 (2006) 437-441
15. Lassek W.D., and Gaulin S.J. Changes in body fat distribution in relation to parity in American women: A covert form of maternal depletion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 131 2 (2006) 295-302
16. Lassek W.D., and Gaulin S.J.C. Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?. Evolution and Human Behavior 29 1 (2008) 26-34
17. Lassek W.D., and Gaulin S.J. Brief communication: Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 133 4 (2007) 1147-1151
18. Longcope C. Metabolism of dehydroepiandrosterone. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 774 (1996) 143-148
19. Lutchmaya S., Baron-Cohen S., et al. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Human Development 77 1-2 (2004) 23-28
20. Marlowe F., Apicella C., et al. Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior 26 6 (2005) 458-468
21. Martyn C.N., Barker D.J., et al. Mothers' pelvic size, fetal growth, and death from stroke and coronary heart disease in men in the UK. Lancet 3489037 (1996) 1264-1268 [see comment]
22. Mayes J.S., and Watson G.H. Direct effects of sex steroid hormones on adipose tissues and obesity. Obesity Reviews 5 4 (2004) 197-216
23. McIntyre M.H., Chapman J.F., et al. Index-to-ring finger length ratio (2D:4D) predicts levels of salivary estradiol, but not progesterone, over the menstrual cycle. American Journal of Human Biology 193 (2007) 434-436
24. Pontzer H. Effective limb length and the scaling of locomotor cost in terrestrial animals. The Journal of Experimental Biology 210 (2007) 1752-1761
25. Pyle S.I., Stuart H.C., et al. Onsets, completions, and spans of the osseous stage of development in representative bone growth centers of the extremities. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 261 (1961) 1-124
26. Rebuffe-Scrive M., Enk L., et al. Fat cell metabolism in different regions in women. Effect of menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and lactation. Journal of Clinical Investigation 756 (1985) 1973-1976
27. Sapolsky R.M. Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers (1994), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
28. Shepperd J.A., and Strathman A.J. Attractiveness and height. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15 4 (1989) 617-627
29. Shirtcliff E.A., Granger D.A., et al. Assessing estradiol in biobehavioral studies using saliva and blood spots: Simple radioimmunoassay protocols, reliability, and comparative validity. Hormones and Behavior 38 (2000) 137-147
30. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 292-307
31. Singh D. Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist to hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters 23 Suppl. 4 (2002) 81-91
32. Singh D., Renn P., et al. Did the perils of abdominal obesity affect depiction of feminine beauty in the sixteenth to eighteenth century British literature? Exploring the health and beauty link. Proceedings, Biological Sciences 274 1611 (2007) 891-894
33. Sorokowski P., and Pawlowski B. Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner. Evolution and Human Behavior 29 2 (2008) 86-91
34. Sugiyama L.S. Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior 25 1 (2004) 51-62
35. Tanner J.M. Fetus into Man (1990), Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
36. Thornhill R., and Grammer K. The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality?. Evolution and Human Behavior 20 (1999) 105-120
37. Tovee M.J., Hancock P.J., et al. Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings, Biological Sciences 269 1506 (2002) 2205-2213
38. Tovee M.J., Maisey D.S., et al. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings, Biological Sciences 266 1415 (1999) 211-218
39. In: Ulijaszek S., Johnston F.E., et al. (Eds). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Growth and Development (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
40. Veldhuis J.D., Roemmich J.N., et al. Somatotropic and gonadotropic axes linkages in infancy, childhood, and the puberty-adult transition. Endocrine Reviews 272 (2006) 101-140
41. Wetsman A., and Marlowe F. How universal are preferences for female waist to hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior 20 (1999) 219-228
42. Worthman C.M. Evolutionary perspectives on the onset of puberty. Evolutionary Medicine (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford 135-163
43. Yu D.W., and Shepard G.H. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?. Nature 396 (1998) 321-322