Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: An experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 693-702

  Prantl, Lukas ^a   Gründl, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Bodily attractiveness; Breast size; Bust size; Figure; Sex differences; Waist to hip ratio

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; WAIST HIP RATIO;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; BEAUTY; BODY IMAGE; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; WAIST-HIP RATIO; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054099501     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-011-9669-0     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. N Barber 1995 The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology Ethol Sociobiol 16 395 424 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
2. DM Buss 1995 Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science Psychol Inquiry 6 1 30 10.1207/s15327965pli0601-1
3. DM Buss 2007 The evolution of human mating Acta Psychologica Sinica 39 502 512
4. D Singh S Luis 1994 Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of WHR on judgment of women's attractiveness Hum Nat 6 51 65 10.1007/BF02734135 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7gtFyrsw%3D%3D
5. Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. DM Buss DP Schmitt 1993 Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating Psychol Rev 100 204 232 8483982 10.1037/0033-295X. 100.2.204 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3kvVektg%3D%3D
7. J Weeden J Sabini 2005 Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review Psychol Bull 131 635 653 16187849 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5. 635 (Pubitemid 41463576)
8. G Rhodes 2006 The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty Ann Rev Psychol 57 199 226 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 (Pubitemid 43237232)
9. R Thornhill SW Gangestad 2006 Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women Evol Hum Behav 27 131 144 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001 (Pubitemid 43246352)
10. CJ Ley B Lees JC Stevenson 1992 Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution Maturitas 15 261 262
11. Rebuffe-Scrive M (1988) Metabolic differences in fat deposits. In: Bouchard C, Johnston FE (eds) Fat distribution during growth and later health outcome. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 163-173
12. CM de-Ridder PF Bruning ML Zonderland JH Thijssen JM Bonfrer MA Blankenstein IA Huisveld WB Erich 1990 Body fat mass, body fat distribution, and plasma hormones in early puberty in females J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70 888 893 2318946 10.1210/jcem-70-4-888 1:STN:280:DyaK3c3gtlWluw%3D%3D
13. BM Zaadstra JC Seidell PA Van-Noord ER te Velde JD Habbema B Vrieswijk J Karbaat 1993 Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates BMJ 306 484 487 8448457 10.1136/bmj.306.6876. 484 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7pt1KqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23053156)
14. A Furnham M Lavanchy A McClelland 2001 Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: a pilot study Pers Indiv Differ 30 491 502 10.1016/S0191- 8869(00)00040-4 (Pubitemid 33630910)
15. A Furnham T Tan C McManus 1997 Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension Pers Indiv Differ 22 539 549 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00241-3 (Pubitemid 127169294)
16. R Henss 1995 Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension Pers Indiv Differ 19 479 488 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00093-L
17. R Henss 2000 Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations Pers Indiv Differ 28 501 513 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00115-4
18. D Singh 1993 Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio J Pers Soc Psychol 65 293 307 8366421 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293 1:STN:280:DyaK3sznsFCjug%3D%3D
19. D Singh 1993 Body shape and women's attractiveness: the critical role of waist-hip ratio Hum Nat 4 297 321 10.1007/BF02692203
20. D Singh 1994 Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness Pers Indiv Differ 16 123 132 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90116-3
21. D Singh 1994 Waist-to-hip ratio and judgments of attractiveness and healthiness by male and female physicians Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18 731 737 7866472 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ntVyjtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24334516)
22. D Singh 1994 Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women Int J Eat Disord 16 289 294 7833963 10.1002/1098-108X(199411)16:3<289::AID-EAT2260160310>3.0.CO;2-9 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7jsFCltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24331239)
23. D Singh 1995 Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio Ethol Sociobiol 16 465 481 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00073-9
24. D Singh R Young 1995 Body weight, WHR, breasts and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships Ethol Sociobiol 16 483 507 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7
25. SA Streeter DH McBurney 2003 Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of "a critical test" Evol Hum Behav 24 88 98 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00121-6 (Pubitemid 36198402)
26. A Furnham KV Petrides A Constantinides 2005 The effects of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on ratings of female attractiveness, fecundity, and health Pers Indiv Differ 38 1823 1834 10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.011 (Pubitemid 40533982)
27. Johnson KL, Tassinary LG (2007) Interpersonal metaperception: the importance of compatibility in the aesthetic appreciation of bodily cues. In: Swami V, Furnham AF (eds) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London
28. Swami V (2007) The missing arms of Vénus de Milo: reflections on the science of physical attractiveness. The Book Guild, Brighton
29. Swami V, Furnham A (2008) The psychology of physical attraction. Routledge, London
30. Swami V, Furnham A (2007) The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Macmillan, London
31. A Furnham E Reeves 2006 The relative influence of facial neoteny and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and fecundity Psychol Health Med 11 129 141 17129903 10.1080/13548500500155982 (Pubitemid 43995294)
32. MJ Tovée PL Cornelissen 1999 The mystery of female beauty Nature 399 215 216 10353243 10.1038/20345
33. MJ Tovée DS Maisey JL Emery PL Cornelissen 1999 Visual cues to female physical attractiveness Proc Biol Sci 266 211 218 10097394 10.1098/rspb.1999.0624 (Pubitemid 29048018)
34. MJ Tovée SM Mason JL Emery SE McCluskey EM Cohen-Tovée 1997 Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses? Lancet 350 1474 1475 9371185 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64238-9
35. MJ Tovée S Reinhardt JL Emery PL Cornelissen 1998 Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness Lancet 352 548 1242 9716069 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79257-6 (Pubitemid 28372236)
36. MJ Tovée PL Cornelissen 2001 Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile Br J Psychol 92 391 402 10.1348/000712601162257 (Pubitemid 33602732)
37. DW Yu GH Shepard 1998 Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 396 321 322 9845067 10.1038/24512 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXnvVamsbk%3D (Pubitemid 28557381)
38. KL Smith PL Cornelissen MJ Tovee 2007 Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness Evol Hum Behav 28 48 54 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006. 05.007 (Pubitemid 44858275)
39. J Sobal AJ Stunkard 1989 Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature Psychol Bull 105 260 275 2648443 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7osFWrsw%3D%3D
40. JL Anderson CB Crawford J Nadeau T Lindberg 1992 Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape Ethol Sociobiol 13 197 227 10.1016/0162-3095(92)90033-Z
41. N Barber 1998 Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in women: Tests of a reproductive model Int J Eat Disord 23 449 454 9561437 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199805)23:4<449::AID-EAT14>3.0.CO;2-R 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it1ahsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28155454)
42. N Barber 1998 Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals J Psychol 132 87 94 9447727 10.1080/00223989809599267 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gvFSgsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 128458978)
43. ML Fisher M Voracek 2006 The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness J Cosmet Dermatol 5 190 194 17173598 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x
44. B Silverstein B Peterson L Perdue 1986 Some correlates of thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women Int J Eat Disord 5 895 905 10.1002/1098-108X(198607)5:5<895::AID-EAT2260050510>3.0.CO;2-W (Pubitemid 16096457)
45. M Voracek ML Fisher 2002 Shapely centrefolds? temporal change in body measures: trend analysis BMJ 325 1447 1448 12493660 10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1447 (Pubitemid 36026791)
46. M Voracek ML Fisher 2006 Success is all in the measures: androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses Arch Sex Behav 35 297 304 16799840 10.1007/s10508-006-9021-y (Pubitemid 44060822)
47. G Jasienska A Ziomkiewicz PT Ellison SF Lipson I Thune 2004 Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women Proc Biol Sci 271 1213 1217 15306344 10.1098/rspb.2004.2712 (Pubitemid 38789312)
48. GD Smith R Greenwood D Gunnell P Sweetnam J Yarnell P Elwood 2001 Leg length, insulin resistance, and coronary heart disease risk: the Caerphilly Study J Epidemiol Community Health 55 867 872 11707479 10.1136/jech.55.12.867 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnlsVOhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33097219)
49. D Gunnell M May Y Ben-Shlomo J Yarnell GD Smith 2003 Height, leg length, and cancer: the Caerphilly Study Nutr Cancer 47 34 39 14769535 10.1207/s15327914nc4701-4 (Pubitemid 38250433)
50. D Gunnell E Whitley MN Upton A McConnachie GD Smith GC Watt 2003 Associations of height, leg length, and lung function with cardiovascular risk factors in the Midspan Family Study J Epidemiol Community Health 57 141 146 12540691 10.1136/jech.57.2.141 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FjtlyhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36160624)
51. DJ Gunnell G Davey-Smith S Frankel K Nanchahal FE Braddon J Pemberton TJ Peters 1998 Childhood leg length and adult mortality: follow up of the Carnegie (Boyd Orr) Survey of Diet and Health in Pre-war Britain J Epidemiol Community Health 52 142 152 9616418 10.1136/jech.52.3.142 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nvFeqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28130168)
52. DJ Gunnell GD Smith JM Holly S Frankel 1998 Leg length and risk of cancer in the Boyd Orr cohort BMJ 317 1350 1351 9812931 1:STN:280: DyaK1M%2FjtVajug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28515285)
53. C Langenberg R Hardy D Kuh ME Wadsworth 2003 Influence of height, leg and trunk length on pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure J Hypertens 21 537 543 12640247 10.1097/00004872-200303000-00019 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitFGlsb0%3D (Pubitemid 36418965)
54. DA Lawlor S Ebrahim G Davey-Smith 2002 The association between components of adult height and Type II diabetes and insulin resistance: British Women's Heart and Health Study Diabetologia 45 1097 1106 12189439 10.1007/s00125-002- 0887-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjt1Sisg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34985285)
55. Morris D (1987) Bodywatching. Grafton Books, London
56. V Swami D Einon A Furnham 2006 The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion Body Image 3 317 323 18089235 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.003 (Pubitemid 44848152)
57. N Allal R Sear AM Prentice R Mace 2004 An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women Proc Biol Sci 271 465 470 15129955 10.1098/rspb.2003.2623 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3jtVyhtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38283139)
58. P Sorokowski B Pawlowski 2008 Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner Evol Hum Behav 29 86 91 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.09.002
59. Buss DM (1992) Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 249-266
60. AE Fallon P Rozin 1985 Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape J Abnorm Psychol 94 102 105 3980849 10.1037/0021-843X.94.1.102 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7lvVGltg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16147367)
61. P Rozin A Fallon 1988 Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: a comparison of men and women in two generations J Abnorm Psychol 97 342 345 3192829 10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.342 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FlsVKjtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19068860)
62. AG Gitter J Lomranz L Saxe Y Bar-Tal 1983 Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students J Soc Psychol 121 7 13 6645426 10.1080/00224545.1983.9924460 1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2Fms1Whtg%3D%3D
63. D Jones 1997 An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness Evol Anthropol 5 97 109 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:3<97::AID-EVAN5>3.0. CO;2-T
64. S Tantleff-Dunn 2001 Breast and chest size: ideals and stereotypes through the 1990 s Sex Roles 45 231 242 10.1023/A:1013505928458 (Pubitemid 33380399)
65. T Horvath 1981 Physical attractiveness: the influence of selected torso parameters Arch Sex Behav 10 21 24 7212994 10.1007/BF01542671 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7lvFertQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 11131443)
66. A Furnham C Hester C Weir 1990 Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes Sex Roles 22 743 754 10.1007/BF00292058
67. JK Thompson S Tantleff 1992 Female and male ratings of upper torso: actual, ideal, and sterotypical conceptions J Soc Behav Pers 7 345 354
68. C Byrd-Bredbenner J Murray YR Schlussel 2005 Temporal changes in anthropometric measurements of idealized females and young women in general Women Health 41 13 30 16219585 10.1300/J013v41n02-02 (Pubitemid 41683286)
69. Grammer K (1995) Signale der Liebe. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München
70. MJ Tovée PJB Hancock S Mahmoodi BR Singleton PL Cornelissen 2002 Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape Proc Biol Sci 269 2205 2213 12427313 10.1098/rspb.2002.2133 (Pubitemid 35341906)
71. L Pokrywka M Cabrić H Krakowiak 2006 Body mass index and waist: hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness Perception 35 1693 1697 17283934 10.1068/p5506
72. T Seifert 2005 Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: trends towards slender figures over time Int J Eat Disord 37 271 274 15822083 10.1002/eat.20086 (Pubitemid 40628244)
73. A Furnham M Dias A McClelland 1998 The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness Sex Roles 39 311 326 10.1023/A:1018810723493 (Pubitemid 128366088)
74. A Furnham V Swami 2007 Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile Social Behav Pers 35 1 8 10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.1
75. LG Tassinary KA Hansen 1998 A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness Psychol Sci 9 150 155 10.1111/1467-9280.00029 (Pubitemid 128088970)
76. SB Beck CI Ward-Hull PM McLear 1976 Variables related to women's somatic preferences of the male and female body J Pers Soc Psychol 34 1200 1210 10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1200
77. JS Wiggins N Wiggins JC Conger 1968 Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference J Pers Soc Psychol 10 82 90 4386664 10.1037/h0026394 1:STN:280:DyaF1M%2FgvFamtw%3D%3D
78. CL Kleinke RA Staneski 1980 First impressions of female bust size J Soc Psychol 110 123 134 10.1080/00224545.1980.9924231
79. S Tantleff-Dunn 2002 Biggest isn't always best: the effect of breast size on perceptions of women J Appl Soc Psychol 32 2253 2265 10.1111/j.1559-1816. 2002.tb01862.x (Pubitemid 36256629)
80. B Silverstein L Perdue B Peterson L Vogel DA Fantini 1986 Possible causes of the thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women Int J Eat Disord 5 907 916 10.1002/1098-108X(198607)5:5<907::AID-EAT2260050511>3.0.CO;2-G (Pubitemid 16096458)
81. V Swami J Jones D Einon A Furnham 2009 Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa Br J Psychol 100 313 325 18625082 10.1348/000712608X329525
82. V Swami A Furnham 2009 Big and beautiful: attractiveness and health ratings of the female body by male "fat admirers" Arch Sex Behav 38 201 208 17680352 10.1007/s10508-007-9200-5
83. V Swami D Knight MJ Tovee P Davies A Furnham 2007 Preferences for female body size in Britain and the South Pacific Body Image 4 219 223 18089268 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.01.002
84. V Swami MJ Tovee 2007 The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgements of women's physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia Body Image 4 391 396 18089286 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.07.002
85. V Swami D Einon A Furnham 2007 Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia Asian J Soc Psychol 10 265 269 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00235.x
86. V Swami J Smith A Tsiokris C Georgiades Y Sangareau MJ Tovée A Furnham 2007 Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece: a cross-cultural study J Soc Psychol 147 15 26 17345919 10.3200/SOCP.147.1.15-26
87. V Swami MJ Tovee 2007 Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans Scand J Psychol 48 43 50 17257368 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00526.x
88. MJ Tovee V Swami A Furnham R Mangalparsad 2006 Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture Evol Hum Behav 27 443 456 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.004 (Pubitemid 44567494)
89. V Swami N Antonakopoulos MJ Tovee A Furnham 2006 A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of women's physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece Sex Roles 54 201 211 10.1007/s11199-006-9338-3 (Pubitemid 44127159)
90. V Swami C Caprario MJ Tovee A Furnham 2006 Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study Eur J Personality 20 69 81 10.1002/per.568 (Pubitemid 43384900)
91. K Schaefer B Fink K Grammer P Mitteroecker P Gunz FL Bookstein 2006 Female appearance: facial and bodily attractiveness as shape Psychol Sci 48 187 204