Much more than a ratio: Multivariate selection on female bodies

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2238-2248

  Brooks, R ^a   Shelly, J P ^a   Fan, J ^b   Zhai, L ^b,c   Chau, D K P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c TIANJIN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adiposity; Body mass index; Nonlinear selection analysis; Sexual selection; Waist hip ratio

Indexed keywords

AGE; BODY MASS; FITNESS; HOMINID; MATE ATTRACTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BODY CONSTITUTION; BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BEAUTY; BODY CONSTITUTION; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956586293     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02088.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bentsen CL, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R. Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:E102-E116.
2. Bisgaard S, Ankenman B. Standard errors for the eigenvalues in second-order response surface models. Technometrics 1996, 38:238-246.
3. Blows MW, Brooks R. Measuring non-linear selection. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:815-820.
4. Bogin B, Varela-Silva MI. Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7:1047-1075.
5. Braun MF, Bryan A. Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2006, 23:805-819.
6. Brown WM, Price ME, Kang JS, Pound N, Zhao Y, Yu H. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:12938-12943.
7. Buunk BP, Dijkstra P. A narrow waist versus broad shoulders: sex and age differences in the jealousy-evoking characteristics of a rival's body build. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2005, 39:379-389.
8. Cant JGH. Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. Am. Nat. 1981, 117:199-204.
9. Cashdan E. Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: trade-offs between Androgen- and Estrogen-dependent traits. Curr. Anthropol. 2008, 49:1098-1106.
10. Chenoweth SF, Blows MW. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 2005, 165:281-289.
11. Cornelissen PL, Hancock PJB, Kiviniemi V, George HR, Toveé MJ. Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009a, 30:417-428.
12. Cornelissen PL, Toveé MJ, Bateson M. Patterns of subcutaneous fat deposition and the relationship between body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: implications for models of physical attractiveness. J. Theor. Biol. 2009b, 256:343-350.
13. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li BG, Anderson MJ. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2007, 19:88-95.
14. Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch. Sex. Behav 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5
15. Dixson BJ, Sagata K, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. Male preferences for female waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2010, 141:620-625.
16. Donohoe ML, von Hippel W, Brooks R. Beyond waist-hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive. Behav. Ecol. 2009, 20:716-721.
17. Draper N, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1981, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York
18. Fan J, Liu F, Wu J, Dai W. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:347-352.
19. Fan J, Dai W, Liu F, Wu J. Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:219-226.
20. Fan J, Dai W, Qian X, Chau KP, Liu Q. Effects of shape parameters on the attractiveness of a female body. Percept. Mot. Skills 2007, 105:117-132.
21. Frederick DA, Hadji-Michael M, Furnham A, Swami V. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR. Body Image 2010, 7:51-55.
22. Furnham A, Petrides K, Constantinedes A. The effect of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2005, 38:1823-1834.
23. Furnham A, Swami V, Shah K. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2006, 41:443-454.
24. Gangestad SW, Scheyd GJ. The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2005, 34:523-548.
25. Gerhardt HC, Brooks RC. Experimental analysis of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection. Evolution 2009, 63:2504-2512.
26. Grundl M, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. Quantifying female bodily attractiveness by a statistical analysis of body measurements. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 123:1064-1071.
27. Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE. Beauty and the labour market. Am. Econ. Rev. 1994, 84:1174-1194.
28. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: replication and extension. Pers. Individ. Dif. 1995, 19:479-488.
29. Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:1213-1217.
30. Jasienski M, Bazzaz FA. The fallacy of ratios and the testability of models in biology. Oikos 1999, 84:321-326.
31. Johnson KL, Tassinary LG. Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:5246-5251.
32. Lande R, Arnold SJ. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
33. Lassek WD, Gaulin SJC. Changes in body fat distribution in relation to parity in American women: a covert form of maternal depletion. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2006, 131:295-302.
34. LeBas NR, Hockham LR, Ritchie MG. Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on 'honest' female ornamentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270:2159-2165.
35. Liu F, Fan JT, Lau LL. Perceived body size affected by garment and body mass index. Percept. Mot. Skills 2006, 103:253-264.
36. Lynn M. Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2009, 38:737-745.
37. Marlowe F, Apicella C, Reed D. Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2005, 26:458-468.
38. Mascia-Lees FE, Relethford JH, Sorger T. Evolutionary perspectives on permanent breast enlargement in human females. Am. Anthropol. 1986, 88:423-428.
39. Miller G. Spent: Sex, Evolution and Consumer Behaviour 2009, Viking, New York
40. Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS. Why beauty matters. Am. Econ. Rev. 2006, 96:222-235.
41. Pawlowski B. Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. HOMO 1999, 50:149-162.
42. Phillips PC, Arnold SJ. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 1989, 43:1209-1222.
43. Rilling JK, Kaufman TL, Smith EO, Patel R, Worthman CM. Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009, 30:21-31.
44. Rimm A, Hartz A, Fischer M. A weight shape index for assessing risk of disease in 44,820 women. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1988, 41:459-465.
45. Rozmus-Wrzesinska M, Pawlowski B. Men's ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more by changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 68:299-308.
46. Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:443-454.
47. Saad G. Applying evolutionary psychology in understanding the representation of women in advertisements. Psychol. Mark. 2004, 21:593-612.
48. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993a, 65:293-307.
49. Singh D. Body shape and women's attractiveness - the critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Hum. Nat. 1993b, 4:297-321.
50. Singh D, Luis S. Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women's attractiveness. Hum. Nat. 1994, 6:51-65.
51. Singh D, Young RK. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1995, 16:483-507.
52. Smith KL, Toveé MJ, Hancock PJB, Bateson M, Cox MAA, Cornelissen PL. An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination. Vis. Cogn. 2007, 15:927-953.
53. Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF, Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, Blows MW. Estimating non-linear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 2008, 62:2435-2440.
54. Streeter SA, McBurney DH. Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: new evidence and a critique of "a critical test" Evol. Hum. Behav. 2003, 24:88-98.
55. Swami V, Chan F, Wong V, Furnham A, Toveé MJ. Weight-based discrimination in occupational hiring and helping behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38:968-981.
56. Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, Anderson D, Andrianto S, Arora A, Brannstrom A, Cunningham J, Danel D, Doroszewicz K, Forbes GB, Furnham A, Greven CU, Halberstadt J, Hao S, Haubner T, Hwang CS, Inman M, Jaafar JL, Johansson J, Jung J, Keser A, Kretzschmar U, Lachenicht L, Li NP, Locke K, Lonnqvist JE, Lopez C, Loutzenhiser L, Maisel NC, McCabe MP, McCreary DR, McKibbin WF, Mussap A, Neto F, Nowell C, Alampay LP, Pillai SK, Pokrajac-Bulian A, Proyer RT, Quintelier K, Ricciardelli LA, Rozmus-Wrzesinska M, Ruch W, Russo T, Schutz A, Shackelford TK, Shashidharan S, Simonetti F, Sinniah D, Swami M, Vandermassen G, van Duynslaeger M, Verkasalo M, Voracek M, Yee CK, Zhang EX, Zhang XY, Zivcic-Becirevic I. The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the International Body Project I. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 36:309-325.
57. Tassinary LG, Hansen KA. A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 9:150-155.
58. Tovee MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet 1998, 352:548.
59. Toveé MJ, Maisey DS, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999, 266:211-218.
60. Toveé MJ, Hancock PJB, Mahmoodi S, Singleton BRR, Cornelissen PL. Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 269:2205-2213.
61. Voracek M. Multiple correlated cues to female physical attractiveness create multicollinearity problems. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009, 124:1371-1372.
62. Weeden J, Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: a review. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131:635-653.
63. Wells JCK, Treleaven P, Cole TJ. BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: the UK National Sizing Survey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85:419-425.
64. Wells JCK, Cole TJ, Treleaven P. Age-variability in body shape associated with excess weight: The UK National Sizing Survey. Obesity 2008a, 16:435-441.
65. Wells JCK, Ruto A, Treleaven P. Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning: a new technique for obesity research and clinical practice. Int. J. Obes. 2008b, 32:232-238.
66. Zaadstra B, Seidell J, van Noord P, te Velde E, Hambemma J, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J. Prospective study of the effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. Br. Med. J. 1993, 306:484-487.